QuickLinks-- Click hereUse these links to rapidly navigate through thisreview the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.          )

Filed by the Registrantý

Filed by a Party other than the Registranto

Check the appropriate box:

o

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

o

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

ý

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

o

 

Definitive Additional Materials

o

 

Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

 

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ý

 

No fee required.

o

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
  (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
         
  (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
         
  (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
         
  (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
         
  (5) Total fee paid:
         

o

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 

(1)

 

Amount Previously Paid:
        
 
  (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
         
  (3) Filing Party:
         
  (4) Date Filed:
         

Table of Contents


IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED
NOTICE OF 20162018 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON JUNE 17, 2016
14, 2018

To the Stockholders of
IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED:

        Iron Mountain Incorporated will hold its 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or the Annual Meeting, at the offices of Sullivan & Worcester LLP, One Post Office Square, 21st Floor, Boston, Massachusetts 02109, on June 17, 2016,14, 2018, at 10:9:00 a.m. local timeU.S. Eastern Time (11:00 p.m. Australian Eastern Standard Time on June 14, 2018) for the following purposes:

        Attached to this notice is a Proxy Statement relating to the proposals to be considered at the Annual Meeting. The Board of Directors of Iron Mountain Incorporated has fixed the close of business on April 20, 201617, 2018 (5:00 p.m. U.S. Eastern Time) as the record date, or the Record Date, for the determination of stockholders entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting or at any adjournment or postponement thereof. This Proxy Statement is datedRecord holders of CHESS Depositary Interests, or CDIs, as of 5:00 p.m. U.S. Eastern Time on the Record Date (7:00 a.m. Australian Eastern Standard Time on April 26, 2016.18, 2018) are entitled to receive notice of and attend the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof but may not vote in person at the Annual Meeting.

        United States Securities and Exchange Commission rules allow us to furnish proxy materials to our stockholders on the internet. YouStockholders can now access proxy materials and vote at www.proxyvote.com. YouStockholders may also vote via internet or telephone by following the instructions on that website. In order to vote on the internet or by telephone, youstockholders must have a stockholder identification number, which is being mailed to youstockholders of record on a Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials.

        CDI holders may vote the shares of our common stock underlying their CDIs through our CDI Depositary, CHESS Depositary Nominees Pty Ltd, or CDN. Each CDI holder may instruct CDN to vote on behalf of such CDI holder at the Annual Meeting by either following the instructions on the CDI voting instruction form, which is being mailed to CDI holders of record, or by voting online at www.linkmarketservices.com.au. CDI holders may instruct CDN to vote on their behalf only by completing and signing the CDI voting instruction form or voting online at www.linkmarketservices.com.au.

        YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT REGARDLESS OF THE NUMBER OF SHARES THAT YOU BENEFICIALLY OWN.    We urge you to read the Proxy Statement carefully and, whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, to castvote your shares (or direct CDN to vote if you hold your shares in the form of CDIs) without delay online, by telephone (if you are a stockholder) or by mailing a completed proxy card (if you are a stockholder and you elect to receive the proxy materials by mail) or CDI voting instruction form. Instructions regarding each method of voting are provided on the proxy card and the CDI voting instruction form. If you desire to submit your vote without delay as instructed in the Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials thatby mail, you receive in the mail. You may also request a paper proxy card or a replacement CDI voting instruction form at any time on or before June 3, 2016 to submit your vote by mail. Proxies may be revoked, or the votes reflected in the proxy changed, by (1) delivering written notice or another duly executed proxy bearing a later date to the Secretary of Iron Mountain Incorporated, (2) completing another proxy in the same manner indicated on the website referred to in the Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials or (3) attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.1, 2018. If you hold shares in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, nominee or other institution, you must provide a legal proxy from that institution in order to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting, except as otherwise discussed in the Proxy Statement.


Table of Contents

        All stockholders and CDI holders are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting.

  By order of the Board of Directors,

 

 

ERNEST W. CLOUTIER,DEBORAH MARSON,Secretary
Boston, Massachusetts
April 26, 2016

Boston, Massachusetts
April 30, 2018

        IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE 2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON JUNE 17, 2016:STOCKHOLDERS: This Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement, Iron Mountain Incorporated's Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 20152017 and directions to the Annual Meeting are available at: www.materials.proxyvote.com/https://materials.proxyvote.com/46284v. If you are a CDI holder, you may also view and print these materials online at www.linkmarketservices.com.au.


Table of Contents


TABLE OF CONTENTS


Page

GENERAL INFORMATION

1

Stockholders and CDI Holders Entitled to Vote

1

How to Vote

1

If You Are a Registered Holder of Common Stock

2

If You Hold Your Shares of Common Stock "In Street Name"

2

If You Hold CDIs

2

Quorum

3

Votes Required

3

Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes

3

Attendance at the Annual Meeting

4

Revocability of Proxies

4

Information Regarding the Company

5

Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials

5

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

6

Director Nominee Skills and Experience

6

GOVERNANCE

13

Independence

13

Board Leadership Structure

13

Board Meetings and Committees

14

Board and Committee Evaluations

16

The Board's Role in Risk Oversight

17

The Board's Role in Management Succession

17

The Board's Role in Setting Compensation and Assessing Compensation Risk

17

Code of Ethics

17

Political Expenditures

17

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

18

Corporate Responsibility

18

Stockholder Communications with the Board of Directors

19

Selection of Board of Directors Nominees

19

Nominations and Proposals of Stockholders

20

Executive Officers

20

PROPOSAL 2: ADVISORY VOTE ON THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

24

PROPOSAL 3: RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

25

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

26

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

28

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

30

Executive Summary

30

Strategic Plan

32

Aligning Program Design with the Strategic Plan

33

2017 Compensation Decisions and Performance

35

2018 Updates

38

Say-on-Pay Vote Response and Stockholder Engagement

39

Compensation Philosophy and Design Principles

40

Establishing Compensation

41

Components of 2017 Compensation

44

Insider Trading Policy and Prohibition on Hedging and Pledging

66

i


Table of Contents


Page

Tax Considerations

66

Compensation Committee Report on Compensation Discussion and Analysis

67

MEDIAN EMPLOYEE TO CEO PAY RATIO

68

COMPENSATION TABLES

69

Summary Compensation Table

69

Termination and Change of Control Arrangements

76

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

80

2017 Director Compensation

80

Modifications to Director Compensation for 2018

81

CONSIDERATION OF RISK IN OUR COMPENSATION PROGRAMS

82

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

83

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

83

Audit Committee Report

83

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

83

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

84

OTHER MATTERS

85

ii


Table of Contents


IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED
PROXY STATEMENT
FOR THE 20162018 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To be held on June 17, 201614, 2018

GENERAL INFORMATION

        This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors, or the Board, of        Iron Mountain Incorporated, or Iron Mountain, the Company, we, us or our, is furnishing this Proxy Statement in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Iron Mountain Board of Directors, or the Board, for use at the Company's Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 9:00 a.m. U.S. Eastern Time on June 17, 2016,14, 2018 (11:00 p.m. Australian Eastern Standard Time on June 14, 2018), or the Annual Meeting, or at any adjournment or postponement thereof. All stockholders and holders of CHESS Depositary Interests, or CDIs, of record on April 20, 201617, 2018 (5:00 p.m. U.S. Eastern Time), or the Record Date, are invited to attend the Annual Meeting. The Company's Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 20152017 and the Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials relating to the Annual Meeting, or the Notice of Internet Availability, is first being mailed from the United States to stockholders of the CompanyCompany's stockholders on or about April 26, 2016.30, 2018, and the CDI voting instruction form is first being mailed from Australia to CDI holders on or about May 1, 2018 (which is the next business day in Australia following the day of mailing in the United States).

        The Company will bear all costs of solicitation of proxies. Brokers, banks, custodians and other fiduciaries will be requested to forward proxy solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of shares held of record by such persons, and the Company will reimburse thembrokers, banks, custodians and other fiduciaries for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the distribution of such proxy solicitation materials. Solicitation of proxies by mail may be supplemented by telephone, telecopier or personal solicitation by directors, officers or other regular employees of the Company (who will not receive any additional compensation for any solicitation of proxies).

        The Board unanimously recommends that you vote:

Stockholders and CDI Holders Entitled to Vote

        Iron Mountain's common stock, $0.01 par value per share, or the Common Stock, is the only class of voting securities outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Shares of Common Stock also trade on the Australian Stock Exchange, or ASX, in the form of CDIs. Each CDI represents a beneficial interest in one share of Common Stock. As of the close of business5:00 p.m. U.S. Eastern Time on April 20, 2016, the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting, or the Record Date, 211,946,343285,923,944 shares of Common Stock (including 9,117,764 CDIs exchangeable into shares of Common Stock) were outstanding and entitled to vote. Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote on each matter.

How to Vote

        Your vote is very important no matter how many shares of Common Stock or CDIs you own. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote your shares of Common Stock or CDIs today.

        If youStockholders who wish to receive a paper or email copy of the proxy card to complete and mail to the Company in time for the Annual Meeting you may request one at any time on or before June 3, 2016. You1, 2018.


Table of Contents

Stockholders may vote yourtheir shares over the internet or by telephone in the manner provided on the website indicated in the Notice of Internet Availability youthey receive in the mail, or the Website, by completing and returning a proxy card or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. CDI holders may instruct our CDI Depositary, CHESS Depositary Nominees Pty Ltd, or CDN, to vote on their behalf only by completing and signing the CDI voting instruction form they receive in the mail or voting online at www.linkmarketservices.com.au. Votes provided over the internet or by telephone by stockholders must be received by 11:59 p.m. U.S. Eastern Daylight Time on June 16, 2016.13, 2018, and instructions provided over the internet by our CDI holders must be received by 1:59 p.m. Australian Eastern Standard Time on June 11, 2018.


If You Are a Registered Holder of Common Stock

        If you are a registered holder of Common Stock, you may vote your shares of Common Stock, or Shares, either by voting by proxy in advance of the Annual Meeting or by voting in person at the Annual Meeting. By submitting a proxy (on a proxy card or in the manner provided on the Website), you are legally authorizing another person to vote your sharesShares on your behalf. We urge you to vote (1) FOR the Board's nominees for director, (2) FOR the approval of a non-binding, advisory resolution approving the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as described in this Proxy Statement and (3) FOR the ratification of the selection by the Audit Committee of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2016. If you submit your executed proxy card or submit a proxy in the manner provided on the Website, your sharesShares will be voted in accordance with the Board's recommendations set forth in this Proxy Statement, unless otherwise directed, in which case your sharesShares will be voted as specified by you on the proxy. In addition, if any other matters are brought before the Annual Meeting (other than the proposals contained in this Proxy Statement), then the individuals listed on the proxy will have the authority to vote your sharesShares on those other matters in accordance with their discretion and judgment.

        In case a quorum is not present at the Annual Meeting, the holders of a majority of the voting power of the sharesShares present at the Annual Meeting in person or represented by proxy may adjourn the Annual Meeting (without notice other than announcement of adjournment at the Annual Meeting) to another time, or to another time and place.

        Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to promptly vote over the internet or by telephone in the manner provided on the Website or by completing and returning a proxy card. If you later decide to attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person, the vote you cast in person at the Annual Meeting will automatically revoke any previously submitted proxy.

If You Hold Your Shares of Common Stock "In Street Name"

        If your sharesShares are held in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, nominee or other institution (referred to as "in street name"), you will receive instructions from the holder of record, or street name holder, that you must follow in order for you to specify how your sharesShares will be voted. If you do not specify how you would like your sharesShares to be voted, your sharesShares held in street name may still be voted. Certain street name holders have the authority to vote sharesShares for which their customers do not provide voting instructions on certain routine, uncontested items.proposals. The election of directors and the advisory vote on executive compensation are not routine matters for purposes of broker voting. The ratification of the selection of our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 20162018 is a routine matter; therefore, there will be no broker non-votes in connection with that matter.

        IMPORTANT: If your sharesShares are held in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, nominee or other institution, you should provide instructions to your broker, bank, nominee or other institution on how to vote your shares.Shares. Please contact the person responsible for your account and give instructions for a proxy to be completed for your shares.Shares.

If You Hold CDIs

        Each CDI holder is entitled to direct CDN to cast one vote for each CDI held by such holder. CDI holders are entitled to receive notice of and attend the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or


Table of Contents

postponement thereof and may direct CDN to vote their underlying shares of Common Stock at the Annual Meeting by (1) returning a validly completed CDI voting instruction form to Link Market Services Limited, Locked Bag A14, Sydney South, New South Wales, Australia 1235, the agent we designated for the collection and processing of voting instructions from our CDI holders, so that it is received by no later than 1:59 p.m. Australian Eastern Standard Time on June 11, 2018 (which is 11:59 p.m. U.S. Eastern Time on June 10, 2018) or (2) voting online at www.linkmarketservices.com.au before 1:59 p.m. Australian Eastern Standard Time on June 11, 2018 (which is 11:59 p.m. U.S. Eastern Time on June 10, 2018).

        Alternatively, any CDI holder may inform the Company that such CDI holder wishes to nominate himself or another person to be appointed as CDN's proxy with respect to such CDI holder's underlying Shares for the purposes of attending and voting at the Annual Meeting. Holders of CDIs will not appear on the Company's share register as the legal holders of Common Stock; therefore, no CDI holder will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting unless such CDI holder is appointed as a proxy by CDN.

Quorum

        The presence at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, of stockholders entitled to cast at least a majority of the votes that all stockholders are entitled to cast at the Annual Meeting, including the Shares represented by the CDIs, will constitute a quorum. Shares represented by valid proxies (in the case of stockholders) or valid CDI voting instruction forms (in the case of CDI holders) will be treated as present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining a quorum, without regard to whether the proxy is noted as casting a vote or abstaining. Shares represented by broker non-votes will be treated as present for purposes of determining a quorum. Shares voted by a broker on any issue other than a procedural motion will be considered present for all quorum purposes, even if the sharessuch Shares are not voted on every matter.


Votes Required

        As more fully described in this Proxy Statement:

Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes

        A "broker non-vote" occurs on an itema proposal when a broker identified as the record holder of sharesShares is not permitted by the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE, to vote on that itemproposal without instruction from the beneficial owner of the sharesShares and no instruction has been received with respect to that item.proposal. Under the NYSE rules, brokers may vote on routine matters even without instructions from the street name holder. The election of directors and the advisory vote on executive compensation are not routine matters for purposes of broker voting. If you do not instruct your broker how to vote with respect to these items,proposals, your broker may not vote with respect to these proposals and your sharesShares will be counted as "broker non-votes." The ratification of the selection of our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 20162018 is a routine


Table of Contents

matter; therefore, there will be no broker non-votes in connection with that matter. CDN is not permitted to cast votes on any proposal unless specifically directed by the applicable CDI holder.

        A properly completed proxy and CDI voting instruction form, if received in time for voting and not revoked, will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions contained therein, and, unlesstherein. Unless otherwise directed, the sharesShares represented by the proxy card will be voted:

        Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and, therefore, will not affect the proposals that are being submitted to the Company's stockholders at the Annual Meeting.

        Although the advisory vote on the proposed resolution to approve the compensation of the Company'sour Named Executive Officers is non-binding, the Compensation Committee of the Board will consider the outcome of thesuch vote when making future compensation decisions for the Company's Named Executive Officers.our named executive officers.

Attendance at the Annual Meeting

        Attendance at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof will be limited to stockholders and CDI holders of record of the Company as of the close of business5:00 p.m. U.S. Eastern Time on the Record Date (7:00 a.m. Australian Eastern Standard Time on April 18, 2018) and guests of the Company. If you are a stockholder or CDI holder of record of the Company as of the close of business5:00 p.m. U.S. Eastern Time on the Record Date (7:00 a.m. Australian Eastern Standard Time on April 18, 2018), your name will be verified against the list of stockholders or CDI holders, as applicable, of record prior to your admittance to the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. Please be prepared to present photo identification for admission. If you hold your sharesShares in street name, you will need to provide proof of beneficial ownership, such as a brokerage account statement, a copy of a voting instruction form


provided by your custodian with respect to the Annual Meeting or other similar evidence of ownership, as well as photo identification, in order to be admitted to the Annual Meeting. Please note that if you hold your sharesShares in street name and intend to vote in person at the Annual Meeting, you must also provide a "legal proxy" obtained from your custodian. Each CDI holder may attend the Annual Meeting but cannot vote in person at the Annual Meeting unless such CDI holder is appointed as a proxy by CDN.

Revocability of Proxies

        Any stockholder giving a proxy in the manner set forth in the Notice of Internet Availability has the power to revoke such proxy at any time before it is exercised. If you are a registered holder of Common Stock,Shares, you may revoke a previously submitted proxy by voting over the internet or by telephone at a later time in the manner provided on the Website. Any such notice or vote must be received by 11:59 p.m. U.S. Eastern Daylight Time on June 16, 2016.13, 2018. You may also revoke your proxy by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.

        If you are a CDI holder and you direct CDN to vote by completing the CDI voting instruction form, you may revoke those directions online at www.linkmarketservices.com.au or by delivering to Link Market Services Limited, Locked Bag A14, Sydney South, New South Wales, Australia 1235, no later than 1:59 p.m. Australian Eastern Standard Time on June 11, 2018 (which is 11:59 p.m. U.S. Eastern Time on June 10, 2018).


Table of Contents

Please note, however, that only your last-datedlast dated proxy or CDI voting instruction will count,be counted, and any proxy or CDI voting instruction may be revoked at any time prior to its exercise at the Annual Meeting, as described in this Proxy Statement.

        If your sharesShares are held in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, nominee or other institution, and you have instructed your brokerage firm, bank, nominee or other institution to vote your shares,Shares, you must follow the instructions received from your brokerage firm, bank, nominee or other institution to change your voting instruction. Please contact your custodian for detailed instructions on how to revoke your voting instruction and the applicable deadlines.

Information Regarding the Company

        Our principal executive offices are located at One Federal Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02110.

        The Company's website address, www.ironmountain.com, is included several times in this Proxy Statement as a textual reference only, and the information in the Company's website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement.

Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials

        In accordance with rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, instead of mailing a printed copy of our proxy materials to each stockholder of record, the Company may furnish proxy materials via the internet. Accordingly, all of the Company's stockholders, other than CDI holders, will receive a Notice of Internet Availability, which will be mailed on or about April 26, 2016.30, 2018.

        On the date of mailing the Notice of Internet Availability, stockholders will be able to access all of the proxy materials at www.materials.proxyvote.com/https://materials.proxyvote.com/46284v. The proxy materials will be available free of charge, and the Notice of Internet Availability will provide instructions as to how youstockholders may access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials (including the Company's Annual Report to stockholders)Stockholders) over the internet or through other methods specified on the Website. The Website contains instructions as to how tostockholders may vote by internet or over the telephone. The Notice of Internet Availability also instructs youstockholders as to how youthey may request a paper or email copy of the proxy card. If you receive a Notice of Internet Availability and would like to receive printed copies of the proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials included in the Notice of Internet Availability.

        All CDI holders will receive a printed copy of our proxy materials along with the CDI voting instruction form. If you are a CDI holder, you may also view and print these materials online at www.linkmarketservices.com.au. The CDI voting instruction form will provide instructions as to how CDI holders may access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials (including the Company's Annual Report to Stockholders) over the internet. The CDI voting instruction form contains instructions as to how CDI holders may direct CDN to vote on their behalf.


Table of Contents


ITEMPROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

        The Board currently consists of ten (10)eleven (11) directors. Each current director serves foris currently serving a one-year term, and the term of each director will expire at the Annual Meeting.

        In September 2015, in connection with the Company's agreement, or the Recall Agreement, to acquire Recall Holdings Limited, or Recall, and conditioned on the consummation of the Company's acquisition of Recall, the Board increased the number of directors to twelve (12) and appointed Mr. Neil Chatfield and Ms. Wendy J. Murdock, each of whom currently serves as a non-executive director of Recall, to the Board. In accordance with the terms of the Recall Agreement, the Board also agreed to name Mr. Chatfield and Ms. Murdock as nominees to the Board to be voted on by the Company's stockholders at the first annual meeting of stockholders following the consummation of the Company's acquisition of Recall. The Company expects to complete the acquisition of Recall on May 2, 2016, and, consequently, the appointment of Mr. Chatfield and Ms. Murdock to the Board is expected to become effective on May 2, 2016. The term of each of Mr. Chatfield and Ms. Murdock will expire at the Annual Meeting.

At the Annual Meeting, all nominees areeach nominee is to be elected for a one-year termsterm to serve until the Company's 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or until their successors aresuch nominee's successor is elected and qualified.

        The Board has selected as nominees the following twelve (12)eleven (11) individuals, all of whom are current directors of the Company (except for Mr. Chatfield and Ms. Murdock, each of whom is expected to become a director of the Company on May 2, 2016):Company: Jennifer Allerton, Ted R. Antenucci, Pamela M. Arway, Clarke H. Bailey, Neil Chatfield, Kent P. Dauten, Paul F. Deninger, Per-Kristian Halvorsen, William L. Meaney, Wendy J. Murdock, Walter C. Rakowich and Alfred J. Verrecchia. Each nominee has agreed to serve if elected, and management has no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unavailable to serve. For more detail on the process our Board follows when selecting nominees, please see page 19.

Required VoteDirector Nominee Skills and Experience

        Each nominee for director must receive a majority of the votes cast on his or her nomination to be elected. This means a nominee will be elected to the Board only if the votes cast "For" such nominee's election exceed the votes cast "Against" such nominee's election, with abstentions and broker non-votes not counting as votes "For" or "Against." Under the Company's Bylaws, if the number of votes cast "For" a director nominee does not exceed the number of votes "Against" the director nominee, and if the nominee is an incumbent director, then he or she must promptly tender his or her resignation from the Board. Each incumbent director, and each of Mr. Chatfield and Ms. Murdock, has already tendered an irrevocable resignation that will be effective upon (1) the failure to receive the required number of votes for re-election at the Annual Meeting or any meeting of stockholders at which he or she faces re-election and (2) the acceptance of such resignation by the Board. The Board will decide within 90 days of the certification of the stockholder vote, through a process managed byand the Nominating and Governance Committee select director nominees on the basis of their integrity, experience, achievements, judgment, intelligence, personal character, ability to make independent analytical inquiries, willingness to devote adequate time to Board duties and likelihood that they will be able to serve on the Board for a sustained period. The Board and the Nominating and Governance Committee believe each director nominee should be well-versed in strategic oversight, corporate governance, stockholder advocacy, and leadership in order to be an effective member of the Board and excluding the nominee in question, whether to accept the resignation. The Board's explanation of its decision will be promptly disclosed in a filing with the SEC.Board.

        Brokers are not permitted to vote your shares for the election of directors absent instruction from you. Therefore, we urge you to give voting instructions to your broker on the proxy so that your votes may be counted on this important matter.

The Board recommends that you vote FOR the election of each of the Board's twelve (12) nominees to serve as directors of Iron Mountain until the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or until their successors are elected and qualified.


Information Concerning the Directors and Director Nominees

        Set forth below is the name and age of each of our director nominees and his or her principal occupation as of April 15, 2016, as well as his or her business experience during the past five years and the names of certain other companies of which he or she currently serves as a director or has served as a director during the past five years. In addition to the information presented below regarding each nominee's specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led our Board to the conclusion that he or she should serve as a director, we alsoWe believe that all of our director nominees havemeet these criteria. They bring a reputation for integrityfull array of business and sound judgmentleadership skills to their oversight responsibilities and excellent analytical skills. Each of our director nominees has demonstrated business acumenrepresent diverse skills and complementsexperiences, which the attributes and skillsBoard believes will contribute to the effective oversight of the other director nominees.Company.


Table of Contents

        More details about their background and experience can be found below. Each of the nominees has consented to be named in this Proxy Statement and to serve on the Board, if elected.

Nominee
 Principal Occupations, Directorships and Business Experience During the Past Five Years
Jennifer Allerton
Age 6466
 Ms. Allerton has been one of our directors since September 2014. Ms. Allerton has more than 3940 years of information technology experience, most recently as chief information officer at F. Hoffman la Roche, or Roche, in Switzerland with responsibility for ITinformation technology strategy and operations for the Pharmapharmaceutical division and all Group ITgroup information technology operations from June 2002 to July 2012. Prior to Roche, Ms. Allerton served from May 1999 to June 2002 as Technology Director at Barclaycard in the UKUnited Kingdom with responsibility for Fraud Operationsfraud operations and IT.information technology. Ms. Allerton serves on the board of directors of Sandvik AB, a global engineering company, Oxford Instruments, a provider of high technology tools and systems, and Aveva plc, an engineering design and information management solutions firm for the plant, power and marine industries. From March 2017 to December 2017, Ms. Allerton served as a non-executive director of Paysafe Group plc, a provider of digital payments and transaction-related solutions to businesses and consumers, or Paysafe, and was a member of Paysafe's Audit and Nomination Committees. From June 2013 to September 2016, Ms. Allerton served as a non-executive director of Oxford Instruments plc, a leading provider of high technology tools and systems for research and industry, and was a member of its Audit, Nomination and Remuneration Committees. Ms. Allerton holds Bachelor degrees in Mathematicsmathematics from Imperial College, London and in Physical Sciencesphysical sciences and Geosciencesgeosciences from the Open University, United Kingdom, and a Master's degree in Physicsphysics from the University of Manitoba, Canada. We believe Ms. Allerton's qualifications for nomination include her significant experience working for global multinational companies and running complex, international businesses, her extensive knowledge of technology and its successful application to data centers, and her experience as a board member of several large international companies.

Ted R. Antenucci
Age 5153

 

Mr. Antenucci has been one of our directors since June 2011. Mr. Antenucci currently serves as both president and chief executive officer of Catellus Development Corporation, or Catellus, a private real estate developer, positions he has held since March 2011. Additionally, until June 30, 2011, he served in a dual role as president and chief investment officer of Prologis, Inc., or Prologis, a publicly held industrial real estate investment trust, or REIT, positions he assumed in 2007. Prior to these roles, Mr. Antenucci served from 2005 to 2007 as president of global development for Prologis. From 2001 to 2005, he was president of Catellus Commercial Development, a subsidiary of Catellus, until Catellus and Prologis merged in 2005. Mr. Antenucci serves on the boardhas been a director of directorsCatellus since March 2011 and has been a director of Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc., a publicly held company, on the board of Catellus and asREIT, since June 2010. Also, Mr. Antenucci has been a trustee of the Children's Hospital Foundation, a non-profit organization.organization, since June 2010. Mr. Antenucci holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Business Economicsbusiness economics from the University of California at Santa Barbara. We believe Mr. Antenucci's qualifications for nomination include valuable industry knowledge and management expertise that Mr. Antenucci has developed as an executive of an industrial REIT and as a member of the board of directors of a publicly held real estate company,REIT, as well as his experience in real estate acquisitions, operations and capital allocation.

Table of Contents

Nominee
 Principal Occupations, Directorships and Business Experience During the Past Five Years
Pamela M. Arway
Age 6264
 Ms. Arway has been one of our directors since May 2014. Ms. Arway served in a number of capacities during her 21-year21 year career with the American Express Company, Inc., a global payments, network and travel publicly held company, and its subsidiaries, until her retirement in 2008. Ms. Arway served as president, Japan/Asia Pacific/Australia Region, American Express International, Inc., Singapore from October 2005 to January 2008. From December 2004 to October 2005, Ms. Arway served as chief executive officer, American Express Australia Ltd., Sydney, Australia. From July 2000 to December 2004, Ms. Arway served as executive vice president and general manager, Corporate Travel North America, American Express Company, Inc. Ms. Arway has been a director of The Hershey Company, a publicly held company, since May 2010 and has been a director of DaVita Healthcare Partners, Inc., a publicly held company, since May 2009. Ms. Arway holds a Bachelor'sBachelor degree in languages from Memorial University of Newfoundland and a Master of Business Administration degree from Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. We believe Ms. Arway's qualifications for nomination include her significant leadership experience as a global executive, her expertise in the areas of marketing, international business, finance and government affairs and her experience as a board member of several large publicly held companies.

Clarke H. Bailey
Age 6163

 

Mr. Bailey has been one of our directors since January 1998. Since 1990, Mr. Bailey has served as a director of EDCI Holdings, Inc., a private company that until November 2011 was engaged in the manufacture and distribution of CDs and DVDs, and has served as its chairman since June 1999 and its chief executive officer since July 2009. Mr. Bailey also previously served as chief executive officer of EDCI Holdings, Inc. from November 2003 to November 2006. Mr. Bailey has served as a director of SMTC Corporation, a publicly held company, since June 2011. Mr. Bailey has served as Chairmanchairman of SMTC Corporation since April 2014, and he served as executive chairman and interim chief financial officer of SMTC Corporation from May 2013 to April 2014. HeMr. Bailey holds a Master of Business Administration degree from The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. We believe Mr. Bailey's qualifications for nomination include his deep industry knowledge and experience gained as the former chief executive officer of Arcus Data Security, an offsite data protection business we acquired in 1998, his understanding of our businesses, operations and strategies as a member of our Board for the past 1820 years, his past experience as chairman and chief executive officer of another publicly held company and his service on the boards of directors of other publicly held companies and his experience as chairman of our Compensation Committee.companies.

Table of Contents

Nominee
 Principal Occupations, Directorships and Business Experience During the Past Five Years
Neil Chatfield
Age 61
Mr. Chatfield will become one of our directors in connection with the consummation of our acquisition of Recall, which we expect to complete on May 2, 2016. Since September 2013, Mr. Chatfield has served as a non-executive director, and chairman of the Audit Committee, of Recall. Mr. Chatfield has served as non-executive chairman of Costa Group since June 2015 and a director since October 2011. Mr. Chatfield has also served as chairman of Seek Limited since 2012 and a director since 2005. In addition, Mr. Chatfield has served as a non-executive director of Transurban Group since 2009. Mr. Chatfield has over 35 years of experience in the transport, logistics and resources industries, including as an executive director and chief financial officer of Toll Holdings Limited for more than ten years. Mr. Chatfield holds a Master of Business in Finance and Accounting from the University of Technology Sydney, a Graduate Diploma in Information Technology from Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, a Graduate Diploma in Accounting from Swinburne Institute of Technology and a Diploma in Business Studies from Footscray Institute of Technology. We believe Mr. Chatfield's qualifications for nomination include his deep industry knowledge and experience gained as a non-executive director of Recall, his experience as chairman of another publicly held company, his significant experience working for global multinational companies and running complex, international businesses, and his corporate finance and accounting expertise.

Kent P. Dauten
Age 60
62

 

Mr. Dauten has been one of our directors since November 1997. Mr. Dauten serveshas served as Managing Directorchairman of Keystone Capital, Inc., a private investment firm, or Keystone, since September 2017. Previously, Mr. Dauten served as managing director of Keystone, a position he has held since founding the firm in February 1994. Mr. Dauten served as a director of Health Management Associates, Inc., a publicly held hospital management firm, from November 1988 until August 2013. HeMr. Dauten holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in economics from Dartmouth College and a Master of Business Administration degree from Harvard Business School. We believe Mr. Dauten's qualifications for nomination include his deep industry knowledge and experience as the former president of HIMSCORP, Inc., a records management company we acquired by Iron Mountain in 1997, his extensive knowledge of the capital markets and business management as the managing director of a private investment business, his understanding of our businesses, operations and strategies as a member of our Board for over 1820 years, his qualification as a financial expert on our Audit Committee,acumen, his service on the board of directors of another publicly held company and his prior experience as our lead independent director.


Nominee
Principal Occupations, Directorships and Business Experience During the Past Five Years
Paul F. Deninger
Age 5759

 

Mr. Deninger joinedhas been one of our Board indirectors since September 2010. Mr. Deninger has been executive chairman of IDL Development, Inc., a senior advisor atprivate company engaged in advanced material science research and development, since June 2016. Mr. Deninger also serves as a consultant to Evercore Partners, Inc., or Evercore, a publicly held investment banking advisory firm, sincefirm. From April 2015.2015 to June 2016, Mr. Deninger served as a senior advisor at Evercore. From February 2011 to April 2015, Mr. Deninger served as a senior managing director at Evercore. From December 2003 until October 2010, Mr. Deninger served as a vice chairman at Jefferies & Company, Inc., or Jefferies, a global securities and investment banking firm and the principal operating subsidiary of Jefferies Group, Inc. Prior to Jefferies, Mr. Deninger held various positions at Broadview International LLC, or Broadview, a private investment banking firm he joined in 1987, including serving as its chairman and chief executive officer at the time Broadview was acquired by Jefferies in 2003. Mr. Deninger holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Boston College and a Master of Business Administration degree from Harvard Business School. We believe Mr. Deninger's qualifications for nomination include his deep knowledge of capital markets, merger and acquisition strategies and technology services businesses as well as his extensive management experience including as a former chief executive officer.

Table of Contents

Nominee
Principal Occupations, Directorships and Business Experience During the Past Five Years

Per-Kristian Halvorsen
Age 64
66

 

Mr. Halvorsen joined our Board in September 2009. Mr.Dr. Halvorsen has been chief innovation officer and senior vice presidentone of our directors since September 2009. Dr. Halvorsen joined Intuit, Inc., or Intuit, a publicly held software company, since December 2008. Prior to that role, Mr. Halvorsenor Intuit, in 2006 and has served as Intuit'sIntuit in various roles including chief technology officer from 2007 to 2008 and chief technology innovation officer from 20062008 to 2007.2016. He has been Intuit's senior engineering fellow and senior vice president since June 2016. Prior to Intuit, Mr.Dr. Halvorsen was vice president of HP Labs, and center director of Solutions and Services for Hewlett-Packard Company, a publicly held company, where, from 2000 to 2005, he oversaw global research and advanced technology for its ITinformation technology services division. Mr.Dr. Halvorsen was laboratory manager and principal scientist at Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, where he founded the Information Sciences and Technology Lab and worked from August 1983 to May 2000. Mr.Dr. Halvorsen has beenwas a director of Nets Holding A/S from December 2015 until September 2016, when he became a director of Nets A/S. Dr. Halvorsen was a director of Autodesk Inc., a publicly held company, sincefrom March 2000 and a director of Nets Holding A/S, a private company, since 2015. Mr.to June 2016. Dr. Halvorsen holds a Ph.D. and a Master of Arts degree in linguistics from the University of Texas at Austin. We believe Mr.Dr. Halvorsen's qualifications for nomination include his extensive knowledge about the technology industry, the development and use of new technology and the overall operation of technology businesses through his experience at large technology companies, his understanding and insight with respect to international businesses and his experience as a member of the boards of directors of publicly held companies.


Nominee
Principal Occupations, Directorships and Business Experience During the Past Five Years
William L. Meaney
Age 5658

 

Mr. Meaney assumed the role of our chief executive officer, or CEO, and, simultaneously, became a member of the Board, in January 2013. Mr. Meaney served as chief executive officer of The Zuellig Group, a private business-to-businessbusiness to business conglomerate, from August 2004 until March 2012. Prior to that position, Mr. Meaney served as Managing Director and Chief Commercial Officer for Swiss International Air Lines, Ltd., a private company providing passenger and cargo transportation services in Europe and internationally, from December 2002 to January 2004. Mr. Meaney currently serves on the board of directors of State Street Corporation, a publicly held company that provides financial services to institutional investors, and Qantas Airways Limited, an Australian publicly held company offering passenger and air freight transportation services in Australia and internationally, andinternationally. Mr. Meaney also serves on the boardsNew York Advisory Board of FM Global, a privately held mutual insurance company. Mr. Meaney served on the board of trustees of Carnegie Mellon University until June 2017 and on the board of trustees of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.Institute until April 2018. Mr. Meaney holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineeringmechanical engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and a Master of Science degree in Industrial Administrationindustrial administration from Carnegie Mellon University. We believe Mr. Meaney's qualifications for nomination include his understanding of our businesses, operations and strategies as our current CEO, his extensive experience with global operations and capital allocation and his experience leading a primarily business-to-businessbusiness to business company.

Table of Contents

Nominee
Principal Occupations, Directorships and Business Experience During the Past Five Years

Wendy J. Murdock
Age 63
65

 

Ms. Murdock will becomehas been one of our directors in connection with the consummation of our acquisition of Recall, which we expect to complete onsince May 2, 2016. SinceFrom December 2013 to May 2016, Ms. Murdock has served as a non-executive director of Recall. In addition, since 2013, Ms. Murdock has served on the Boardboard of directors and Risk Management Committeerisk management committee of USAA Federal Savings Bank and, since September 2017, has served as chair of USAA Federal Saving Bank's trust committee. Ms. Murdock has served on the board of directors and audit committee of USAA Savings Bank, a subsidiary of USAA Federal Savings Bank, since April 2016. Since March 2016, Ms. Murdock has served on the Boardboard of directors and the Investment and Risk Committeevarious committees of La Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec.bec, including the investment and risk committee and, since December 2017, the governance committee. From 2005 to 2013, Ms. Murdock held a variety of positions with MasterCard Worldwide, including serving as a member of the MasterCard Worldwide Operating Committee, chief payment system integrity officer and chief product officer. Ms. Murdock holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from McGill University and a Master of Business Administration degree from the University of Western Ontario. We believe Ms. Murdock's qualifications for nomination include her deep industry knowledge and experience gained as a non-executive director of Recall, her significant leadership experience as a global executive and her expertise in the areas of international business and finance.


Nominee
Principal Occupations, Directorships and Business Experience During the Past Five Years
Walter C. Rakowich
Age 5860

 

Mr. Rakowich has been one of our directors since August 2013. Mr. Rakowich served as CEOchief executive officer of Prologis from November 2008 through June 2011, when Prologis merged with AMB Property Corporation (with the merged company being named Prologis), after which he assumed the role of co-CEOco-chief executive officer and served as a member of the Prologis board of directors until he retired in December 2012 after 18 years at Prologis. Before becoming CEO,2012. Mr. Rakowich held a number of senior management positions while at Prologis before becoming chief executive officer, including managing director and chief financial officer from December 1998 to January 2005 and president and chief operating officer from January 2005 to November 2008. Mr. Rakowich served on the Prologis board of trustees from January 2005 through June 2011. Mr. Rakowich is a member of the board of directors of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., a publicly held company.REIT, and a member of the board of directors of Ventas, Inc. a publicly held REIT. Mr. Rakowich holds a Bachelor of Science degree in accounting from Pennsylvania State University and a Master of Business Administration degree from Harvard Business School. We believe Mr. Rakowich's qualifications for nomination include valuable industry knowledge and management expertise that Mr. Rakowich has developed as CEOchief executive officer of an industrial REIT, as well as his corporate finance and accounting expertise.expertise and his experience as a member of the board of directors of other publicly held REITs.

Table of Contents

Nominee
Principal Occupations, Directorships and Business Experience During the Past Five Years

Alfred J. Verrecchia
Age 73
75

 

Mr. Verrecchia became a memberhas been one of our Board indirectors since March 2010 and has served as our Independent Chairman since March 2013. Mr. Verrecchia served as chairman of the board of directors of Hasbro, Inc., or Hasbro, a publicly held branded play company, from May 2008 to May 2015. He was the president and chief executive officer of Hasbro from 2003 until 2008, and prior to that he served as Hasbro's chief operating officer and chief financial officer. Mr. Verrecchia has served on the board of directors of several publicly held companies, including Old Stone Corp. from 1987 to 2012, FGX International Holdings Limited from February 2009 to March 2010 and CVS Caremark from September 2004 to March 2007. Mr. Verrecchia holds both a Bachelor of Arts degree in accounting and a Master of Business Finance degree, each from the University of Rhode Island. We believe Mr. Verrecchia's qualifications for nomination include his strong understanding and insights related to the operation of an enterprise in both the U.S. and international markets as the currentformer chairman and former chief executive officer and president of a multinational publicly held corporation, his experience transforming a traditional product business, his extensive understanding of the capital markets and accounting as a former chief financial officer and his experience as a member of the board of directors of other publicly held companiescompanies. Due to Mr. Verrecchia's qualifications and his prior experience as our lead independent director.valuable contributions to the Board, and pursuant to the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines and, specifically, the Company's director retirement and term limits, the Board has affirmatively determined it to be in the Company's best interests that Mr. Verrecchia stand for re-election after reaching the age of 75.

Required Vote

        Each director nominee must receive a majority of the votes cast on his or her nomination to be elected. This means a director nominee will be elected to the Board only if the votes cast "For" such nominee's election exceed the votes cast "Against" such nominee's election, with abstentions and broker non-votes not counting as votes "For" or "Against." Under the Company's Bylaws, if the number of votes cast "For" a director nominee does not exceed the number of votes "Against" the nominee, and if the nominee is an incumbent director, then he or she must promptly tender his or her resignation from the Board. Each incumbent director has already tendered an irrevocable resignation that will be effective upon (1) the failure to receive the required number of votes for re-election at the Annual Meeting or any meeting of stockholders at which he or she faces re-election and (2) the acceptance of such resignation by the Board. The Board annually elects the officerswill decide within 90 days of the Company. Each officer holds office atcertification of the discretionstockholder vote, through a process managed by the Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board, or the Nominating and Governance Committee, and excluding the director nominee in question, whether to accept the resignation. The Board's explanation of its decision will be promptly disclosed in a filing with the SEC.

        Brokers and CDN are not permitted to vote your Shares for the election of directors absent instruction from you. Therefore, we urge you to give voting instructions to your broker on the proxy, or, in the case of CDI holders, give voting instructions to CDN, so that your votes may be counted on this important matter.

The Board recommends that you vote FOR the election of each of the Board's eleven (11) nominees to serve as directors of Iron Mountain until the first meeting2019 Annual Meeting of the Board following the next annual meeting of stockholdersStockholders, or until such officer sooner dies, resigns or is removed. Theretheir successors are no family relationships between or among any of the Company's officers or directors.elected and qualified.


        Set forth below is the name and ageTable of each of our executive officers who is not nominated to be a director of the Company, his or her principal occupation and business experience during the past five years and the names of certain other companies of which he or she served as a director, as of April 15, 2016.

Name
Principal Occupations and Business Experience During the Past Five Years
Edward Bicks
Age 47
Mr. Bicks was appointed senior vice president, chief strategy officer of the Company in February 2016. Prior to February 2016, Mr. Bicks served as senior vice president, chief strategy officer and emerging businesses of the Company from April 2015 to February 2016. From September 2013 to April 2015, Mr. Bicks served as senior vice president of the Company. From December 2012 to September 2013, Mr. Bicks served as senior vice president, strategy and change management at Forrester Research, Inc., or Forrester. From May 2005 to September 2013, Mr. Bicks served as vice president, strategy at Forrester. Mr. Bicks holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics from Williams College and a Master of Business Administration from the MIT Sloan School of Management.

Ernest W. Cloutier
Age 43


Mr. Cloutier was appointed executive vice president, U.S. federal, security and legal of the Company in June 2014. In addition, Mr. Cloutier also serves as the Company's general counsel and secretary, positions which he has held since joining the Company in December 2007 as a senior vice president of the Company. In June 2011 Mr. Cloutier was appointed as an executive vice president of the Company, and Mr. Cloutier assumed responsibility for the Company's global security and risk organizations in March 2014. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Cloutier served as senior vice president, general counsel and secretary for Digitas Inc. from May 2004 to November 2007. Mr. Cloutier holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Science from Bates College and a juris doctor from The American University Washington College of Law.

Roderick Day
Age 52


Mr. Day was appointed chief financial officer of the Company in March 2014. Prior to this appointment, Mr. Day served as the Company's interim chief financial officer since November 2013. Mr. Day served as senior vice president and chief financial officer of Iron Mountain International from November 2009 to October 2013. In July 2008, Mr. Day joined the Company as chief financial officer of Iron Mountain Europe. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Day served as chief financial officer at AOL Europe from September 2006 to May 2008. Mr. Day served as vice president, finance and strategy at AOL Europe from August 2003 to August 2006 and director, financial control and planning at AOL Europe from September 2001 to July 2003. Mr. Day holds a degree in Economics from Cambridge University and a Master of Business Administration degree from London Business School.

Contents

Name
Principal Occupations and Business Experience During the Past Five Years
Marc A. Duale
Age 63
Mr. Duale was appointed president, Iron Mountain International in September 2008. He served as president of Iron Mountain Europe from May 2006 to September 2008. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Duale served as managing director for Reuters Asia from January 2002 to April 2006. From 1999 to 2002, Mr. Duale served as chief operating officer for DHL Asia. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree and a Master of Science degree from Ecole Nationale des Techniques Avancees, a Master of Business Administration degree from Harvard Business School and a Master of Science degree in ocean engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Deirdre Evens
Age 52


Ms. Evens was appointed executive vice president, chief people officer of the Company in July 2015. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Evens served as executive vice president of human resources at Clean Harbors, Inc., or Clean Harbors, from September 2011 to July 2015. From June 2008 to September 2011, Ms. Evens served as executive vice president of sales and marketing at Clean Harbors. Ms. Evens holds a Bachelor of Science in mechanical engineering from Cornell University.

Patrick Keddy
Age 61


Mr. Keddy was appointed executive vice president and general manager, North America and Western Europe of the Company in April 2015. Mr. Keddy joined the Company as senior vice president, Western Europe, in November 2011, responsible for the operations of the Company's Records Management, Document Management Solutions, Data Management and Secure Shredding businesses. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Keddy served as President of the International Division of Pitney Bowes Inc. from 2005 to 2010. Mr. Keddy holds a Bachelor of Science in Administrative Science from the University of Aston in Birmingham, UK and is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Marketing.

Theodore MacLean
Age 51


Mr. MacLean was appointed executive vice president, chief marketing officer of the Company in September 2014. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. MacLean served as general manager, emerging market strategies and sales at Microsoft Corporation from May 2011 to September 2014. From October 2008 to May 2011, Mr. MacLean served as general manager, open solutions group at Microsoft Corporation. Mr. MacLean holds a Bachelor of Arts from Carleton College and a Master of Business Administration from the Anderson School at the University of California, Los Angeles.

Eileen Sweeney
Age 49


Ms. Sweeney was appointed senior vice president and general manager, data management of the Company in August 2014. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Sweeney served as vice president and general manager of the global manufacturing industry for Computer Sciences Corporation, or CSC, from June 2012 to July 2014. From 2010 to June 2012, Ms. Sweeney served as president of the general dynamics account for CSC. From 2007 to 2010, Ms. Sweeney served as global president of the manufacturing sector for CSC. Ms. Sweeney holds a Bachelor of Science from Union College and a Master of Business Administration and Master of Science in Industrial Engineering from Northwestern University.

Name
Principal Occupations and Business Experience During the Past Five Years
John Tomovcsik
Age 48
Mr. Tomovcsik was appointed executive vice president and general manager, records and information management of the Company in January 2014. From January 2007 to December 2013, Mr. Tomovcsik served as executive vice president and chief operating officer, Iron Mountain North America, responsible for the operations of the Company's Records Management, Document Management Solutions, Data Management and Secure Shredding core businesses.

Anastasios Tsolakis
Age 59


Mr. Tsolakis was appointed executive vice president, global services and chief information officer of the Company in September 2011. Mr. Tsolakis served as executive vice president and chief information officer of the Company since joining the Company in September 2010. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Tsolakis served as chief information officer from July 2008 to August 2010 at Affiliated Computer Services, Inc., a publicly held company that was acquired in 2009 by Xerox Corporation. Mr. Tsolakis holds a Bachelor of Science degree in electrical engineering from Wilkes University, a Masters of Business Administration from The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania and a Ph.D. and Master of Science degree in electrical engineering from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

Board of Directors and Committees

        Independence.
GOVERNANCE

Independence

        Our Board is composed of a majority of directors who qualify as independent directors pursuant to the corporate governance standards for companies listed on the NYSE. The Board evaluates independence pursuant to NYSE standards each year by affirmatively determining whether each director has a direct or indirect material relationship with the Company (including its subsidiaries) and members of the Company's management that may interfere with such director's ability to exercise his or her independence from the Company. When assessing the materiality of a director's relationship with the Company, the Board considers all relevant facts and circumstances, not merely from the director's standpoint but from that of the persons or organizations with which the director has an affiliation. Material relationships can include commercial, industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable and familial relationships. None of our independent directors (other than Mr. Deninger) has any relationship with the Company or its management other than his or her service as a director and on committees of the Board, and the Board has concluded that none of the Company's directors possess the objective relationships set forth in the NYSE listing standards that prevent independence.

        In assessingWhen evaluating the independence of Mr. Deninger,director nominees, the Board considered Mr. Deninger's position as a senior managingweighs numerous factors, including the effect of multiple years of service on the ability of our director at Evercore Partners Inc., or Evercore.nominees to maintain independence. In 2013particular, the Company entered into an agreementBoard weighed the potential impact of tenure on the independence of our two longest serving directors, Messrs. Bailey and Dauten. Messrs. Bailey and Dauten have significant experience serving on the Board under different operating environments and with Evercore pursuantdifferent management teams, including under two prior chief executive officers. The Board concluded that Messrs. Bailey and Dauten continue to which Evercore agreed to provide financial advisory services tobe effective directors who fulfill their responsibilities with integrity and independence of thought. Therefore, the Company, as further described under the "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" section of this Proxy Statement. In 2015 the Company paid the final $250,000 of fees associated with the agreement with Evercore. The agreement with Evercore has terminated in accordance with its terms. The Board determined that because Mr. Deninger agreed to waive any direct fees he may receive in connection with the Evercore engagement and did not work on the engagement on behalf of Evercore, this relationship would not interfere with Mr. Deninger's ability to exercisetheir independence from the Company.management has not been diminished by their years of service.

        The Board has determined that all of our non-management directors who served in 2017 qualify as independent under NYSE rules.rules, including Mr. Chatfield who resigned effective September 8, 2017. One of our directors, Mr. Meaney, is a management employee involved in our day-to-day activities and is not considered to be an independent director.


        Attendance.    During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, the Board held 13 meetings. Each incumbent director attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board and all committees thereof on which such director served that were held during the period for which such director served. Mr. Chatfield and Ms. Murdock are expected to join the Board on May 2, 2016 and did not attend any Board and committee meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. All of our directors standing for re-election at the time attended our 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. All directors standing for re-election are expected to attend the Annual Meeting, either in person or by teleconference. Our policy with respect to directors' attendance at our annual meetings of stockholders can be found in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the full text of which appears under the heading "Company/Investors/Corporate Governance" on our website at www.ironmountain.com.

Board Leadership Structure

        The Board does not have a formal policy as toon whether the roles of Chairman and CEO should be combined or separated. The Board believes that Iron Mountain stockholders are best served by the Board having flexibility to consider the relevant facts and circumstances and determine, at the time of the Chairman's election, the best leadership structure for the Company rather than by adhering to a formal standing policy on the subject.

        As a result of the Board's ongoing review of its leadership structure, theThe Board has determined that the position of Chairman should be held by a non-employee of the Company. The Board believes that the current leadership structure, which separates the roles of CEO and Independent Chairman, fosters effective governance and oversight of the Company. The Independent Chairman controls the Board meeting agendas, which ensures that topics deemed important by the independent directors are included in Board discussions and best enables the Board to express its views on our management, strategy and execution. The Independent Chairman is responsible for advising the CEO and presiding over meetings of the Board, presiding over all executive sessions of non-management directors, consulting with the CEO on Board meeting agendas and acting as a liaison between management and non-management directors. The CEO is responsible for setting the Company's strategy and leading the organization's day-to-day performance. We believe this governance structure promotes balance between the authority of those who oversee our business and those who manage it on a day-to-day basis.


Table of Contents

        The Board convenes in non-management executive session before the conclusion of each in-person Board meeting, and an executive session is offered in all telephonic Board meetings.

Board Meetings and Committees

        Board Meeting Attendance.    During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, the Board held eight meetings. Each incumbent director attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board and all committees thereof on which such director served that were held during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. All of our directors standing for re-election in 2017 attended our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Our policy with respect to directors' attendance at our annual meetings of stockholders can be found in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the full text of which appears under the heading "Company/Investors/Corporate Governance" on our website at www.ironmountain.com.

        Board Committees.    The Board has the following standing committees: Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating and Governance Committee, Finance Committee and Risk and Safety Committee. The Board and management have assigned specific areas of risk oversight to each standing committee. The Board has adopted a charter for each of its standing committees, and each such charter is available on our website at www.ironmountain.com under the heading "Company/Investors/"Investors/Corporate Governance." During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015,2017, the Audit Committee held sixseven meetings, the Compensation Committee held sixseven meetings, the Nominating and Governance Committee held five meetings, the Finance Committee held nineeight meetings and the Risk and Safety Committee held sixfour meetings.

        The Nominating and Governance Committee annually reviews the composition of the Board committees and considers whether to recommend committee membership changes to the Board. In 2015As part of this process in 2017, the NominatingBoard added new directors to committees and Governance Committee, in an effort to promote continuity, did not recommend anymade other changes. Each committee membership changes.also maintained several of its existing members for continuity.

        Membership on each committee as of April 15, 201620, 2018 is set forth in the chart below.



Committee Membership

 
 Audit
Committee
 Compensation
Committee
 Nominating
and
Governance
Committee
 Finance
Committee
 Risk and
Safety
Committee

Alfred J. Verrecchia(1)

     ü*    

Jennifer Allerton

 ü       ü

Ted R. Antenucci

 ü     ü  

Pamela M. Arway

   ü* ü    

Clarke H. Bailey

   ü ü   ü*

Kent P. Dauten

 ü   ü ü*  

Paul F. Deninger

   ü ü

Per-Kristian Halvorsen

   ü     ü

William L. Meaney

         ü

Wendy J. Murdock

üü

Walter C. Rakowich

 ü*   ü    

(1)
Chairman of the Board

*
Committee Chair

Upon the consummation of the Company's acquisition of Recall, each of Mr. Chatfield's appointment to the Board and Ms. Murdock's appointment to the Board will become effective. Mr. Chatfield is expected to join the Audit Committee and the Risk and Safety Committee, and Ms. Murdock is expected to join the Compensation Committee and the Finance Committee.

        Audit Committee.    Each member of the Audit Committee is independent as defined by the rules of the SEC, the NYSE listing standards and the Audit Committee Charter. In addition, the Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is an audit committee financial expert as


Table of Contents

defined by the rules of the SEC and is financially literate as defined by the NYSE listing standards. The Audit Committee: (1) assists the Board in oversight of the integrity of the Company's financial statements; (2) assists the Board in oversight of the Company's compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; (3) assists the Board in the oversight of the Company's compliance with requirements with respect to maintaining the Company's qualification for taxation as a REIT; (4) assists the Board in oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm's retention, qualifications and independence; (4)(5) assists the Board in oversight of the performance of the Company's internal audit function and independent auditors; (5)(6) prepares an Audit Committee report as required by the SEC to be included in the annual Proxy Statement; (6)(7) reviews and evaluates the lead audit partner of the independent registered accounting firm; (8) performs such other duties as the Board may assign to the Audit Committee from time to time, such as approving transactions subject to our Related Person Transaction Policies and Procedures described on page 7318 of this Proxy Statement; and (7)(9) takes other actions to meet its responsibilities as set forth in its written charter. The Audit Committee is also responsible for establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls and auditing matters, including procedures for the confidential and anonymous submission by employees of the Company of any concerns regarding accounting or auditing matters they think may be questionable. Information about these procedures can be found on our website, www.ironmountain.com, under the heading "Company/Investors/Corporate Governance."

        Compensation Committee.    Each member of the Compensation Committee qualifies as independent under the NYSE listing standards. The Compensation Committee: (1) reviews, approves and recommends to the independent members of the Board the annual compensation, including base salary, equity-based incentives and the payment of short-term incentive compensation, for the CEO; (2) approves all long-term equity incentives to our employees, including Messrs. Day, Duale, Meaney and Keddy and Ms. Evens, or, collectively, the Named Executive Officers, under the 2014 Stock and Cash Incentive Plan, as amended, or the 2014 Plan; (3) reviews and approves the annual cashcompensation, including base salary, equity-based incentives and the payment of short-term incentive compensation, for Named Executive Officers (other


than the CEO) based on recommendations from the CEO and reports to the Board on such decisions; (4) reviews the Company's cash and stock-based incentive compensation plans to assess their effectiveness in meeting the Company's goals and objectives and exercises all of the authority of the Board with respect to the administration of such plans; (5) annually reviews and discusses with management a draft of the Company's Compensation Discussion and Analysis to be included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K and annual proxy statement; (6) annually prepares and publishes an annual report of the Compensation Committee for inclusion in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K and annual proxy statement; (7) reviews and discusses at least on an annual basis the risks arising from the Company's compensation policies for its employees; (8) reviews and (8)discusses "pay ratio" disclosure for inclusion in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K and annual proxy statement; and (9) takes other actions to meet its responsibilities as set forth in its written charter.

        The Board has delegated final authority for compensation decisions for the Named Executive Officers, other than our CEO, to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has the authority to delegate any of its responsibilities to a sub-committee composed of members of the Compensation Committee, but it has not done so to date.

        For a discussion concerning the process and procedures for determining executive compensation and the role of executive officers and compensation consultants in determining or recommending the amount or form of compensation, see the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section in this Proxy Statement.

        Nominating and Governance Committee.    Each member of the Nominating and Governance Committee qualifies as independent under the NYSE listing standards. To ensure that the Nominating and Governance Committee has insight into the functioning of the standing committees, each committee chair is a member of the Nominating and Governance Committee. The Nominating and


Table of Contents

Governance Committee: (1) recommends the composition of the Board; (2) identifies and recommends candidates for nomination to the Board; (3) recommends to the Board structures and statements of the duties and responsibilities of each committee of the Board; (4) develops and recommends to the Board and implements corporate governance guidelines applicable to the Company; (5) assists the Board in annually reviewing management succession; (6) develops and monitors an annual process to assess the effectiveness of the Board and implements and oversees an annual review of the performance of the Board (including evaluations of individual Board members) and each of the Board's standing committees; (7)(6) develops and proposes, for approval by the Board, compensation policies for the Company's non-employee directors; (8)(7) annually reviews contributions to candidates made by the Iron Mountain Incorporated Political Action Committee, or IMPAC, and determines the composition of the IMPAC board; (8) annually reviews the Company's Political Contributions Policy and the Company's compliance with that policy; and (9) takes other actions to meet its responsibilities as set forth in its written charter.

        Finance Committee.    Although the NYSE listing standards do not require members of the Finance Committee to be independent, all members of the Finance Committee qualify as independent under the NYSE listing standards and the Board's assessment of any material relationships with the Company. The Finance Committee: (1) reviews and provides recommendations with respect to the Company's capital structure, leverage and financial strategies; (2) reviews the Company's material capital allocation decisions, strategic investments and dispositions and other opportunities for maximizing stockholder value;value and periodically reviews and evaluates the performance of and returns on investments and dispositions approved by the Board; (3) considers, reviews and reviewsprovides recommendations to the Board with respect to the Company's dividend and share repurchase policies and programs and other strategies to return capital to stockholders; (4) reviews and approves the Company's derivatives and hedging policies and strategies; (5) reviews the Company's investment policies and practices; (6) reviews the Company's credit ratings and strategy,strategy; (7) periodically reviews the Company's investor relations strategy,strategy; (8) furnishes periodic reports to the Board concerning the Finance Committee's work; and (9) performs such other duties as the Board may assign to the committee from time to time.

        Risk and Safety Committee.    Although the NYSE listing standards do not require the members of the Risk and Safety Committee to be independent, all members of the Risk and Safety Committee qualify as independent under the NYSE listing standards. The Risk and Safety Committee (1) reviews andbased on reports provided by the Company's management, monitors (A) the adequacy of material fire, health, safety, security, business continuity, cyber security, chain of custody and information security and risk management strategies and systems;systems for the reporting of accidents, incidents and risks, and (B) material investigations and remedial actions, as appropriate; (2) reviews the Company's establishment and monitors material safety, security, business continuity, information security andoperation of its enterprise-wide risk management, policiesor ERM, program which is designed to identify, assess, monitor and processes implemented, establishedmanage risk throughout the Company, and reported on byincludes an annual management ERM report to the Company's


management;Board; (3) monitors the Company's insurance programs;program; and (4) takesexamines any other actionsmatters referred to meet its responsibilities as set forth in its written charter.it by the Board.

Board and Committee Evaluations

        The Nominating and Governance Committee oversees the Board and committee evaluation process. Generally, including in 2015, the Board and each committee conduct self-evaluations by means of written questionnaires completed by each director and committee member. The anonymous responses are summarized and provided to the Board and each committee at their subsequent meetings in order to facilitate an examination and discussion by the Board and each committee of the effectiveness of the Board, committees, individual directors, Board and committee structure and dynamics, and areas for possible improvement. The Nominating and Governance Committee establishes the boardBoard and committee evaluation process each year and may determine to use an independent third party evaluation process from time to time in the future.


Table of Contents

The Board's Role in Risk Oversight

        The Board is responsible for oversight of the Company's management of enterprise risks. Iron Mountain senior management is responsible for the Company's risk management process and the day-to-day supervision and mitigation of enterprise risks. TheWe have a comprehensive risk management program, where our senior executive team is provided regular reports by our operational teams and standing committees on enterprise risk, emerging trends and issues. Our senior executive team reviews and prioritizes significant risks, allocates resources for mitigation and provides the Board receiveswith regular reports on areas of materialpotential Company risk, including strategic, operational, information security, human resources, financial, legal, compliance, REIT and regulatory risks. The Board, or the committee of the Board assigned responsibility for a specific area of risk, receives reportsupdates from the Company executive accountable for understanding and mitigating the identified risk. When a committeeThe chair of the Board receives a risk report, the chairman of sucheach committee provides a summary of the discussion to the Board of such committee's risk discussions during the next regularly scheduled Board meeting. The Board also formally reviews the Company's overall risk position and risk management processes at least annually. This practice allows the Board and each of its committees to remain coordinated in their oversight of enterprise risk. The Risk and Safety Committee provides additional support to the Board in ensuringto ensure that the Company's enterprise risk management program is established appropriatelyincludes the enterprise risk management framework, that the Company's governance structures are appropriate and operating effectively.effectively and to ensure sufficient expertise and continuity between the Board's annual reviews. The key responsibilities of the Risk and Safety Committee and the risk oversight of other committees are further detailed on page 16.

The Board's Role in Management Succession

        The Board oversees the recruitment, development, and retention of executive talent. Management succession is generally discussed at Board meetings throughout the year with the CEO, as well as in executive sessions. Management succession discussions generally focus on the CEO and other senior executive roles and also include broader discussions on the Company's workforce. The Board also has regular and direct exposure to senior leadership and high-potential employees through meetings held throughout the year.

The Board's Role in Setting Compensation and Assessing Compensation Risk

        The Compensation Committee reviews the executive compensation program throughout the year with the assistance of an independent compensation consultant. For a more detailed discussion on this topic, please see the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section of this Proxy Statement.

Code of Ethics

        Our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct applies to each of the Company's employees, including officers, and directors. Our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is posted on our website, www.ironmountain.com, under the heading "Investors/Corporate Governance." A printed copy of our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is also available free of charge to any stockholder who requests a copy. We intend to disclose any amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct applicable to our CEO, chief financial officer or principal accounting officer or controller by posting such information on our website. Any waivers applicable to any other executive officers will also be promptly disclosed to stockholders on our website.

Political Expenditures

        Our Global Political Contribution Policy, together with our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, guide our approach to ethical business behavior and corporate political contributions. Our Global Political Contribution Policy provides that Iron Mountain does not make political contributions in any


Table of Contents

form or amount from corporate funds or resources, even when permitted by applicable law. This means corporate funds are not used in support of or opposition to political candidates, political parties, political committees and other political entities organized and operating for political candidates. In addition, corporate funds are not used for "electioneering" communications.

        The Company administers IMPAC, which is a non-partisan political action committee supporting congressional candidates at the federal level only. IMPAC allows eligible employees to pool their resources to support candidates who understand the issues important to the Company's business and its employees. Participation in IMPAC is strictly voluntary. Except for administrative expenses, IMPAC is funded solely by the Company's employees and directors and is not supported by funds from the Company. IMPAC complies with federal election laws and all other applicable laws and reports regularly to the Federal ElectionsElection Commission. In addition, IMPAC is governed by a set of bylaws and supervised by a board of directors composed of senior managers from different areas of the Company.

        The Company is a member of a number of trade associations that participate in public relations activities such as education and conferences, but not for the purpose of making political contributions. Our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct and our Global Political Contribution Policy are available on our website under the heading "Company/Investors/"Investors/Corporate Governance."


Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

        The Board has adopted a written Related Person Transaction Policies and Procedures, or the Related Persons Policy, which provides that all transactions with related persons are subject to approval or ratification by our Audit Committee. With certain exceptions, the Related Persons Policy provides that the Audit Committee shall review the material facts of all transactions with related persons and either approve or disapprove of the transaction. Under the Related Persons Policy, transactions covered include all transactions involving the Company, amounts in excess of $120,000 and a Related Person (a term that includes executive officers, directors, nominees for election as directors, beneficial owners of 5% or more of the Company's outstanding Common Stock and immediate family members of the foregoing). The Audit Committee will determine whether the terms of a covered transaction are fair to the Company and no less favorable to the Company than would be generally available absent the relationship with the counterparty, whether there are business reasons for the transaction, whether the transaction impairs the independence of an outside director, whether the transaction would represent an improper conflict of interest and whether the transaction is material, among other considerations. In the event that prior approval of a covered transaction is not feasible, the Related Persons Policy provides that a transaction may be approved by the chair of the Audit Committee in accordance with such policy. The chair shall report any such approvals at the next Audit Committee meeting. If the Company becomes aware of a transaction with a Related Person that has not been approved by the Audit Committee prior to its consummation, the Audit Committee shall review such transaction and evaluate all possible options, including ratification, revision or termination of such transaction and shall take such action as it deems appropriate under the circumstances. The Related Persons Policy is intended to supplement, and not supersede, our other policies and procedures with respect to transactions with Related Persons. There were no new transactions with related persons that required the review of our Audit Committee in 2017.

Corporate Responsibility

        We are committed to transparent reporting on sustainability and corporate responsibility efforts in accordance with the guidelines of the Global Reporting Initiative. Our corporate responsibility report highlights our progress against key measures of success for our efforts in the community, our environment, and for our people. We are a trusted partner to approximately 95% of the Fortune 1000. Iron Mountain is a member of the FTSE4 Good Index, Dow Jones Sustainability Index, MSCI World ESG Index, MSCI ACWI ESG Index and MSCI USA IMI ESG Index, each of which include


Table of Contents

companies that meet globally recognized corporate responsibility standards. A copy of our corporate responsibility report is available on the "About Us" section of our website, www.ironmountain.com, under the heading "Corporate Social Responsibility."

Stockholder Communications towith the Board of Directors

        The Board believes it is important to engage effectively with stockholders. To facilitate this engagement, in February 2016, the Board adopted a written Shareholder Engagement and Communication Policy, or the Shareholder Engagement Policy, which outlines the procedures for the Board's engagement and communication with the Company's stockholders. The Shareholder Engagement Policy is overseen by the Nominating and Governance Committee. Under the Shareholder Engagement Policy, any stockholder, CDI holder, security holder or other interested party who desires to communicate with the Board, any individual director, including the Independent Chairman, or the independent or non-management directors as a group, may do so by regular mail or email directed to the Secretary of the Company. Communications to the Board should be mailed to Corporate Secretary, Iron Mountain Incorporated, One Federal Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02110; the Secretary's email address is corporatesecretary@ironmountain.com. Upon receiving such mail or email, the Secretary will assess the appropriate director or directors to receive the message and will forward the mail or email to such director or directors without editing or altering it.

Selection of Board of Directors Nominees

        The Board is responsible for developing and approving criteria, in addition to those set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, for candidates for Board membership. The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for seeking candidates to become Board members, consistent with the criteria set forth in the Corporate Governance Guidelines and approved by the Board, and for recommending candidates to the entire Board for selection by the Board for nomination to fill vacancies on the Board or expiring terms of directors at each annual meeting of stockholders. The Board as a whole is responsible for nominating individuals for election to the Board by the stockholders and for filling vacancies on the Board that may occur between annual meetings of the stockholders.

        Nominees for director will be selected on the basis of their integrity, experience, achievements, judgment, intelligence, personal character, ability to make independent analytical inquiries, willingness to devote adequate time to Board duties and likelihood that they will be able to serve on the Board for a sustained period. In connection with the selection of nominees for director, the Board's policy is to give due consideration to the Board's overall balance of diversity of perspectives, backgrounds and experiences. To implement and review the effectiveness of our diversity policy, the Nominating and Governance Committee reviews the appropriate skills and characteristics of members of the Board in the context of the then current composition of the Board. It is the practice of the Nominating and Governance Committee to then consider these factors when screening and evaluating candidates for nomination or re-election to the Board. The Board will not nominate for election as director any candidate who has not agreed to tender, promptly following the annual meeting at which he or she is elected as director, an irrevocable resignation that will be effective upon (1) the failure to receive the required number of votes for re-election at the next annual meeting of stockholders at which he or she faces re-election, and (2) acceptance of such resignation by the Board.

        The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider, as part of the process for identifying individuals who might be candidates, individuals who are properly recommended by stockholders for nomination by the Board at a meeting of stockholders at which directors are to be elected. To be proper, a recommendation for a nominee for director with respect to a meeting of stockholders must comply with applicable law, the Company's Bylaws and the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider any suggestions offered by other


Table of Contents

directors or stockholders with respect to potential directors, and there will be no difference in the manner in which potential nominees are evaluated. However, the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Board are not required to enlarge the size of the Board in order to nominate an otherwise fully qualified candidate proposed by a stockholder. A stockholder wishing to nominate a


director directly must comply with the procedures described in the Company's Bylaws and this Proxy Statement.

        In 2015 the Nominating and Governance Committee did not retain the services of, and did not pay a fee to, any third party to identify or assist in identifying or evaluating potential nominees to our Board.

Nominations and Proposals of Stockholders

        A stockholder who, in accordance with Rule 14a-8, or Rule 14a-8, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, wants to present a proposal for inclusion in the Company's 20172019 Proxy Statement and proxy card relating to the 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must submit the proposal by December 28, 2016.29, 2018. In order for the proposal to be included in the Proxy Statement, the stockholder submitting the proposal must meet certain eligibility standards and comply with certain regulations established by the SEC.

        Stockholders who wish to present a business proposal or nominate persons for election as directors at the Company's 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must provide a notice of the business proposal or nomination in accordance with Section 2.4 of our Bylaws, in the case of business proposals, or Section 3.2 of our Bylaws, in the case of director nominations. In order to be properly brought before the 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, Sections 2.4 and 3.2 of our Bylaws require that a notice of the business proposal the stockholder wishes to present (other than a matter brought pursuant to Rule 14a-8), or the person or persons the stockholder wishes to nominate as a director, must be received at our principal executive office not less than 90 days, and not more than 120 days, prior to the first anniversary of the Company's prior year's annual meeting. Therefore, any notice intended to be given by a stockholder with respect to the Company's 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to our Bylaws must be received at our principal executive office no earlier than February 17, 201715, 2019 and no later than March 19, 2017.17, 2019. However, if the date of our 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders occurs more than 30 days before or 30 days after June 17, 2017,14, 2019, the anniversary of the 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, a stockholder notice will be timely if it is received at our principal executive office by the later of (1) the 120th120th day prior to such annual meeting or (2) the close of business on the tenth day following the day on which public disclosure of the date of the meeting was made. To be in proper form, a stockholder's notice must include the specified information concerning the stockholder and the business proposal or nominee, as described in Sections 2.4, 3.2 and 3.3 of our Bylaws.

        All proposals must be mailed to the Company's principal executive office, at the address stated herein, and should be directed to the attention of the Secretary of the Company.

Code of EthicsExecutive Officers

        Our CodeThe Board annually elects the officers of Ethics and Business Conduct applies to eachthe Company. Each officer holds office at the discretion of the Board until the first meeting of the Board following the next annual meeting of stockholders or until such officer sooner dies, resigns or is removed. There are no family relationships between or among any of the Company's employees, including officers or directors.

        Set forth below is the name and directors. Our Codeage of Ethics and Business Conduct is posted on our website, www.ironmountain.com, under the heading "Company/Investors/Corporate Governance." A printed copyeach of our Codeexecutive officers who is not nominated to be a director of Ethics and Business Conduct is also available free of charge to any stockholder who requests a copy. We intend to disclose any amendment to,the Company, or, waiver from, a provision of our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct applicable totogether with our CEO, chief financial officerour Executive Officers, his or her principal accounting officeroccupation and business experience during the past five years and the names of certain other companies of which he or controller by posting such information on our website. Any waivers applicable to any other executive officers will also be promptly disclosed to stockholders on our website.she served as a director, as of April 20, 2018.


Table of Contents

Name
Principal Occupations and Business Experience During the Past Five Years
Peter Allen
Age 57
Mr. Allen was appointed senior vice president and general manager, data management of the Company in February 2018. Mr. Allen served as senior vice president, cloud services of the Company from October 2017 to February 2018. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Allen served as President of Digital Management, Inc., responsible for global commercial business, from September 2016 to September 2017. Mr. Allen served as a consultant for Peter Allen & Partners, LLC from February 2016 to September 2016. From September 2013 to February 2016, Mr. Allen served as managing director, enterprise services of Alvarez & Marsal. From September 2009 to June 2013, Mr. Allen served as executive vice president, global sales and marketing of Computer Sciences Corp. Mr. Allen holds a Bachelor of Science degree in computer science from the University of Maryland.

Edward Bicks
Age 49


Mr. Bicks was appointed chief strategy officer of the Company in February 2016, in addition to his role as senior vice president. From April 2015 to February 2016, Mr. Bicks served as senior vice president, chief strategy officer and emerging businesses, of the Company. From September 2013 to April 2015, Mr. Bicks served as a senior vice president of the Company. From December 2012 to September 2013, Mr. Bicks served as senior vice president, strategy and change management at Forrester Research, Inc., or Forrester. From May 2005 to September 2013, Mr. Bicks served as vice president, strategy at Forrester. Mr. Bicks holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in economics from Williams College and a Master of Business Administration degree from the MIT Sloan School of Management.

Daniel Borges
Age 49


Mr. Borges was appointed senior vice president, chief accounting officer in March 2018. Mr. Borges was appointed chief accounting officer in October 2017, in addition to his role as vice president. From June 2014 to October 2017, Mr. Borges served as vice president and global controller of the Company. From January 2009 to June 2014, Mr. Borges served as vice president, external reporting of the Company. From June 2002 to January 2009, Mr. Borges served as director, external reporting of the Company. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Borges held various positions at Arthur Andersen LLP from September 1990 to June 2002. Mr. Borges holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from Babson College and is a Certified Public Accountant in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

Stuart Brown
Age 52


Mr. Brown joined the Company in June 2016 and assumed the role of executive vice president and chief financial officer in August 2016. Prior to joining the Company, from September 2011 to June 2016, Mr. Brown served as executive vice president and chief financial officer of Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc., a publicly held chain of casual dining restaurants. From October 2006 to September 2011, Mr. Brown served as chief financial officer for DCT Industrial Trust Inc., a publicly held industrial REIT. Mr. Brown holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree and a Master of Accountancy from the University of Georgia.

Table of Contents

Name
Principal Occupations and Business Experience During the Past Five Years
Ernest W. Cloutier
Age 45
Mr. Cloutier assumed the role of executive vice president and general manager, international of the Company in April 2017. From June 2014 to December 2016, Mr. Cloutier served as executive vice president, U.S. federal, security and legal, of the Company. In addition, Mr. Cloutier served as the Company's general counsel and secretary until December 2016, positions which he held since joining the Company in December 2007 as a senior vice president. In June 2011 Mr. Cloutier was appointed an executive vice president of the Company, and Mr. Cloutier assumed responsibility for the Company's global security and risk organizations in March 2014. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Cloutier served as senior vice president, general counsel and secretary for Digitas Inc. from May 2004 to November 2007. Mr. Cloutier holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in political science from Bates College and a Juris Doctor from The American University Washington College of Law.

Deirdre Evens
Age 54


Ms. Evens was appointed executive vice president and chief of operations of the Company in February 2018. From July 2015 to February 2018, Ms. Evens served as executive vice president, chief people officer of the Company. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Evens served as executive vice president of human resources at Clean Harbors, Inc., or Clean Harbors, from September 2011 to July 2015. From June 2008 to September 2011, Ms. Evens served as executive vice president of sales and marketing at Clean Harbors. Ms. Evens holds a Bachelor of Science degree in mechanical engineering from Cornell University.

Raymond Fox
Age 63


Mr. Fox was appointed executive vice president and chief risk officer of the Company in February 2018. Mr. Fox joined the Company as senior vice president, strategic business development in July 2015. Previously, Mr. Fox served in the United States Marine Corps for 37 years. Mr. Fox is a graduate of the Australian Army Command and Staff College and the U.S. Army War College, and earned a Master's degree in Strategic Studies from the U.S. Army War College, a Master's in Public Administration from Shippensburg University (Pennsylvania) and a Bachelor of Arts in political science from Eastern Washington University.

Patrick Keddy
Age 63


Mr. Keddy was appointed executive vice president and general manager, North America and Western Europe of the Company in April 2015. Mr. Keddy joined the Company as senior vice president, Western Europe, in November 2011, responsible for the operations of the Company's Records Management, Document Management Solutions, Data Management and Secure Shredding businesses in Western Europe. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Keddy served as President of the International Division of Pitney Bowes Inc. from 2005 to 2010. Mr. Keddy holds a Bachelor of Science degree in administrative science from the University of Aston in Birmingham, United Kingdom and is a Member of the Chartered Institute of Marketing.

Mark Kidd
Age 38


Mr. Kidd was appointed senior vice president and general manager, data centers in April 2013. Mr. Kidd served as senior vice president, enterprise strategy from January 2010 to April 2013. Mr. Kidd served in various other positions with the Company in corporate strategy, portfolio and capital management from September 2003 to January 2010. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Kidd worked in investment banking at Thomas Weisel Partners. Mr. Kidd holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in economics from Harvard University.

Table of Contents

Name
Principal Occupations and Business Experience During the Past Five Years
Theodore MacLean
Age 53
Mr. MacLean was appointed executive vice president, adjacent businesses of the Company in February 2018. From September 2014 to February 2018, Mr. MacLean served as executive vice president and chief marketing officer of the Company. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. MacLean served as general manager, emerging market strategies and sales, at Microsoft Corporation, a publicly held multinational technology company, or Microsoft, from May 2011 to September 2014. From October 2008 to May 2011, Mr. MacLean served as general manager, open solutions group at Microsoft. Mr. MacLean holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from Carleton College and a Master of Business Administration degree from the Anderson School at the University of California, Los Angeles.

Deborah Marson
Age 64


Ms. Marson was appointed executive vice president, general counsel and secretary of the Company in December 2016. Ms. Marson served as senior vice president and deputy general counsel from March 2012 to December 2016. Ms. Marson joined the Company as vice president of commercial contracts for North America in November 2009. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Marson spent 27 years with The Gillette Company, where she most recently served as deputy general counsel. Ms. Marson holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in political science from Colby College and a Juris Doctor from Suffolk University Law School.

Fidelma Russo
Age 54


Ms. Russo was appointed executive vice president and chief technology officer of the Company in March 2017. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Russo served as senior vice president and general manager at Dell EMC from January 2011 to March 2017, where she led Dell EMC's enterprise storage and software solutions team. From May 2010 to January 2011, Ms. Russo served as chief operating officer of Sepaton, Inc., or Sepaton, a privately held provider of storage and software products and services. From September 2007 to May 2010, Ms. Russo served as executive vice president, engineering and development at Sepaton. Ms. Russo holds a Bachelor in engineering from University College Cork, Ireland, and a Master of Science in computer science from Boston University.

John Tomovcsik
Age 50


Mr. Tomovcsik was appointed executive vice president and general manager, records and information management, of the Company in January 2014. From January 2007 to December 2013, Mr. Tomovcsik served as executive vice president and chief operating officer, Iron Mountain North America, responsible for the operations of the Company's Records Management, Document Management Solutions, Data Management and Secure Shredding core businesses.

Table of Contents


ITEMPROPOSAL 2


ADVISORY VOTE ON THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

        In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act and related rules of the SEC, we are including this separate proposal subject to stockholder votefor stockholders to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers listed in the "SummarySummary Compensation Table"Table appearing inon page 69 of this Proxy Statement, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K.Statement.

        Our executive compensation is designed to reward executive performance that contributes to our success while encouraging behavior that is in our and our stockholders' long-term best interests. We also seek to attract, motivate, reward and retain the senior management talent required to achieve our corporate objectives and increase stockholder value. At the core of our executive compensation programs is our "pay for performance" philosophy that links competitive levels of compensation to achievements of our overall strategy and business goals, as well as predetermined objectives. We believe our compensation program is strongly aligned with the interests of our stockholders and sound corporate governance principles. We urge you to read the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section of this Proxy Statement and compensation tables and narrative discussion in this Proxy Statement for additional details on our executive compensation, including our compensation philosophy and objectives and the compensation of our Named Executive Officers.

        The vote on this proposal is not intended to address any specific element of compensation; rather, the vote relates to the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, as described in this Proxy Statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC. To the extent there is any significant vote against the compensation paid to the Named Executive Officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, the Compensation Committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address the concerns of stockholders.

        Based on the above, we request that you indicate your support for our executive compensation philosophy and practices by voting to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the following resolution:

        "RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company's Named Executive Officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion in the Proxy Statement for the 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, is hereby APPROVED."

Required Vote

        The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes properly cast at the Annual Meeting is required to approve the advisory vote on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, as described in the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section of this Proxy Statement, the compensation tables and the other narrative compensation disclosures contained in this Proxy Statement. For the purpose of determining whether a majority of the votes has been cast in favor of the approval of this resolution, only those cast "For" or "Against" are included, and any abstentions or broker non-votes will not count in making that determination. The opportunity to vote on this resolution is required pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act. However, as an advisory vote, the vote on this resolution is not binding upon the Company and serves only as a recommendation to ourthe Board. Nonetheless, the Compensation Committee, which is responsible for designing and administering our executive compensation programs, and the Board value the opinions expressed by stockholders and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions for our Named Executive Officers.named executive officers.


        Our current policy is to provide stockholders with an opportunity to approve the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers each year at our annual meeting of stockholders. We currently expect that the next such vote will occur at our 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

        The Board recommends that you vote FOR the approval of the foregoing non-binding, advisory resolution approving the compensation of our Named Executive Officers.


Table of Contents


ITEMPROPOSAL 3


RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

        Subject to ratification by the stockholders, the Audit Committee has selected the firm of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for 2018.

        The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the Company's independent auditors for the purpose of preparing or issuing audit reports or performing other audit reviews or test services. Our independent auditors report directly to the Audit Committee, and the Audit Committee has executive sessions with the independent auditors at each regularly scheduled Audit Committee meeting.

        The Audit Committee evaluates the performance of the Company's independent auditors each year and determines whether to reengage the current year.independent auditors or consider other audit firms. In doing so, the Audit Committee considers the quality and efficiency of the services provided by the auditors and the auditors' technical expertise and knowledge of the Company's operations and industry. In accordance with the Audit Committee charter, the Audit Committee also evaluates the independence of the independent auditors and discusses with the auditor its independence from the Company and its management. The Audit Committee also oversees compliance with the mandated five-year rotation of the independent auditors' lead engagement partner and reviews and evaluates the lead audit partner, and the chair of the Audit Committee is directly involved in the selection of any new lead engagement partner.

        Based on this evaluation, the Audit Committee has appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP to serve as independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018. Deloitte & Touche LLP has served as the Company's independent auditors since 2003 and is considered by management and the Audit Committee to be well qualified. Further, the Audit Committee and the Board believe that the continued retention of Deloitte & Touche LLP to serve as the independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

        The Audit Committee has determined to submit its selection of the independent auditors to the Company's stockholders for ratification. This vote will ratify prior action by the Audit Committee and will not be binding upon the Audit Committee. However, the Audit Committee may reconsider its prior appointment of the independent auditors or consider the results of this vote when it determines to appoint the Company's independent auditors in the future.

        The Audit Committee oversees and is ultimately responsible for the outcome of audit fee negotiations associated with the Company's retention of its independent auditors. The fees we paid to Deloitte & Touche LLP in 2017 are shown in the table appearing on page 84 of this Proxy Statement.

        Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting. They will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders who are present at the Annual Meeting.

        The fees we paid to Deloitte & Touche LLP in 2015 are shown in the table appearing on page 75 of this Proxy Statement.

If the stockholders do not ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, the selection of accountants will be reconsidered by the Audit Committee.

Required Vote

        The affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the votes properly cast at the Annual Meeting is required to ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP to serve as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year. For purposes of determining the number of votes cast, only those cast "For" or "Against" are included, and any abstentions will not count in making that determination.

        The Board recommends that you vote FOR the ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP.


Table of Contents


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

        The following table sets forth certain information known to the Company with respect to beneficial ownership of Common Stock by: (1) each director and nominee for director; (2) the Named Executive Officers; (3) all directors and executive officersExecutive Officers of the Company as a group; and (4) each stockholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Common Stock. Such information is presented as of March 31, 2016,2018, except as otherwise noted.

 
 Amount of Beneficial
Ownership(1)
 
Name and Addresses(2)
 Shares Percent Owned 

Directors and Named Executive Officers

       

Jennifer Allerton(3)

  6,562  * 

Ted R. Antenucci(4)

  9,786  * 

Pamela M. Arway(5)

  8,401  * 

Clarke H. Bailey(6)

  228,906  * 

Neil Chatfield(7)

  0  * 

Kent P. Dauten(8)

  2,218,640  1.0%

Roderick Day(9)

  92,565  * 

Paul F. Deninger(10)

  49,280  * 

Marc A. Duale(11)

  112,822  * 

Deirdre Evens(12)

  0  * 

Per-Kristian Halvorsen(13)

  17,197  * 

Patrick J. Keddy(14)

  67,228  * 

William L. Meaney(15)

  660,405  * 

Wendy J. Murdock(16)

  0  * 

Walter C. Rakowich(17)

  5,067  * 

Alfred J. Verrecchia(18)

  29,934  * 

All directors and executive officers as a group(19)

  4,034,585  1.8%

Five Percent Stockholders:

  
 
  
 
 

The Vanguard Group(20)

  30,793,809  14.6%

Capital World Investors(21)

  22,148,914  10.5%

Vincent J. Ryan(22)

  15,425,080  7.3%

T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.(23)

  14,855,974  7.0%

Capital International Investors(24)

  14,656,924  6.9%

Blackrock Inc.(25)

  13,294,196  6.3%

Parnassus Investments(26)

  11,417,308  5.4%
 
 Amount of Beneficial
Ownership(1)
 
Name and Addresses(2)
 Shares Percent Owned 

Directors:

       

Jennifer Allerton

  13,154  * 

Ted R. Antenucci(3)

  9,786  * 

Pamela M. Arway

  15,809  * 

Clarke H. Bailey(4)

  210,336  * 

Kent P. Dauten(5)

  2,046,601  * 

Paul F. Deninger(6)

  56,688  * 

Per-Kristian Halvorsen(7)

  23,671  * 

William L. Meaney(8)

  1,451,287  * 

Wendy J. Murdock(9)

  11,227  * 

Walter C. Rakowich

  17,676  * 

Alfred J. Verrecchia(10)

  34,933  * 

Named Executive Officers:

       

Stuart Brown(11)

  31,641  * 

Ernest W. Cloutier(12)

  139,409  * 

Marc A. Duale(13)

  5,315  * 

Patrick J. Keddy(14)

  77,946  * 

Fidelma Russo(15)

  19,919  * 

Eileen Sweeney(16)

  2,104  * 

All directors and Executive Officers as a group(17)

  4,572,745  1.6%

Five Percent Stockholders:

       

The Vanguard Group(18)

  47,689,458  16.9%

Capital World Investors(19)

  29,841,380  10.6%

Blackrock Inc.(20)

  20,610,637  7.3%

*
Less than 1%

(1)
Except as otherwise indicated, the persons named in the table above have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of Common Stock shown as beneficially owned by them.

(2)
Unless specified otherwise, the address of each of our directors, nominees for director and Named Executive Officers is c/o Iron Mountain Incorporated, One Federal Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02110.

(3)
Ms. Allerton is a director of the Company.

(4)
Mr. Antenucci is a director of the Company. Does not include the 20,029.743230,121 vested shares of phantom stock previously reported on Forms 4 filed with the SEC as of March 31, 2016.2018. Shares of phantom stock, or Phantom Shares, have been acquired pursuant to the Iron Mountain

(5)
Ms. Arway is a director of Phantom Shares will become payable in Common Stock on various dates selected by Mr. Antenucci or as otherwise provided in the Company.DDCP.

(6)(4)
Mr. Bailey is a director of the Company. Includes 12,409 shares of Common Stock held by the Clarke H. Bailey GST Trust for the benefit of Trent S. Bailey and 12,409 shares of Common Stock held by the Clarke H. Bailey GST Trust for

Table of Contents

(8)(5)
Mr. Dauten is a director of the Company. Consists of 2,175,9182,000,000 shares of Common Stock held in a joint securities account and 42,72233,924 shares of Common Stock that Mr. Dauten has the right to acquire pursuant to currently exercisable options or options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2016.2018.

(9)(6)
Mr. Day is executive vice president, chief financial officer of the Company. Includes 68,793 shares that Mr. Day has the right to acquire pursuant to currently exercisable options or options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2016.

(10)
Mr. Deninger is a director of the Company. Includes 13,390 shares of Common Stock that Mr. Deninger has the right to acquire pursuant to currently exercisable options or options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2016.2018.

(11)(7)
Does not include the 16,898 vested Phantom Shares previously reported on Forms 4 filed with the SEC as of March 31, 2018. Phantom Shares will become payable in Common Stock on various dates selected by Mr. Duale is president, Iron Mountain International. Halvorsen or as otherwise provided in the DDCP.

(8)
Includes 49,1101,338,627 shares of Common Stock that Mr. DualeMeaney has the right to acquire pursuant to currently exercisable options or options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2016.2018.

(12)(9)
Ms. Evens is executive vice president and chief people officerIncludes 3,547 CDIs trading on the Australian Securities Exchange. Each CDI represents a beneficial interest in one share of the Company.Common Stock.

(13)(10)
Includes 18,290 shares of Common Stock that Mr. Halvorsen is a directorVerrecchia has the right to acquire pursuant to currently exercisable options or options exercisable within 60 days of the Company.March 31, 2018. Does not include the 14,060.460331,112 vested Phantom Shares previously reported on Forms 4 filed with the SEC as of March 31, 2016.2018. Phantom Shares will become payable in Common Stock on various dates selected by Mr. Verrecchia or as otherwise provided in the DDCP.

(11)
Includes 25,438 shares of Common Stock that Mr. Brown has the right to acquire pursuant to currently exercisable options or options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2018.

(12)
Includes 88,035 shares of Common Stock that Mr. Cloutier has the right to acquire pursuant to currently exercisable options or options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2018.

(13)
Mr. Duale ceased to be one of our executive officers on March 31, 2017.

(14)
Mr. Keddy is executive vice president and general manager, North America and Western EuropeIncludes 50,416 shares of the Company. Includes 57,245 sharesCommon Stock that Mr. Keddy has the right to acquire pursuant to currently exercisable options or options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2016.2018. Includes 1,488 Restricted Stock Units, or8,876 RSUs that will vest within 60 days of March 31, 2016.2018. Each RSU represents a contingent right to receive one share of Common Stock.

(15)
Mr. Meaney is CEO and a directorIncludes 12,291 shares of the Company. Includes 586,432 sharesCommon Stock that Mr. MeaneyMs. Russo has the right to acquire pursuant to currently exercisable options or options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2016.2018.

(16)
Ms. Murdock's appointmentSweeney ceased to the Board will become effective in connectionbe one of our executive officers on October 5, 2017. This information is as of October 5, 2017 and is based solely on a Form 4 filed by Ms. Sweeney with the consummation of the Company's acquisition of Recall, which is expected to be completedSEC on May 2, 2016.June 7, 2017.

(17)
Mr. Rakowich is a directorIncludes 1,907,779 shares of the Company. Does not include the 9,298.7342 vested Phantom Shares previously reported on Forms 4 filed with the SEC as of March 31, 2016.

(18)
Mr. Verrecchia is a director of the Company. Includes 18,290 shares that Mr. Verrecchia has the right to acquire pursuant to currently exercisable options or options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2016. Does not include the 20,923.5474 vested Phantom Shares previously reported on Forms 4 filed with the SEC as of March 31, 2016.

(19)
Includes 1,270,963 sharesCommon Stock that directors and executive officersExecutive Officers have the right to acquire pursuant to currently exercisable options or options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2016.2018. Includes 1,4888,876 RSUs granted to directors and executive officersExecutive Officers that will vest within 60 days of March 31, 2016.2018. Does not include the 113,390 vested Phantom Shares previously reported by directors on Forms 4 filed with the SEC as of March 31, 2018.

(20)(18)
This amount includes 17,836,994 shares of common stock beneficially owned by the Vanguard Specialized Funds—Vanguard REIT Index Fund, or the REIT Index Fund. This information is as of December 31, 20152017 and is based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed by The Vanguard Group with the SEC on February 10, 2016,9, 2018, or The Vanguard Group Schedule 13G, and a Schedule 13G/A filed

Table of Contents

(21)(19)
This information is as of December 31, 20152017 and is based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed by Capital World Investors with the SEC on February 12, 2016,14, 2018, or the Capital World Investors Schedule 13G/A. In accordance with the disclosures set forth in the Capital World Investors Schedule 13G/A, Capital World Investors reports sole voting power and sole dispositive power over 22,148,914 shares.29,841,380 shares of Common Stock. The percent owned is based on the calculation provided by Capital World Investors in the Capital World Investors Schedule 13G/A. Based on the information provided in the Capital World Investors Schedule 13G/A, the address of Capital World Investors is 333 South Hope Street, Los Angeles, California 90071.

(22)(20)
This information is as of December 31, 20152017 and is based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed by Mr. Vincent J. Ryan with the SEC on February 2, 2016, or the Ryan Schedule 13G/A. Mr. Ryan is a former director of the Company who retired from the Board effective November 1, 2014. In accordance with the disclosures set forth in the Ryan Schedule 13G/A, Mr. Ryan reports sole voting power over 9,495,881.366 shares and sole dispositive power over 11,907,413.236 shares. The percent owned is based on the calculation provided by Mr. Ryan in the Ryan Schedule 13G/A. Based on the information provided in the Ryan Schedule 13G/A, the address of Mr. Ryan is c/o Schooner Capital LLC, 60 South Street, Suite 1120, Boston, Massachusetts 02111.

(23)
This information is as of December 31, 2015 and is based solely on a Schedule 13G filed by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. with the SEC on February 12, 2016, or the T. Rowe Price Schedule 13G. In accordance with the disclosures set forth in the T. Rowe Price Schedule 13G, T. Rowe Price Associates reports sole voting power over 3,618,010 shares and sole dispositive power over 14,855,974 shares. The percent owned is based on the calculation provided by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. in the T. Rowe Price Schedule 13G. Based on the information provided in the T. Rowe Price Schedule 13G, the address of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. is 100 E. Pratt Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202.

(24)
This information is as of December 31, 2015 and is based solely on a Schedule 13G filed by Capital International Investors with the SEC on February 12, 2016, or the Capital International Investors Schedule 13G. In accordance with the disclosures set forth in the Capital International Investors Schedule 13G, Capital International Investors reports sole voting power over 14,188,506 shares and sole dispositive power over 14,656,924 shares. The percent owned is based on the calculation provided by Capital International Investors in the Capital International Investors Schedule 13G. Based on the information provided in the Capital International Investors Schedule 13G, the address of Capital International Investors is 11100 Santa Monica Boulevard, 16th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90025.

(25)
This information is as of December 31, 2015 and is based solely on a Schedule 13G filed by Blackrock, Inc. with the SEC on January 28, 2016,25, 2018, or the Blackrock Schedule 13G. In accordance with the disclosures set forth in the Blackrock Schedule 13G, Blackrock, Inc. reports sole voting power over 11,578,81618,275,956 shares of Common Stock and sole dispositive power over 13,294,196 shares.20,610,637 shares of Common Stock. The percent

(26)
This information is as of December 31, 2016 and is based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed by Parnassus Investments with the SEC on February 12, 2016, or the Parnassus Schedule 13G/A. In accordance with the disclosures set forth in the Parnassus Schedule 13G/A, Parnassus Investments reports sole voting power and sole dispositive power over 11,417,308 shares. The percent owned is based on the calculation provided by Parnassus Investments in the Parnassus Schedule 13G/A. Based on the information provided in the Parnassus Schedule 13G/A, the address of Parnassus Investments is 1 Market Street, Suite 1600, San Francisco, CA 94105.


Equity Compensation Plan InformationEQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

        The following provides certain equity compensation plan information with respect to all of our equity compensation plans in effect as of December 31, 2015:2017:

Plan Category
 Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise or
settlement of outstanding
options, warrants and
rights
 Weighted average
exercise or
settlement price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
 Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding securities
reflected in first column)
  Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise or
settlement of outstanding
options, warrants and
rights
 Weighted average
exercise or
settlement price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
 Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding securities
reflected in first column)
 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

 5,339,927(1)$29.65(2) 7,510,935(3) 5,210,888(1)$35.04(2) 8,683,858(3)

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

 0 0 0  0 0 0 

Total

 5,339,927 $29.65 7,510,935  5,210,888 $35.04 8,683,858 

(1)
Includes: (i) 3,688,5253,671,608 stock options granted under the Iron Mountain Incorporated 1995 Stock Incentive Plan, the Iron Mountain Incorporated 1997 Stock Option Plan, Iron Mountain Incorporated 2002 Stock Incentive Plan, or the 2002 Plan, and the 2014 Plan; (ii) 1,217,5971,071,469 shares of Common Stock that may be issued upon settlement of outstanding RSUs granted under the 2002 Plan and the 2014 Plan; and (iii) 433,805467,811 shares of Common Stock that may be issued upon settlement of outstanding Performance Units, or PUs granted under the 2002 Plan and the 2014 Plan. Each PU represents a contingent right to receive one share of Common Stock. Excludes stock options to purchase up to 289132 shares of our Common Stock, which stock options, having a weighted average exercise price of $9.97$8.12 per share, were issued pursuant to stock option plans assumed in

Table of Contents

(2)
Weighted average exercise price is calculated inclusive of stock options, RSUs and PUs. For RSUs and PUs, the weighted average exercise price is calculated as the weighted average grant date fair value. If calculated solely for stock options that have an exercise price, the weighted average exercise price of outstanding options at December 31, 20152017 is $27.79$34.41 per share.

(3)
Includes the 2002 Plan, the 2014 Plan and the Iron Mountain Incorporated 2013 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or the 2013 ESPP.

Table of Contents


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Executive Summary

        The primary objectives of our compensation programs are to reward the achievement of both Company and individual goals and to align the interests of our executives with the creation of stockholder value. In keeping with these objectives, our compensation programs are designed to align with the objectives of our strategic plan developed by senior leadership, or the Strategic Plan, and reward teamwork and contribution to the successful achievement of our enterprise goals and financial objectives.

20152017 Developments


(1)
"Developed Markets" include United States, Canada, Western Europe, Australia, and New Zealand.

(2)
"Emerging Markets" include Central and Eastern Europe, Latin America, Africa, and Asia (excluding Australia and New Zealand).

(3)
"Adjacent Businesses" primarily include our entertainment, fine art and consumer storage and services businesses. For the strengtheningpurposes of our Strategic Plan and the U.S. dollar negatively impactedevaluation of performance under our reported resultscompensation programs, "Adjacent Businesses" include our data center business, which was part of our Adjacent Businesses reporting segment until the fourth quarter of 2017, at which time data centers became its own reporting segment.

Table of Contents

Leadership Transition

President, International

        As previously disclosed in our Proxy Statement for our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, effective March 31, 2017, Mr. Marc A. Duale resigned from his role as the Company's President, International, and the Company entered into a separation agreement and a separate advisory agreement with Mr. Duale. The separation agreement provides substantially the same severance benefits as are contained in Mr. Duale's amended and restated employment agreement. Beginning May 1, 2017, in accordance with the terms of the advisory agreement, the Company retained Mr. Duale to provide advisory services to the Company for an initial period of up to 12 months. Mr. Duale continues to provide advisory services to the Company, and the Company extended the term of the advisory agreement through May 1, 2019.

        Further information regarding Mr. Duale's agreements can be found under the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Components of Compensation—Employment Agreements—Marc Duale" and "—Severance Policy—Separation and Advisory Agreements with Marc Duale" sections of this Proxy Statement.

        In connection with Mr. Duale's resignation, Mr. Ernest W. Cloutier assumed the role of Executive Vice President & GM, International. In connection with his new role, Mr. Cloutier began an expatriate assignment on August 1, 2017. Further information regarding Mr. Cloutier's expatriate agreement can be found under the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Components of Compensation—Employment Agreements—Ernest Cloutier" section of this Proxy Statement.

Chief Technology Officer

        Ms. Fidelma Russo joined the Company on March 13, 2017 and assumed the role of Executive Vice President, Chief Technology Officer of the Company. The Compensation Committee approved the following compensation arrangement for Ms. Russo:


Table of Contents

Strategic Plan

        During 2015, we continued to make progress executing onWe developed the Strategic Plan which includes (i)in 2013 to focus our business strategy and increase revenue. The Strategic Plan consists of three core growth and value pillars that drive our business strategygrowth and the value of our business. We refer to generate more income from developed marketsthese three pillars as the growth and higher growth markets and businesses and (ii) enabling activitiesvalue pillars. In addition, the Strategic Plan includes certain initiatives that are designed to improve efficiency and leverage scale to increase our dividend and support the investmentgrowth and execution ofvalue pillars. We refer to these initiatives as the three


(1)
"Developed Markets" include United States, Canada, western Europe and Australia.

(2)
"Emerging Markets" include central and eastern Europe, Latin America and the Asia Pacific region (excluding Australia).

(3)
"Adjacent Businesses" primarily include our data center and fine art storage businesses.

core pillars and maintain and strengthen our dividend.enabling activities. The Strategic Plan's growth and value pillars, as well as the enabling activities, are represented in the following graphic:

GRAPHICGRAPHIC


Table of Contents

        The table below highlights the significant 20152017 achievements with respect to each core growth and value pillar of our Strategic Plan:

Core Pillar
 Significant 20152017 Achievements

Profitable growth in Developed Markets

 

Continued Achieved strong internal storage revenue growth driven by revenue management and modest positive volume growth in storage rental revenue and volume growth across Developed Markets

Consolidated our executive leadership in North America and Western Europe to improve focus and alignment in our developed markets and present a single face to our major customers

Expansion and penetration in Emerging Markets

 


Expanded revenue from Emerging Markets based on annualized fourth quarter results to 14.6%more than 18% of total revenue in the fourth quarter of 2015,2017 (compared to 17.6% of total revenue in the fourth quarter of 2016), on a 2014 constant currency basis, demonstrating progress toward our goal to increase contribution from these markets to 20% by 2020

Deepened presence in existing emerging markets by achieving leadership position in India and expansion into eight new countries through completed acquisitions

Identifying, incubating and scaling Adjacent Businesses

 


Entered Developed our data center business from an Adjacent Business to a standalone reportable operating segment through investments, acquisitions and organic growth

Completed one acquisition in 2017 and announced two acquisitions, both of which closed in the fine art storage business by acquiring Crozier Fine Arts, a leading storage, logisticsfirst quarter of 2018, that, collectively, increase our footprint and transportation firm for high-value paintings, photographsprovide expansion potential

Completed first phase of new data center campus in Manassas, Virginia

Expanded entertainment services offering through acquisition of Bonded Services of America, Inc. and other types of art belonging to individual collectors, galleries and art museumsBonded Services Acquisition, Ltd., or, collectively, Bonded

Aligning Program Design with the Strategic Plan

        In connection with the continued execution of the Strategic Plan, theThe Compensation Committee periodically reviews our executive compensation programs to maintain the alignment of our incentives with our strategic objectives, including our Strategic Plan, and the creation of stockholder value. Our executive compensation programs include short-term and long-term incentive components.

        OurWe designed our short-term incentive program is designed to reward all of our executive officers for executing the Company's annual operating plan and demonstrating annual progress during the year toward the Company's achievement of multi-year strategic objectives. Results are measured on a constant currency


basis to remove the effects of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations and measure achievement primarily within the control of management. Our short-term incentive program consists of two general criteria for evaluation:

        In 2015,2017, the Compensation Committee approved adjustments to performance goal targets, or the Adjustment Factors, to (1) eliminate the effects of unbudgeted acquisitions and dispositions, (2) eliminate the effects of


rent reduction resulting from lease conversions, (3) eliminate the effects of expense reduction due to capitalized expenses and (3)(4) exclude the costs associated with our proposed acquisitionimpact of Recall from our Adjusted OIBDA calculation.spending on innovation initiatives. The Adjustment Factors apply to short-term performance-based compensation awarded in 20152017 and long-term PUs that isare subject to relevant goal targets.

        The net effect of applying the Adjustment Factors to the revenue targettargets increased the targetthose targets by 0.4%0.8%. The net effect of applying the Adjustment Factors increasedto Adjusted OIBDA performanceEBITDA and AFFO targets decreased the target for each metric by 5.0%, on average.0.5%.

Role of Named Executive Officers

        Our Named Executive Officers assist the Compensation Committee in carrying out its duties throughout the year by completing specific tasks, including:

Role of Consultants

        The Compensation Committee retains the services of an independent compensation consultant to provide ongoing advice and perspective to the Compensation Committee in the following areas related to the compensation of our Executive Officers:

        Since May 2012, the Compensation Committee has engaged Pay Governance LLC, or Pay Governance, to assist the Compensation Committee by providing ongoing executive compensation consulting. Pay Governance reports directly to the Compensation Committee, has regular meetings with


Table of Contents

the chairperson of the Compensation Committee and meets with the Compensation Committee in executive session.

        Pay Governance also provides assistance to the Nominating and Governance Committee on director compensation matters. In 2017, the Compensation Committee reviewed the nature of the relationship with its independent compensation consultants and determined that there were no conflicts that impacted the advice and guidance provided to the Compensation Committee.

Benchmarking

        To provide an external perspective relative to executive compensation levels, plan design trends and market best practices, the Compensation Committee reviews market analyses prepared by its independent compensation consultant. Given the nature of our business and our market leading position, there is no ideal group of companies that reflects direct business competitors or competitors for talent. Thetalent; consequently, the Compensation Committee has elected to develop a group of business services companies, or the Custom Peer Group, to serve as a reference point forGroup.

        The Compensation Committee annually reviews the market analyses.

Custom Peer Group. The Compensation Committee, in collaboration with our compensation consultant and management, annually reviews the Custom Peer Group for continued applicability and has developed the Custom Peer Group below based on the following criteria:

        The 20152017 Custom Peer Group includes the following companies, with an asterisk noting the newly added companies:

ABM Industries Clean Harbors IHSGlobal Payments
Alliance Data Systems Digital Realty Trust*Crown Castle International(1)(2) Paychex
American Tower(2) Dun & BradstreetEquifax Pitney Bowes
Brinks EquifaxEquinix(2) Prologis*Prologis(2)
Broadridge Financial FiservFidelity National Information Services(1) Quad/GraphicsStericycle(1)
Cintas Global PaymentsFiserv Western Union

(1)
This company was added to the custom peer group in 2017.

(2)
This company is a REIT.

        The median 2013 revenue ofin 2015, the most recent full year available when the 2017 Custom Peer Group was determined, was $3.4 billion for the 2017 Custom Peer Group compared to an estimated $3.8 billion for the Company's 2013 revenueCompany, adjusting for the annualized effect of $3.0 billion.acquisitions, including Recall. The 20152017 Custom Peer Group, as compared to the 20142016 Custom Peer Group, reflects (1) the removal of ADPDigital Realty Trust, Dun & Bradstreet and IHS Markit due to its largertheir smaller relative revenue size,figures, as well as IHS Markit now being listed in the United Kingdom and (2) the removal of Lender Processing Services due to its recent acquisition by Fidelity National Financial and (3) the addition of Digital Realty TrustCrown Castle International, Fidelity National Information Services and Prologis,Stericycle. Crown Castle is a specialized REIT and Fidelity National Information Services and Stericycle are business services companies, each of which is a REIT that metmeets the criteria described above.

How We Use Market Data

        Pay levels—Market data is one element considered by the Compensation Committee when making compensation decisions, but the Compensation Committee does not set compensation levels based solely on market data. Rather, the Compensation Committee reviews the 25th, 50th25th, 50th and 75th


Table of Contents

75th percentiles of relevant market data as one frame of reference in making its compensation decisions. Final compensation decisions reflect a variety of factors, including each executive's experience, performance rating, the relative importance of the executive's role within the organization, as well as where each executive's pay level falls relative to the market data.

        Plan design—When designing or assessing the design of our compensation programs, the Compensation Committee reviews programs of the Custom Peer Group to establish typical market practice. The Compensation Committee evaluates our specific circumstances and business objectives and follows market practice with respect to the design of our programs where appropriate but may deviate from market practice where the Compensation Committee deems it is in the best interest of the Company and ourits stockholders.

Components of 2017 Compensation

Role of ConsultantsOverview

        The Compensation Committee has retained the services of an independent compensation consultant to provide ongoing advice and perspective to the Compensation Committee in the following areas related to the compensation of our Named Executive Officers:

        Since May 2012, the Compensation Committee has engaged Pay Governance LLC, or Pay Governance, to assist the Compensation Committee by providing ongoing executive compensation consulting. Pay Governance reports directly to the Compensation Committee and has regular meetings with the chairperson of the Compensation Committee.

        Pay Governance does not provide any other services to the Company except providing assistance on director compensation matters for the Nominating and Governance Committee. The Compensation Committee has reviewed the nature of the relationship with its independent compensation consultants and determined that there were no conflicts that impacted the advice and guidance provided to the Compensation Committee.

Components of Compensation

        Our Named Executive Officers' total direct compensation, or TDC, for our Executive Officers is designed to reward our Named Executive Officersthem based on achievement of financial and strategic goals and returns to stockholders andstockholders. TDC consists of base salary, target bonus and long-term incentive grant value.


        As depicted below, approximately 87%89% of our CEO's target TDC, and, on average, 71%72% of the target TDC of our other Named Executive Officers' target TDCOfficers (where applicable, excluding the value of new hire inducement equity awards), is tied directly to the achievement of financial goals, strategic objectives or stock price appreciation through our short-term and long-term incentive programs.

CEO Other Named Executive Officers




GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

        Below is a summary of the elements, objectives, risk mitigation factors and key features of our TDC program for our Named Executive Officers. A more detailed discussion of each element and the associated pay decisions follows this section.


Table of Contents


        In addition to the TDC elements described above, our U.S.-based executives participate in the retirement and welfare benefits generally available to our full-timefull time employees, such as medical, dental, life insurance, 401(k) Plan, the 2013 ESPP, and other fringe benefits, some of which are more fully described below:

        In addition, our U.S.-based Named Executive Officers are eligible for certain executive benefits, including a voluntary deferred compensation program and limited perquisites, which are included in the "All Other Compensation" column ofand related footnote in the "Compensation Tables—Summary Compensation Table—Summary Compensation Table for 2015, 2016 and related footnote appearing in2017" section of this Proxy Statement.

        Also, our Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, or the EDCP, allows our Named Executive Officers to defer some of their base salary and/or cash incentive compensation in amounts in excess of the amounts they can defer under our 401(k) Plan. The Company does not provide contributions under the EDCP. The EDCP is intended to encourage the continued employment of the participating employees and to facilitate the recruiting of executive officers and other highly compensated employees required for our continued growth and profitability. Messrs. Day,Mr. Duale did not, and Mr. Keddy dodoes not, participate in the 401(k) Plan, the 2013 ESPP or the EDCP but eachbecause they are not U.S.-based executives. Instead, Mr. Duale received, and Mr. Keddy receives, additional benefits that are customary for executives in their respective work locations as more fully discussed under the "—"Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Components of Compensation—Employment Agreement with Mr. Day", "—Employment Agreement with Mr.Agreements—Marc Duale" and "—"Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Components of Compensation—Employment Agreement with Mr.Agreements—Patrick Keddy" sections of this Proxy Statement.


Table of Contents

Base Salary

        The table below details the annualized base salaries, and any year-over-yearyear over year increase, for each of our Named Executive Officers as measured at the end of each of 20142016 and 2015.2017. The increases were effective in March 2015, except that Mr. Keddy received a partial increase in March 2015 and a partial increase effective in April 2015, as further described below.2017. Consistent with typical market practice, in 20152017 our CEO received a higher base salary than the other Named Executive Officers. This is due primarily to the greater responsibility experience and oversight duties of the CEO as compared to the other Named Executive Officers.

Name
 2014 2015 Percent Change  2016 2017 Percent
Change
 

William L. Meaney

 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 None  $1,000,000 $1,000,000 0% 

Roderick Day(1)

 $458,610 $481,541 5.0% 

Marc A. Duale(2)

 $574,377 $574,377 None 

Deirdre Evens

 N/A $412,000 N/A 

Stuart Brown

 $550,000 $550,000 0% 

Fidelma Russo

 N/A $485,000 N/A 

Ernest Cloutier

 $475,000 $475,000 0% 

Patrick Keddy(3)(1)

 $409,698 $458,610 11.9%  $412,288 $438,056 6.3% 

Marc A. Duale(2)(3)

 $584,889 $584,889 0% 

Eileen Sweeney(4)

 $430,000 $430,000 0% 

(1)
Mr. Day'sKeddy's annual base salary was £300,000£320,000 at the end of 20142016 and £315,000£340,000 at the end of 2015, both of which2017. These salary figures have been converted to U.S. Dollars at a conversion rate of £1.00 to $1.5287,$1.2884, the average exchange rate for fiscal 2015.2017.

(2)
Mr. Duale's annual base salary was €517,830 at the end of 20142016 and 2015, which haveat his termination date in 2017. This salary figure has been converted to U.S. Dollars at a conversion rate of €1.00 to $1.1092,$1.1295, the average exchange rate for fiscal 2015.2017.


(3)
Mr. Keddy's base salary was £268,004 at the endDuale ceased to be one of 2014 and £300,000 at the endour Executive Officers on March 31, 2017.

(4)
Ms. Sweeney ceased to be one of 2015, both of which have been converted to U.S. Dollars at a conversion rate of £1.00 to $1.5287, the average exchange rate for fiscal 2015.our Executive Officers on October 5, 2017.

        The annual base salary increase provided to Mr. Day reflects his performancesalaries for Messrs. Meaney, Brown and development since his appointment as chief financial officer of the Company in March 2014Cloutier and his position relative to the relevant market benchmarks. The base salary increase for Mr. Keddy reflects a 3% merit increase effective March 2015 in his prior role and the remainder of the increase effective in April 2015 reflecting the additional responsibilities he assumed in his new role as EVP & GM, North America & Western Europe. Ms. Evens's base salary was set in connection with her appointment as EVP, Chief People Officer in July 2015 reflecting her experience, expected contributions and compensation with her previous employer as well as her position relative to the market benchmarks.

        The base salary of each of Mr. Meaney and Mr. DualeSweeney remained unchanged in 2015.from 2016 to 2017. The Compensation Committee determined that the base salary of Mr. Meaneyfor each Named Executive Officer was appropriately positioned based on the factors considered by the Compensation Committee and determined that any increase in TDC would be best delivered through our variable compensation programs. Mr. Duale's

        Ms. Russo's base salary is positioned abovewas set in connection with her appointment as Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer in March 2017, which was determined based on her experience, expected contributions and compensation with her previous employer, as well as her position relative to the 75th percentile of market data, largely due tobenchmarks.

        The base salary increase for Mr. Keddy reflects his depth of experienceperformance since his appointment in leading international businesses prior to joining the Company,April 2015 as EVP & GM, North America & Western Europe and reflects the compensation that was necessary to entice him to join the Company. Mr. Duale's salary has not been increased since 2009 in recognition of his position relative to both externalthe relevant market data and internal parity.benchmarks.

2017 Short-Term Performance-Based Incentive Compensation

Target Incentives

        Our Named Executive Officers participate in the Company's short-term performance-based incentive compensation programs. The Compensation Committee annually reviews the target short-term incentive opportunity for each Named Executive Officer and approves a new target, when appropriate.


Table of Contents

Short-term incentive compensation opportunities are expressed as a percentage of each Named Executive Officer's annual base salary. For 2015,2017, these percentages for our Named Executive Officers were:

Executive
 Short-Term Incentive Opportunity
Percentage of Salary
 

William L. Meaney

  135150%%

Roderick DayStuart Brown

  8085%%

Marc A. DualeFidelma Russo(1)

  8070%%

Deirdre Evens(1)Ernest Cloutier

  6085%%

Patrick Keddy

  7085%%

Marc A. Duale(2)

N/A

Eileen Sweeney(3)

60%

(1)
For 2015 only, asAs a result of her mid-yearMarch 2017 start date, Ms. Evens' 2015 bonus will reflectRusso's 2017 short-term incentive reflects 70% of her prorated base salary.

(2)
As a result of his separation from the Company in March 2017, Mr. Duale was not awarded a target short-term incentive for 2017 and did not receive a short-term incentive payment in 2016.

(3)
As a result of her separation from the Company in October 2017, Ms. Sweeney's 2017 short-term incentive reflects 60% of her proratedpro-rated base salary.

        The percentage of Mr. Meaney's 2015 total direct compensation attributable to2017 short-term incentive opportunity increased ten15 percentage points to 135%150% of base salary, reflectingsalary. This increase reflects an increase in Mr. Meaney's TDC as a result of the Compensation Committee'sBoard's evaluation of his performance relevantand an increase in the market benchmarksbenchmark.

        The percentage of Messrs. Cloutier's and Keddy's 2017 short-term incentive opportunity increased five percentage points to 85% of base salary. These increases reflect an increase in Messrs. Cloutier's and Keddy's TDC as a result of each executive's performance and Mr. Keddy's position relative to the external benchmarks.

        The increase in short-term incentive opportunity described above reflects the Compensation Committee's intentdesire to deliver total directstructure the majority of each executive's compensation increasesincrease through our variable compensation programs.

        The percentage of Mr. Keddy's 2015 total direct compensation attributable to short-term incentive opportunity increased ten percentage points to 70% of base salary, effective April 2015, in connection with his appointment as EVP & GM, North America & Western Europe.


        The percentage of Ms. Evens' 2015 total direct compensation attributable to short-term incentive opportunity was set at 60% of base salary in connection with her appointment as EVP, Chief People Officer in July 2015. In addition, Ms. Evens was provided a signing bonus of $200,000 as an inducement to join the Company in recognition of cash compensation that she forfeited when leaving her previous employer.

        The percentage of 20152017 salary attributable to short-term incentive opportunity for the other Named Executive Officers is, in each case, unchanged from 2014.2016. The Compensation Committee determined that each target opportunity represented the appropriate amount of short-term compensation at risk for each Named Executive Officer based on his or her role, impact on the Company's results and market comparisons. In 2015,2017, Mr. Meaney's target opportunity was the largest among theour Named Executive Officers because he was most accountable for the Company's performance, and the Compensation Committee determined it was important to provide a greater portion of his cash compensation through a variable program. The target short-term incentive compensation opportunity for other Named Executive Officers is a lower percentage of their base salary, reflecting their mix of compensation, expected impact on the performance of the Company and market practice for their role.roles.

Program Structure

        Achievement of the target short-term incentive opportunity for each Named Executive Officer is based upon (1) the Company's performance against targeta series of financial goals, (2) the Company's performance against a series of strategic objectives and (3) personal performance against the individual goals and objectives of the respective Named Executive Officer set at the beginning of the year, as illustrated below. All members of the senior executive team,Executive Officers, including theour Named Executive Officers, have the same target


Table of Contents

financial goals and the same financial and strategic objectives, which serve to align the senior executive teamour Executive Officers toward the same enterprise goals. The individual modifier component, however, allows for recognition of individual performance and contributions. In support of our philosophy of paying for performance, actual short-term incentive awards for our Named Executive Officers may range from 0% to a maximum of 167.5%, which can be reached when achieving maximum performance against all measures. of incentive opportunity. Where relevant, results are measured in constant currency to better reflect management's influence on results during the applicable year.

LOGOGRAPHIC


In addition, each executive'sExecutive Officer's short-term incentive bonus may be increased or decreased by as much as 25% of the target based on such executive's contribution to the measures above and performance against specific individual goals and objectives, including items such as the development and execution of business, organizational and marketing strategies with the objective to increase Adjusted EBITDA, revenue and Adjusted OIBDAAFFO and progress toward our multi-year strategic objectives.


Table of Contents

Financial PerformancePerformance—Adjusted EBITDA & Revenue

        Performance against financial targetsActual payout of our short-term incentive opportunity tied to Adjusted EBITDA and revenue in 20152017 was determined based on the matrix below, which is unchanged from 2014.similar to the matrix used in 2016. In developing the matrix, the Compensation Committee sought first to first ensure achievement of Adjusted OIBDA targetsEBITDA goals and then to reward overachievement when both Adjusted EBITDA and revenue and Adjusted OIBDA exceed target levels.exceeded goals. The Compensation Committee selected a maximum payout of 150% of target to be consistent with market practice but structured the matrix such that maximum payout was achieved only when revenueAdjusted EBITDA and Adjusted OIBDArevenue exceeded levels that the Compensation Committee considered exceptional performance basedperformance-based on the difficultyobjectives of the annual operating plan and recent Company performance.

 
 Revenue (% of target) 
Adjusted OIBDA (% of target)
 <99% 99% - 100% 100% - 101.5% 101.5% - 103% >103% 

95%

       ��4%      

96%

        23%      

97%

        42%      

98%

        62%      

99%

        81%      

100%

        100%      

101%

     105% 107.5% 110% 110%

102%

     110% 115% 115% 120%

103%

  100%    120% 125% 130%

104%

     115% 125% 135% 140%

105%

        130% 140% 150%
 
Revenue ($MM)
Adjusted EBITDA ($MM)
 
< $3,742 
$3,742 - $3,772 
$3,773 - $3,803 
$3,804 - $3,835 
>= $3,835 

$1,184.1

     15%     

$1,189.2

     23%     

$1,201.6

     42%     

$1,214.0

     62%     

$1,226.4

     81%     

$1,238.8

     100%     

$1,251.2

   105% 107.5% 110% 110% 

$1,263.6

   110% 115% 115% 120% 

$1,276.0

 100%   120% 125% 130% 

$1,288.4

   115% 125% 135% 140% 

$1,300.7

     130% 140% 150% 

        For 2015, the2017, our Named Executive Officers achieved 113%100.85% payout of the short-term incentive target bonus based on the performance results below:


 Target ($MM) Actual Result ($MM) Achievement  Actual Result ($MM) 

Adjusted OIBDA

 $916.3 $940.2 102.6%

Adjusted EBITDA

 $1,240.2 

Revenue

 $3,098.7 $3,077.8 99.3% $3,788.5 

Financial Performance—AFFO

        Actual payout of our short-term incentive opportunity tied to AFFO in 2017 was determined based on the payout scale below. In developing the payout scale, the Compensation Committee sought first to ensure achievement of AFFO targets and then to reward overachievement when AFFO exceeds target levels. The Compensation Committee selected the minimum threshold level required for payout of this component to ensure that AFFO was sufficient relative to the dividend and capital investment requirements in the annual budget. The Compensation Committee selected a maximum payout of 150% of target to be consistent with market practice but structured this component such that maximum payout was achieved only when AFFO exceeded levels that the Compensation Committee considered


Table of Contents

exceptional performance, based on the objectives of the annual operating plan and recent Company performance.

 
 Threshold Target Maximum Actual Results Payout 
 
 ($MM)
(50% Payout)

 ($MM)
 ($MM)
(150% Payout)

 ($MM)
  
 

AFFO

 $693.8 $730.3 $788.7 $739.4  107.8%

Strategic Objectives

        The table below describes the specific key measures established in 20152017 for each of the six strategic objectives on which the short-term incentive target bonus is based. The Compensation Committee weighted each strategic objective equally, and, for the purposes of determining payout, the Compensation Committee selected the key measures described in the table below as most representative of reflecting progress toward the achieving the objectives of our Strategic Plan. In establishing the payout opportunity for each of the goals, the Compensation Committee sought to set threshold performance levels for 20152017 that demonstrated meaningful progress toward the multi-year goals established by the Strategic Plan. The Compensation Committee provided increasing rewards as performance approached the maximum level to recognize overachievement relative to expected progress during the year.

Strategic Objective
 Key Measures

Profitable growth in Developed Markets

 

Internal growth of storage rental revenue (excluding the effects of acquisitions) for Developed Markets

Revenue growth in Emerging Markets

 

42017 annualized revenue run rateth(1) quarter revenue as a percentage of total revenue run rate

Identifying, incubating and scaling Adjacent Businesses

 

Annualized2017 annualized revenue run rate at end of year(6)(measured on an organic basis)

Leveraging real estateRecall integration and Transformation Initiative

 

Real estate ownership as a percentage of total real estate

Talent developmentrun rate savings(2) achieved through Recall integration and Transformation Initiative

Implement development plans for key organizational roles

Expand formal talent evaluation deeper into the organization

Implement rotational process for development of key executives across function or geography

Safety and security

 

Implement globalGlobal accident and lost time injury reporting process

 

Implement improvement plan related to security and fire protection Multi-year strategic roadmap development

 

Implement securityTotal recordable incident rate(3) in select countries

Innovation

Concept and fire prevention policies and testing of product ideas

Successful product launch


(6)(1)
Annualized revenue run rate at end offor a given year is the product of December(i) that year's fourth quarter revenue multiplied by 12.(ii) four.

(2)
Run rate savings reflect the annualized savings for actions implemented during 2017.

(3)
Total recordable incident rate represents the number of incidents per 100 full-time equivalent employees.

Table of Contents

        Overall, the Company achieved 94.17%92.5% of the specific strategic objectives target for 20152017 based on the strategic objective results below:

Strategic Objective
 Measure Goals
(payout percentage in
parentheses)
 Results Payout %  Measure Goals
(payout percentage in
parentheses)
 Results Payout
%(1)
 

Profitable growth in Developed Markets

 Internal growth of storage revenue for Developed Markets Threshold (75%): 1.3% Target (100%): 1.5% Maximum (125%): 1.8% 1.2% 0% Internal growth of storage revenue for Developed Markets Threshold (75%): 1.2% Target (100%): 1.5% Maximum (125%): 1.8% 3.0% 125%

Revenue growth in Emerging Markets

 

4th quarter revenue as a percentage of total revenue for Emerging Markets

 

Threshold (50%): 12.4% Target (100%): 12.9% Maximum (125%): 13.7%

 

12.9%

 
100

%
 

Annualized revenue run rate as a percentage of total revenue for Emerging Markets

 

Threshold (50%): 15.1% Target (100%): 15.6% Maximum (125%): 16.1%

 

15.9%

 
115

%

Development of a robust Adjacent Businesses pipeline

 

Annualized revenue as of the end of fiscal 2015 from Adjacent Businesses

 

Threshold (50%): $30,000,000 Target (100%)—$50,000,000 Maximum (125%)—$60,000,000

 

$56,000,000

 
115

%

Leveraging real estate

 

Real estate ownership as a percentage of total real estate

 

Threshold (50%): 35.2% Target (100%): 35.7% Maximum (125%): 36.2%

 

36.6%

 
125

%

Talent development

 

Implement developments plans for key organizational roles

Expand formal talent evaluation deeper into the organization

Implement rotational process to for development of key executives across function or geography

 
Target payout reflects achievement of:


implementation of development plans for key organizational roles

expansion of formal talent evaluation for director level and above

identification and implementation of four rotational opportunities

Above target payout requires:

identification and implementation of at least six rotational opportunities

acceleration of the development plan process for the next level of executives from 2016 into 2015

 

The Committee determined that target payout had been achieved based on completion of the stated target objectives coupled with a subjective evaluation of the success of the rotations implemented during the year

 
100

%

Identifying, incubating and scaling Adjacent Businesses

 

Annualized organic revenue run rate from Adjacent Businesses

 

Threshold/Target (100%): $65,000,000 Maximum (125%): $75,000,000

 

$63,600,000

 
0

%

Recall integration and Transformation Initiative

 

Run rate savings

 

Threshold (50%): $50,000,000 Target (100%): $55,000,000 Maximum (125%): $60,000,000

 

$54,000,000(2)

 
90

%

Safety and security

 

Implement global accident and lost time injury reporting process

Improvement plan related to security and fire protection

Security and fire prevention policies and testing

 
Target payout requires:


implementation of consistent reporting globally by October 1, 2015

completion of the 2015 enterprise improvement plan for access control, closed-circuit TV, and fire detection and suppression

Above target payout requires that 100% of our 1050+ facilities globally (excluding buildings acquired after October 1, 2015) meet our requirements for a written emergency action plan, written fire protection plan and conduct annual fire drills.

 

All goals were completed during 2015 resulting in maximum payout

 
125

%
 

Implement global accident and lost time injury reporting system

Develop and begin implementation of multi-year safety roadmap

Improve Total Recordable Incident Rate in select countries

 
Target payout (100%) requires:


Transition reporting process to a systems based approach

Develop and begin implementation of multi-year strategic safety roadmap

Total Recordable Incident Rate target in North America and United Kingdom

Maximum payout (125%) could be achieved for meeting target and making further improvement in Total Recordable Incident Rate for five additional countries

 

Maximum achievement was achieved, yet negative discretion was applied due to due to the failure to achieve certain other safety objectives

 
100

%

Innovation

 

Product testing and launch

 

Threshold (50%): develop two product concepts, each with the opportunity to generate $10 million in annual revenue in the third year following product launch, or a Qualified Idea, and progress two Qualified Ideas through concept and testing phases

 

Achieved maximum result

 
125

%

 

Target (100%): achieve threshold plus the launch of a product with a defined annual revenue commitment exceeding $5 million in the Company's 2018 annual budget

   

 

Maximum (125%): achieve threshold plus the launch of a product with a defined annual revenue commitment exceeding $10 million in the Company's 2018 annual budget

   

Individual Modifier

        Individual goals and objectives were aimed at focusing


(1)
The Compensation Committee selected a maximum payout of 125% for each Named Executive Officer's attention in areas where he hasmetric reflecting the most potential for impacting the Company's performance, and we believe each Named Executive Officer's targets were reasonably attainable if he performed to his potential.

        Eachlonger term nature of the Named Executive Officers exceeded his 2015 individual goals and objectives and the lesser direct impact on 2017 financial performance.

(2)
Reflects a discretionary adjustment of $4,000,000 approved by the Compensation Committee approved a specific individual modifier for each Named Executive Officer.

in February 2018 related to the exclusion of one initiative that had been initially included in the target. The Compensation Committee determined that an adjustment was appropriate in the context of the overall goals of the Company. The net impact of this adjustment was to increase the total bonus payout by 2%.

The table below includes the key factors considered in evaluating the achievementTable of each Named Executive Officer's individual goals and objectives:

NEO
Key AchievementsIndividual
Modifier
William L. Meaney

Contents

Achieved strong financial results with total revenues for 2015 growing year-over-year by 2.1%, and Adjusted OIBDA for 2015 growing year-over-year by 5.1% excluding restructuring charges, both measured in constant currency.

Drove improved operating performance, which included 2.7% year-over-year growth in internal storage rental revenues (before the benefit from acquisitions); net positive year-over-year cubic volume growth; reduced the erosion in service margin; and delivering $50M of year-end run rate savings through phase 1 Transformation efforts.

Continued to deliver on multi-year strategic plan with revenue from Emerging Markets accounting for 14.6% of total revenues in Q4 2015 and Adjacent Business ended 2015 with run-rate revenue of 1.7% of total revenues, measured in constant currency.

Drove improvements in safety throughout the enterprise by implementing a globally consistent reporting system for tracking accidents and lost time; completed life-safety goals, with every facility conducting a fire drill and updating their fire-prevention and emergency action plans.

With the announcement and pending acquisition of Recall Holdings, negotiated a highly accretive deal, managed investor communication, and established a strong path for integration in 2016.

+20%

Roderick Day


Led development and delivery of the Company's multi-year three financial plan addressing strong long term earnings growth, dividend coverage, leverage, and optimal funding.

Partnered to lead development and delivery of investor day presentation, plans, and meetings with investors.

Enhanced strategic real estate function through onboarding a real estate investment leader, developing real estate strategy and contributed to success against real estate Strategic Objective.

Led cost management, capital allocation, and supported key strategic initiatives that contributed to positive Adjusted OIBDA results.


+5

%

NEO
Key AchievementsIndividual
Modifier

Marc A. Duale

Led the Other International business unit's strong contribution toward 2015, revenue and Adjusted OIBDA results.

Developed strategy approved internally by our executive officer for expansion into new regions.

Enhanced safety focus through operational risk committees and reinforcing safety focus throughout the Other International business unit.

+20%

Deirdre Evens


Joined Iron Mountain in July 2015 and successfully integrated into her role, quickly establishing credibility and impact with the human resources organization, our employees, the senior executive team and the Board of Directors. Represented the company as a presenter at our annual investor day

Led integration planning with respect to organization design, talent selection, and operating model, and associated synergy goals with respect to our pending acquisition of Recall Holdings.

Achieved transformation targets for 2015 and plans for 2016, while developing an organizational and service delivery model aligned with strategic plan.

Led Executive Talent Assessment and Succession process for CEO and Board of Directors.


+10

%

Patrick Keddy


Assumed expanded role leading Developed Markets early in 2015.

Developed strategy and plan to lead Developed Markets toward a 3+% annual growth through 2018.

Improved capital efficiency in Western Europe and established procedures to drive improvement in North America.

Led significant change management in safety programs across Developed Markets resulting in a 6% improvement in total recordable incident rate.

Drove initiatives and plan that has resulted in stabilization of service margin in Q4, with expected additional improvements in 2016.


+5

%

        Based on our 20152017 achievement relative to established financial goals and strategic objectives, and individual goals and objectives, our Named Executive Officers earned 119.35% of targetthe preliminary short-term incentive opportunity, on average. The following table sets forth certain information relatingpayout, prior to the payoutsapplication of short-term cash incentive compensation toindividual modifiers, equals 100.4% as outlined in the Named Executive Officers during the year ended December 31, 2015.table below.



Payouts of Short-Term Incentive Compensation

 
  
  
 2015 Target
Opportunity
  
 2015 End-of-Year Performance and Payout 
 
  
 2015
Eligible
Earnings
($)
  
 
 
  
  
  
 Target
Weighting
(%)
 Target
Opportunity
($)
 Payout
Achievement
(%)(1)
 Payout
($)
 
Named Executive
Officer
  
 (%) ($)  
 Measure & Scope 

William L. Meaney

   $1,000,000  135.0%$1,350,000 (a) Financial Performance  70.00%$945,000  113.0%$1,067,850 

            (b) Strategy Objectives  30.00%$405,000  94.2%$381,375 

            (c) Individual Modifier        +20%$270,000 

              Total 2015 Payout          $1,719,225 

Roderick Day

   
$

476,515
  
80.0

%

$

381,212
 

(a)

 

Financial Performance

  
70.00

%

$

266,848
  
113.0

%

$

301,538
 

            (b) Strategy Objectives  30.00%$114,364  94.2%$107,692 

            (c) Individual Modifier        +5%$19,061 

              Total 2015 Payout          $428,291 

Marc A. Duale

   
$

574,377
  
80.0

%

$

459,502
 

(a)

 

Financial Performance

  
70.00

%

$

321,651
  
113.0

%

$

363,466
 

            (b) Strategy Objectives  30.00%$137,851  94.2%$129,809 

            (c) Individual Modifier        +20%$91,900 

              Total 2015 Payout          $585,175 

Deirdre Evens

   
$

185,118
  
60.0

%

$

111,071
 

(a)

 

Financial Performance

  
70.00

%

$

77,750
  
113.0

%

$

87,857
 

            (b) Strategy Objectives  30.00%$33,321  94.2%$31,377 

            (c) Individual Modifier        +10%$11,107 

              Total 2015 Payout          $130,341 

Patrick Keddy

   
$

447,493
  
67.7

%

$

302,923
 

(a)

 

Financial Performance

  
70.00

%

$

212,046
  
113.0

%

$

239,612
 

            (b) Strategy Objectives  30.00%$90,877  94.2%$85,576 

            (c) Individual Modifier        +5%$15,146 

              Total 2015 Payout          $340,334 
Measure & Scope
 Target
Weighting
(%)
 Payout
Achievement(1)
(%)
 

Adj EBITDA & Revenue

  40.00% 100.9%

AFFO

  30.00% 107.8%

Strategic Objectives

  30.00% 92.5%

Preliminary weighted payout

     100.4%

(1)
Payout achievement represents the percentage of the target payout earned based on the level of the Company's achievement of performance measures, and individual modifiers, as disclosed above.

2017 Individual Modifiers

        Individual goals and objectives were aimed at focusing each Named Executive Officer's attention in areas where he or she has the most potential for impacting the Company's performance, and we believe each Named Executive Officer's targets were reasonably attainable if he or she performed to his or her potential.

        Each of our Named Executive Officers exceeded his or her 2017 individual goals and objectives, and the Compensation Committee approved a specific individual modifier for each Named Executive Officer. The table below includes the key factors considered in evaluating the achievement of each Named Executive Officer's individual goals and objectives:

Named Executive Officer
Key AchievementsIndividual
Modifier
William L. Meaney

Achieved strong financial results for 2017, delivering internal revenue and volume growth within our core business

+20%

Expanded our data center business through the completion of one acquisition and the signing of one acquisition that closed in January 2018, which significantly increases data center presence in the United States

Continued development of our innovation capabilities, including the launch of Iron Cloud in 2017 representing a new product offering in a rapidly growing market segment

Continued to scale our Adjacent Businesses through the completion of the Bonded acquisition and pilots in consumer-related businesses


Table of Contents

Named Executive Officer
Key AchievementsIndividual
Modifier

Stuart Brown


Completed equity offering in connection with financing of acquisition of IO Data Centers, LLC that helped facilitate signing of the acquisition agreement in 2017

Completed debt restructuring initiatives that reduced interest expense and extended the maturity period of our long-term debt

Achieved transformation savings targets through process efficiency while improving the speed and quality of the internal forecasting and planning processes

Successfully attracted additional institutional REIT investors and added additional sell-side analysts

+10%

Fidelma Russo


Successfully integrated into her role as Executive Vice President, Chief Technology Officer

Evaluated existing IT infrastructure and identified areas where alternative or new technology can enhance internal performance

Implemented internal organization structure focused on IT and client-facing applications to leverage technology with our customers


+10

%


Initiated process of evaluating ways to use technology to enhance client experience with internal approval to explore a technology enabled approach in our core business

Ernest Cloutier


Assumed the role of EVP & GM, International in April 2017

Delivered strong results in Emerging Markets, contributing toward our 2017 revenue and Adjusted EBITDA results

Continued execution of M&A strategy by completing 11 acquisitions and building a robust M&A pipeline to continue growth

Achieved Recall integration targets for 2017


+15

%

Patrick Keddy


Led Developed Markets contribution towards 2017 revenue and adjusted EBITDA

Delivered strong internal storage revenue growth reflecting execution of revenue management initiatives

Achieved Recall integration and Transformation Initiative targets for 2017

Implemented new sales and marketing structures to support revenue growth


+20

%

Table of Contents

Payouts of Short-Term Incentive Compensation

        After applying applicable individual modifiers, our Named Executive Officers earned 115% of target short-term incentive opportunity, on average. The following table sets forth certain information relating to the payouts of short-term cash incentive compensation to our Named Executive Officers during the year ended December 31, 2017.

 
  
 2017 Target
Opportunity
 2017 End-of-Year Performance and Payout 
 
 2017
Eligible
Earnings
($)
 
 
 Preliminary
STI Payout
(% of target)
 Individual
Modifier
(%)
 Final
STI Payout
(% of target)
 Payout
($)
 
Named Executive Officer
 (%) ($) 

William L. Meaney

 $1,000,000  150.0%$1,500,000  100.4% +20% 120.4%$1,806,000 

Stuart Brown

 $550,000  85.0%$467,500  100.4% +10% 110.4%$516,120 

Fidelma Russo

 $390,658  70.0%$273,461  100.4% +10% 110.4%$301,900 

Ernest Cloutier

 $475,000  85.0%$403,750  100.4% +15% 115.4%$465,928 

Patrick Keddy

 $433,891  85.0%$368,807  100.4% +20% 120.4%$444,044 

*
Ms. Sweeney received a prorated portion of her short-term incentive compensation as part of the Sweeney Separation Agreement (as defined herein) which is detailed in the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Components of Compensation—Severance Policy—Sweeney Separation Agreement" section of this Proxy Statement. Mr. Duale was not eligible for short-term incentive compensation in 2017.

Long-Term Equity Compensation

LTI Program Design

        In February 2014, the Compensation Committee approved a long-term incentiveLTI program to reward the achievement of the growth objectives in conjunction with the Strategic Plan. In 2017, the Compensation Committee modified the LTI program with respect to our CEO to establish a long-term equity compensation mix that is aligned with market practice and consistent with our EVPs. The modifications:


Table of Contents

        The 2017 long-term incentive program includes a portfolio of vehicles described below:in the table below.

Long-Term Incentive
Component
 Description Purpose
TSR-Based PUs 

the value of the TSR-Based PUs is tiedcorrelated to total stockholder return relative to the S&P 500 (excluding financial services companies)MSCI US REIT Index over three yearsa three-year period following the date of grant

 

rewards TSR performance relative to a broadkey REIT stock market measureindex

3-year goals ensure longer-term focus

PUs (Storage
Revenue/ROIC)
 

the value of PUs is tiedcorrelated to certain storage revenue growth objectives, subject to meeting a minimum level of ROIC, both determined basedas measured on full year 2017 resultsa three-year period following the date of grant, without regard to currency fluctuation

 

rewards achievement of internal growth objectives with responsible capital allocation

3-year goalsresults measured as of the end of the three-year performance period to ensure longer-term focus

Stock Options 

stock options have an exercise price equal to fair value on the date of grant

 

rewards price appreciation

  

stock options vest ratably over three years and have a 10-year term

 

provides long-term horizon to minimize possible short-term fluctuations

Premium Priced
Stock Options

premium stock options have an exercise price equal to 125% of fair value on the date of grant

further enhances the performance-based nature of stock options

premium stock options vest ratably over three years and generally have a 10-year term

provides long-term horizon to minimize possible short-term fluctuations

RSUs 

RSUs vest ratably over three years

 

provides retention as well as alignment with stockholders

        Our long-term incentive program provides a mix of long-term incentive components for our executive officers, including theour Named Executive Officers, which ensures a majority of the long-term incentive opportunity is performance-based; however, the Compensation Committee elected to retain RSU awards as a component of theperformance-based. Our long-term incentive program to help ensure the retentionprogram's mix of key executives.incentive components for 2017 was:

 
 % of Economic Grant
Value
 
Long-Term Incentive Vehicle
 CEO EVP SVP 

TSR-Based PUs

  20%  25%  15% 

PUs (Revenue/ROIC)

  20%  25%  15% 

Stock Options

  30%  20%  20% 

RSUs

  30%  30%  50% 

        A majority of Mr. Meaney's long-term incentives are performance-based. His mix of components containsvehicles reflects the highest percentagefirst year of RSUs becausea transition to align his compensation with our EVPs. The transition is described in the performance-based awards received by him have a higher risk profile than other executives due to the inclusion"Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2018 Updates" section of premium priced stock options. Thethis Proxy Statement.


Compensation Committee provided premium priced stock options to provide an enhanced performance focus relative to standard stock options due to the higher exercise price of the premium priced stock options.

 
 % of Economic
Grant Value
 
Long-Term Incentive Vehicle
 CEO EVP 

PUs (TSR)

  15% 25%

PUs (Revenue/ROIC)

  15% 25%

Premium Priced Stock Options

  30% N/A 

Stock Options

  N/A  20%

RSUs

  40% 30%

20152017 Long-Term Incentive Awards

        The Compensation Committee considers equity grants for our Named Executive Officers in the first quarter of each year. The Compensation Committee makes determinations about the amount and the type of equity incentives to award to each Named Executive Officer based on a number of factors, including:


Table of Contents

    amount and terms of equity incentives granted in the market benchmark data;

    amount and type of equity incentives previously granted to such Named Executive Officer;

    value of and the complexity of the duties performed by such Named Executive Officer now and as anticipated in the future;

    such Named Executive Officer's performance rating as determined by our internal performance review process; and

    the total and average grant values for members of the Namedsuch Executive Officers'Officer's internal peer group.

        For 2015,2017, the Compensation Committee approved a potential economic value for long-term equity grants for each of our Executive Officers. For each of our Named Executive Officers. In each caseOfficers (other than with respect to Mr. Duale)Meaney and Ms. Russo), the value approved by the Compensation Committee for 20152017 was generally larger thancomparable with the corresponding value approved in 2014, reflecting2016. The increase of the following considerations:potential economic value for Mr. Meaney is detailed above in "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2017 Compensation Decisions and Performance—Pay Opportunity." Ms. Russo joined the Company in 2017; therefore, there is no comparable 2016 data.

    Mr. Meaney's long-term equity grants in 20152017 had a value of $5,150,000$6,750,000 (an increase of $1,150,000$1,250,000 as compared to 2014)2016), reflecting the Compensation Committee's evaluationBoard's assessment of hisMr. Meaney's performance, increases in relevant market benchmarks due primarily to the increased size of the Company following the acquisition of Recall, and the objective to deliver the majority of Mr. Meaney's compensation through long-term incentive opportunities. The value of Mr. Meaney's long-term equity grant in 20152017 was larger compared to our other Named Executive Officers in order to place a greater portion of his compensation on the long-term success of the Company and further alignstrengthen the alignment of his interests with our stockholders.

    Mr. Day's long-term equity grants in 2015 had a value of $1,250,000 (an increase of $250,000 as compared to 2014), reflecting his performance since his appointment as CFO and a reassessment of relevant market benchmarks.

    Mr. Keddy's received two separate long-term equity grants in 2015 with an aggregate value of $750,000 (an increase of $550,000 as compared to 2014). Mr. Keddy received a long-term incentive award in February with a potential economic value of $200,000 in his role as SVP, Western Europe, or the February Award. The February Award consisted of a vehicle mix consistent with our other SVPs. In connection with his appointment as EVP & GM, North America & Western Europe, Mr. Keddy received an additional long-term incentive award in May with a potential economic value of $550,000, or the May Award, which, when combined with the February Award, the Compensation Committee

      determined was appropriate for his role. The May Award consisted of the EVP vehicle mix described above.

    In connection with Ms. Evens'sRusso's appointment as EVP,Executive Vice President, Chief PeopleTechnology Officer in July 2015,March 2017, the Compensation Committee approved a long-term incentive award in the amount of $600,000,$700,000, which is generallythe Compensation Committee structured consistent with long-term equity grants received by other executives similarly situated within the Company.EVPs. In addition, the Compensation Committee approved an equity award of $750,000$900,000 for Ms. EvensRusso as an inducement to join the Company as well as an additional $200,000 which was approved in recognition of the value of equity she was forfeiting atFebruary 2018. Ms. Russo's 2017 awards were approved in February with a grant date equal to her previous employer.
hire date in March.

        The table below outlines the potential economic value of the long-term equity incentive awards approved in 20152017 by the Compensation Committee for each Named Executive Officer:Officer, except for Mr. Duale, who did not receive long-term incentive awards following his resignation from as the Company's President, International in 2017:

Name
 Target PUs(1)
(TSR)
 Target PUs
(Revenue/ROIC)
 Premium Priced
Stock Options
 Stock
Options
 RSUs Total  Target TSR-
Based PUs(1)
 Target PUs
(Revenue/ROIC)
 Stock
Options
 RSUs Total 

William L. Meaney

 $772,500 $772,500 $1,545,000 N/A $2,060,000 $5,150,000  $1,350,000 $1,350,000 $2,025,000 $2,025,000 $6,750,000 

Roderick Day

 $312,500 $312,500 N/A $250,000 $375,000 $1,250,000 

Marc A. Duale

 $187,500 $187,500 N/A $150,000 $225,000 $750,000 

Deirdre Evens

 $150,000 $150,000 N/A $120,000 $930,000 $1,350,000 

Stuart Brown

 $300,000 $300,000 $240,000 $360,000 $1,200,000 

Fidelma Russo

 $175,000 $175,000 $140,000 $1,110,000 $1,600,000 

Ernest Cloutier

 $187,500 $187,500 $150,000 $225,000 $750,000 

Patrick Keddy

 $167,500 $167,500 N/A $150,000 $265,000 $750,000  $200,000 $200,000 $160,000 $240,000 $800,000 

Eileen Sweeney(2)

 $75,000 $75,000 $100,000 $250,000 $500,000 

(1)
For the TSR-Based PUs, the fair value reflects a Monte Carlo simulation due to the nature of the award. As a result, the grant date fair values reported in the "Grants of Plan-BasedPlan Based Awards" table differ from the values shown in the columns above.

Table of Contents

(2)
Ms. Sweeney's long-term equity awards were modified pursuant to the Sweeney Separation Agreement, as further described in the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Components of Compensation—Severance Policy—Sweeney Separation Agreement" section in this Proxy Statement.

Performance Units—Total Stockholder Return

        In 2015 all of our2017, the following Named Executive Officers including Mr. Meaney, received an award of PUs that can be earned based on the Company's TSR during the three-year period beginning in 20152017 and measured relative to the S&P 500 (excluding financial services companies).MSCI US REIT Index. The number of TSR-Based PUs earned will be determined based on the table below and will vest on the third anniversary of the grant. The TSR-Based PUs will settle in shares of Common Stock when they vest. In addition, the TSR-Based PUs accrue dividend equivalents in cash, or, in the case of stock dividends, additional TSR-Based PUs. The dividend equivalents are payable when TSR-Based PUs vest and reflect only dividend equivalents attributable to shares earned.

TSR Percentile Rank(1)
 % of Target 

30th Percentile

  50%

50th Percentile

  100%

75th Percentile

  150%(2)

90th Percentile

  200%(2)

(1)
Results will be interpolated between percentiles

(2)
If the Company's absolute TSR is negative, the payout percentage will not exceed 100%

        The number of PU awards granted in 2015 is set forth below, but the actual number of earned PUs will be determined following the completion of the performance period and will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date.

below:

Named Executive Officer
 Target PUs
Granted
 

William L. Meaney

  19,89436,486 

Roderick DayStuart Brown

  8,0478,108 

Marc A. DualeFidelma Russo

  4,8285,145 

Deirdre EvensErnest Cloutier

  4,7835,067 

Patrick Keddy

  4,4975,405

Eileen Sweeney(1)

2,027 

(1)
Ms. Sweeney forfeited approximately 67% of this award following her separation in October 2017. Approximately 33% of this award vested in accordance with the Sweeney Separation Agreement.

2013        The number of TSR-Based PUs

        In 2013, Mr. Meaney was granted TSR-Based PU awards that could earned will be earneddetermined at the end of the three-year performance period, based on the table below, by comparing the Company's TSR during the three-yearfor that period from 2013 through 2015 measured relative to the S&P 500 (excluding financial services companies)TSR of the companies in the MSCI US REIT Index over the same period. The number ofearned TSR-Based PUs that could be earned was consistent withvest on the performance schedule included above.

        Following the completionthird anniversary of the performance period,grant date and will settle in shares of Common Stock. TSR-Based PUs accrue dividend equivalents in cash, or, in the Compensation Committee determined that no awards had been earned undercase of stock dividends, additional TSR-Based PUs, and the performance schedule. The Company's TSR was 13% during the period which represented the 24th percentiledividend equivalents are payable when TSR-Based PUs vest and reflect only dividend equivalents attributable to shares earned.

TSR Percentile Rank(1)
% of Target

30th Percentile

50%

50th Percentile

100%

75th Percentile

150%(2)

90th Percentile

200%(2)

(1)
Results are interpolated between percentiles

(2)
Regardless of the peer group, belowTSR percentile rank, if the threshold levelCompany's absolute TSR is negative, the payout percentage will not exceed 100%

Table of performance required to earn any awards.Contents

Performance Units—Storage Revenue & ROIC

        In 2015 all of our2017, the following Named Executive Officers including Mr. Meaney, received an award of PUs that arethe payout for which is based on the Company's performance against multi-year enterprise storage revenue growth and ROIC measures. The range of payout is 0%-200% of the number of PU awards granted PU awards.in 2017 is set forth below:

Named Executive Officer
Target PUs
Granted

William L. Meaney

36,486

Stuart Brown

8,108

Fidelma Russo

5,145

Ernest Cloutier

5,067

Patrick Keddy

5,405

Eileen Sweeney(1)

2,027

(1)
Ms. Sweeney forfeited approximately 67% of this award following her separation in October 2017. Approximately 33% of this award vested in accordance with the Sweeney Separation Agreement.

        The number of PUs actually earned will be determined at the end of the three-year performance period by measuring the Company's actual 20172019 financial performance, the third year of the performance period, against the target performance.targets set at the beginning of the performance period, based on the table below. The earned PUs vest on the third anniversary of the grant date and will settle in shares of Common Stock when they vest. In addition, theStock. PUs accrue dividend equivalents in cash, or, in the case of stock dividends, additional PUs, and the dividend equivalents are payable when PUs vest and reflect only dividend equivalents attributable to shares earned.

Actual Performance as
a % of Target
 
Payout as
a % of Target(1)
95% 25%
100% 100%
110% 200%

(1)
Results are interpolated between performance levels above.

        Determination of the percentage achievement of PU awards relative to the 2017 enterprise storage revenue target will be made according to the table below.        Payout in accordance with the table will only be made if 20172019 ROIC exceeds the minimum amount set by the Compensation Committee:Committee.

Actual Performance as
a % of Target
 
Payout as
a % of Target(1)
95% 25%
100% 100%
110% 200%

(1)
Results will be interpolated between performance levels above

Restricted Stock Units

        The number of PU awards granted in 2015 is set forth below, but the actual number of earned PUs will be determined following the completion of the 2017 fiscal year and will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date.

Named Executive Officer
Target PUs
Granted

William L. Meaney

19,894

Roderick Day

8,047

Marc A. Duale

4,828

Deirdre Evens

4,783

Patrick Keddy

4,497

Restricted Stock Units

        All of our Named Executive Officers including Mr. Meaney, received an award of RSUs in 2015.2017. The number of RSUs granted to each Named Executive Officer was determined by dividing the total value of the award approved by the Compensation Committee by the closing price of our Common Stock on the date of grant, or the Fair Market Value. RSUs generally vest in three substantially equal, annual installments beginning on the first anniversary date of the grant. The RSUs accrue dividend equivalents in cash, or, in the case of stock dividends, additional RSUs. The dividend equivalents are payable when RSUs vest.


Table of Contents

        The table below sets forth the RSUs granted in 2015:

2017:

Named Executive Officer
 RSUs Granted 

William L. Meaney

  53,05154,729 

Roderick DayStuart Brown

  9,6579,729 

Marc A. DualeFidelma Russo

  5,79432,636 

Deirdre EvensErnest Cloutier

  29,6546,081 

Patrick Keddy

  7,0456,486

Eileen Sweeney(1)

6,756 

(1)
Ms. Sweeney forfeited approximately 67% of this award following her separation in October 2017. Approximately 33% of this award vested in accordance with the Sweeney Separation Agreement.

Premium Priced Stock Options

        Mr. Meaney wasThe following Named Executive Officers were awarded 349,247 premium priced stock options in 2015.2017. The number of stock options awarded to each Named Executive Officer was determined based on the total value of the award approved by the Compensation Committee divided by the estimated Black-ScholesBlack Scholes value of such award on the date of grant. The stock options were granted at an exercise price equal to 125% of the Fair Market Value on the date of grant. The premium priced stock options vest in three substantially equal, annual installments beginning on the first anniversary date of the grant.

Stock Options

        All of our Named Executive Officers were awarded stock options in 2015 (except for our CEO, who received premium priced stock options as described above). The number of stock options awarded to each Named Executive Officer (other than our CEO) was determined based on the total value of the award approved by the Compensation Committee divided by the estimated Black-Scholes value of such award the date of grant. The stock options were granted at an exercise price equal to the Fair


Market Value. The stock options vest in three substantially equal, annual installments beginning on the first anniversary date of the grant. The table below details the stock options granted in 2015:

2017:

Named Executive Officer
 Stock
Options
Granted
 

Roderick DayWilliam L. Meaney

  44,581461,696 

Marc A. DualeStuart Brown

  26,74954,719 

Deirdre EvensFidelma Russo

  32,08736,910

Ernest Cloutier

34,199 

Patrick Keddy

  29,23536,479

Eileen Sweeney(1)

22,799 

(1)
Ms. Sweeney forfeited approximately 67% of this award following her separation in October 2017. Approximately 33% of this award vested in accordance with the Sweeney Separation Agreement.

2017 Vesting of Previously Granted PUs

Vesting of 2015 TSR-Based PUs

        In 2015, certain of our Named Executive Officers, including Mr. Meaney, were granted TSR-Based PU awards that could be earned based on the Company's TSR during the three-year period from 2015 through 2017 measured relative to the S&P 500 (excluding financial services companies) over the same period. The number of PUs that could be earned was based on the schedule below:

TSR Percentile Rank(1)
% of Target

30th Percentile

50%

50th Percentile

100%

75th Percentile

150%(2)

90th Percentile

200%(2)

(1)
Results are interpolated between percentiles

(2)
Regardless of the TSR percentile rank, if the Company's absolute TSR is negative, the payout percentage will not exceed 100%

Table of Contents

        Following the completion of the performance period, the Compensation Committee determined that award recipients had earned 78.5% of target for the 2015 TSR-Based PUs based on the Company's cumulative TSR of 20% during the period, which represented the 41st percentile of the S&P 500 (excluding financial services companies). The table below details the target shares and the share earned:

Named Executive Officer
 Target PUs Earned PUs 

William L. Meaney

  19,894  15,616 

Stuart Brown

  N/A  N/A 

Fidelma Russo

  N/A  N/A 

Ernest Cloutier

  4,506  3,537 

Patrick Keddy

  4,497  3,530 

Marc A. Duale

  4,828  3,789 

Eileen Sweeney

  1,738  1,364 

Vesting of 2015 Storage Revenue & ROIC PUs

        In 2015, certain of our Named Executive Officers, including Mr. Meaney, received an award of PUs, the payout for which was based on the Company's performance against storage revenue growth and ROIC measured at the conclusion of the three-year performance period ended December 31, 2017. In 2018, the Compensation Committee increased the total revenue target to ensure consistent performance measurement and give effect to acquisitions and dispositions, including Recall.

        Following the completion of the performance period, the Compensation Committee determined that award recipients had earned 51.8% of target for the 2015 Storage Revenue & ROIC PUs based on the Company's performance. The Company exceeded the minimum ROIC under the award, but the actual storage revenue was below the target established by the Compensation Committee due primarily to negative impact of the strengthening U.S. dollar during the performance period, and, as a result, PUs were earned below target level. The targets and actual results are detailed below.

 
 Threshold
(25% of Target)
 Target Maximum
(200% of Target)
 Actual Payout 

Storage Revenue (in thousands)

 $2,333 $2,456 $2,701 $2,377  51.8%


 
 Threshold Actual  
  
  
 

ROIC

  9.0% 10.8%         

        The table below details the target shares and the shares earned:

Named Executive Officer
 Target PUs Earned PUs 

William L. Meaney

  19,894  10,305 

Stuart Brown

  N/A  N/A 

Fidelma Russo

  N/A  N/A 

Ernest Cloutier

  4,506  2,334 

Patrick Keddy

  4,497  2,328 

Marc A. Duale

  4,828  2,500 

Eileen Sweeney

  1,738  900 

Vesting and Other Conditions on Equity Grants

        The Compensation Committee approves all equity incentive awards, including awards made to newly hired or promoted employees. Because the schedule for granting equity awards by the Compensation Committee and our Board is generally determined at meetings set many months in


Table of Contents

advance, the proximity of any grants to earnings announcements or other market events is merely coincidental.

        The Compensation Committee has imposed vesting and other conditions on awards of Common Stock or grants of options or other long-term equity vehicles, such as PUs and RSUs, because it believes that time-based and performance-based vesting encourages recipients to build stockholder value over a long period of time. Stock options and RSUs generally will vest ratably over a three-year period following the grant (except if accelerated pursuant to the change in control provisions described below). PUs that are achievedearned based on performance criteria are generally subject to vesting three years from the date of the original grant.grant, except for awards to new hires, which are aligned to the same vesting date as other recipients. However, PU awards made to Named Executive Officers and other employees who subsequently terminate their employment during the performance period and on or after attaining age 55 and completing ten years of employment with the Company will be eligible for pro-rated vesting based on the number of full years completed following the grant date, although the shares underlying the PU award will, nevertheless, be delivered in accordance with the original vesting schedule of the applicable PU award and remain subject to the same performance conditions.

        Notwithstanding the above, all unvested stock options and other equity awards granted under the 2002 Plan or the 2014 Plan will vest immediately should an employee be terminated by the Company, or terminate his or her own employment for "good reason,"reason" or be terminated by the Company, in connection with a "vesting change in control" within 14 days prior or 12 months after such vesting change of control, or the Relevant Period. This provision applies to all outstanding options and unvested RSUs or PUs held by employees of the Company, including Named Executive Officers.

        Additional detail regarding the potential acceleration of equity awards held by Named Executive Officers upon the termination circumstances described above and other circumstances is included in the "Termination"Compensation Tables—Termination and Change of Control Arrangements" section of this Proxy Statement.

Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines

        The Company maintains stock ownership guidelines that require that certain executive officers achieveExecutive Officers to obtain and maintain ownership of our Common Stock, at or above a prescribed level, exclusive of unexercised stock options, unvested RSUs and unearned or unvested PUs. The Company established this program to help align long-term interest of executive officers with stockholders. The guidelines


require certain executive officers own and retain Common Stock having a value equal to a multiple of such officer's annual base salaryPUs, as follows:

CEO 5X base salary
CFO 3X base salary
Executive Vice PresidentsEVPs reporting to the CEO 2X base salary

        The Company established this program to help align long-term interest of certain Executive Officers with stockholders. Compliance is measured by multiplying the number of shares owned at the close of business on October 1 of each year by the average closing price per share of Common Stock, based on each trading day's closing price as reported on the NYSE, over the 60 calendar days preceding the date of calculation. The stock ownership guidelines do not limit the transfer of, or require retention of, shares of Common Stock that were outstanding as of the date of adoption of the stock ownership guidelines or that are issued under any equity awards outstanding as of such date. Whenever an executiveEach Executive Officer subject to the Company's stock ownership guidelines does not meet the above minimum ownership threshold, such executive officer is required to retain an amount equal to 50% of the net shares received as a result of the vesting of RSUs or PUs until such executiveExecutive Officer meets the minimum ownership threshold. "Net shares" are those shares that remain after shares are sold or netted to pay withholding taxes and any purchase price. Because executives must retain a percentage of shares resulting from the vesting of RSUs or PUs until they achieve the minimum share ownership threshold, there is no minimum time period required to achieve the stock ownership guidelines.


Table of Contents

Employment Agreements

William L. Meaney

        In connection with his appointment as CEO of the Company, the Company entered into an offer letter with Mr. Meaney, or the CEO Offer Letter, which has no specified term, and Mr. Meaney's employment with the Company is on an at-willat will basis. In addition to standard TDC elements (salary and short-short and long-term incentives), the CEO Offer Letter includes the following provisions:

    the Company agreed to pay Mr. Meaney a portion of his salary in Swiss Francs because Mr. Meaney is a Swiss citizen and, as a result of his responsibilities associated with the significant international focus of the Company, he works a portion of his time in Switzerland;

    the Company agreed to reimburse Mr. Meaney for the cost of his Swiss medical insurance; and

    Mr. Meaney is eligible for the Iron Mountain Companies Severance Plan, as described in the "Severance"Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Components of Compensation—Severance Policy" section of this Proxy Statement, with the following adjustments: in the event Mr. Meaney terminates his employment for good reason or is terminated by the Company (other than for other than causecause) in connection with a change in control, he will be eligible for two years' salary and target bonus (rather than one year) and 18 months of group health benefit continuation (rather than 12 months).

        In December 2013, in order to implement the Swiss Franc salary payments agreed to in the CEO Offer Letter, and due to the customary nature of such agreements in Switzerland, a Swiss subsidiary of the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Meaney, or the Swiss Employment Agreement. As required by Swiss law, the Company, through such Swiss subsidiary, funds certain benefits on Mr. Meaney's behalf in connection with his Swiss employment, including an occupational benefit plan and occupational accident insurance. The Company's contribution levels reflect amounts required by Swiss law and are quantified in the "SummarySummary Compensation Table." The Swiss Employment Agreement has no fixed term and is terminable by either party following a one month notice period (except for certain acts identified by Swiss law).

        We do not have any agreements with Mr. Meaney or any other executive that provide for excise tax gross-up payments in connection with a change in control.


Roderick Day

        In connection with Mr. Day's appointment as CFO of the Company, the Company entered into an offer letter with Mr. Day, or the Day Offer Letter. Mr. Day will be eligible to receive severance benefits under the Iron Mountain Companies Severance Plan and Severance Program No. 1, or the Severance Program, with slight modifications as described under the "Termination and Change of Control Arrangements" section of this Proxy Statement. Mr. Day will also be eligible for transition-related benefits to accommodate his temporary split working location between London and Boston until his anticipated relocation to Boston in September 2016. In addition to base salary and short-term incentive compensation, Mr. Day will continue to receive a car allowance, a corresponding allowance for fuel costs, a yearly motor insurance supplement, a UK pension benefit and a UK life insurance benefit during his temporary split working arrangement. The Day Offer Letter has no fixed term and is terminable by either party. The Day Offer Letter superseded and replaced Mr. Day's prior employment contract with the Company, which terminated automatically upon the effectiveness of the Day Offer Letter.

Marc Duale

        Effective March 31, 2017, Mr. Duale resigned from his role as the Company's President, International, and Mr. Duale and the Company terminated the Duale Employment Agreement (as defined below) and entered into a separation agreement and a separate advisory agreement, the terms of which are more fully described under "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Components of Compensation—Severance Policy—Separation Agreement with Marc Duale" below.

        Mr. Duale, former President, Iron Mountain International, has had an employment contract with the Company sincefrom his initial hiring in May 2006, or the Duale Employment Agreement, as is customary for executives in Europe, where Mr. Duale is based.Europe. The Duale Employment Agreement was amended and restated in September 2011 and was further amended in March 2012 and February 2015, to provideand again further amended and restated in February 2016, or, as amended and restated, the Duale Employment Agreement. The Duale Employment Agreement provided him with the same benefits available to theour Named Executive Officers who are participants in the Severance Program except to the extent benefits under his employment contract or applicable Luxembourg law are more favorable. In addition to base salary and short-term incentive compensation, Mr. Duale also receivesreceived a car allowance, a corresponding allowance for fuel costs, monthly cash payments for life insurance, reimbursement for tax advisory services and payments for social security


Table of Contents

contributions in Belgium.

        In February 2016, Mr. Duale entered into an employment contract that amended and restated the The Duale Employment Agreement or the Amended and Restated Duale Employment Agreement. The Amended and Restated Duale Employment Agreement provides substantially the same benefits as the Duale Employment Agreement, with the following changes:

    extended the period under which Mr. Duale may provide notice termination for good reason in connection with a corporate realignment that occurred in April 2015 to the period from January 1, 2017 to June 30, 2017, subject to satisfying the following conditions:

    Mr. Duale provides eight weeks written notice of termination; and

    Mr. Duale must remain employed with the Company through June 30, 2017 and may terminate his employment no later than September 30, 2017; and

    clarified the method of delivering certain severance benefits without impacting the economic value of those benefits.

        The Amended and Restated Duale Employment Agreement has no fixed term and is terminable by either party. The Amended and Restated Duale Employment Agreement provides for a notice period of seven months if he is terminated by the Company (except in the case of gross misconduct) and a notice period of two months if he resigns. The Amended and Restated Duale Employment Agreement also providesprovided for certain payments upon termination of his employment.

Ernest Cloutier

        In connection with Mr. Cloutier's appointment as EVP & GM, International, effective April 1, 2017, Mr. Cloutier relocated to Switzerland in July 2017. In connection with his appointment and relocation, on March 27, 2017, the Company and Mr. Cloutier executed a letter agreement, or the Cloutier Letter, confirming the terms of Mr. Cloutier's international assignment. The Cloutier Letter is not a contract of employment but is intended to summarize the terms and benefits of Mr. Cloutier's international assignment. Under the terms of Mr. Cloutier's appointment, as described underin the "TerminationCloutier Letter, Mr. Cloutier's international assignment is expected to last approximately three years, and Changethe Company provides the following benefits during his international assignment:

    relocation support to allow efficient transfer of Control Arrangements" sectionworking location to Switzerland including work permit/visa expenses, moving expenses, home search assistance, cultural/language training and property management of this Proxy Statement. We believe theseMr. Cloutier's home in the United States;

    allowances while on assignment in Switzerland, including housing related costs, cost of living differential, education and child care assistance, car allowance and home leave; and

    tax equalization benefits are customary for executives in Europe in comparable roles.


    that provide tax-related payments designed to prevent Mr. Cloutier from paying more individual income tax as a result of his foreign assignment than he would have paid if no such assignment occurred.

Patrick Keddy

        In connection with Mr. Keddy's appointment as EVP & GM, North America & Western Europe, in April 2015 the Company entered into an amended and restated employment contract with Mr. Keddy, or the Keddy Employment Contract, as is customary for executives in England, where Mr. Keddy is based. In addition to base salary and short-term incentive compensation, Mr. Keddy will receivereceives a car allowance, a corresponding allowance for fuel costs, a UK pension contribution, or cash payment in lieu thereof, and a UK life insurance benefit. Mr. Keddy will beis eligible to receive severance benefits under the Severance Program. Mr. Keddy willis also be eligible for benefits to accommodate his dual working location between Londonthe United Kingdom and the United States. The Keddy Employment Contract has no fixed term and is terminable by either party with appropriate notice. The Keddy Employment Contract superseded and replaced Mr. Keddy's prior employment contract with the Company, which terminated automatically upon the effectiveness of the Keddy Employment Contract.

Severance Policy

        The Iron Mountain Companies Severance Plan, or the Severance Program, is applicable to certain of our senior executives, including Messrs. DayMr. Brown, Ms. Russo, Mr. Cloutier and Keddy and Ms. Evens.Mr. Keddy. The Severance Program was adopted in 2012 and modified in 2014 to align with market practice and to aid in the retention of our most critical employees. The Severance Program generally provides, in the case of termination of an executive's employment by the Company without cause or by the executive for good reason, for the payment of one year's salary, bonus, one year's accelerated vesting of RSUs, stock options and pro-ratedpro rated vesting of PUs as well as group health benefit continuation and nine months outplacement. Mr. Duale has identical accelerated vesting of equity as a result of the Amended and Restated Duale Employment Agreement.

        As provided for in the CEO Offer Letter, Mr. Meaney is a participant in the Iron Mountain Companies Severance Plan and Severance Program No. 2, or the CEO Severance Program. The CEO Severance Program generally provides, in the case of termination of Mr. Meaney's employment by the Company without cause or by the executive for good reason, for the payment of one year's base salary


Table of Contents

and target bonus, one year of group health benefit continuation, nine months outplacement and a pro-ratedpro rated bonus in the year of termination. Mr. Meaney does not receive equity acceleration benefits under the Severance Program. If Mr. Meaney's termination is in connection with a change in control, he will be eligible for two years' base salary and target bonus (rather than one year) and 18 months of group health benefit continuation (rather than 12 months), and the other benefits he would otherwise be entitled to remain unchanged. The CEO Severance Program also modifies the determination of a Vesting Change in Control (as defined in the CEO Severance Program) where termination following a Change in Control (as defined in the CEO Severance Program) is directed by a third party, within 90 days prior to the Change in Control (rather than 14 days) or within two years following the Change in Control (rather than 12 months).

        More specific detail is provided in the "Termination"Compensation Tables—Termination and Change of Control Arrangements" section of this Proxy Statement.

Separation and Advisory Agreements with Marc Duale

Duale Separation Agreement

        Effective March 31, 2017, the Company and Mr. Duale entered into an agreement outlining the terms and conditions of Mr. Duale's separation from the Company, or the Duale Separation Agreement. The Duale Separation Agreement provides substantially the same severance benefits as are contained in Mr. Duale's amended and restated employment agreement. Specifically, Mr. Duale receives certain benefits in accordance with the Duale Separation Agreement, including:(7)

    lump sum payment in the amount of €1,079,000 (approximately $1,218,731) which is substantially equivalent to the sum of (i) one year of Mr. Duale's annual base salary, plus (ii) a target bonus reflecting Mr. Duale's 2016 target bonus multiplied by the average bonus payout, as a percentage of target bonus, for 2014, 2015 and 2016, plus (iii) cash in lieu of 12 months of medical continuation;

    vesting of 6,289 PUs, representing 100% of the PU awards granted during 2015 after adjusting for final determination of performance achievement. The total vested PUs consists of 3,789 TSR-Based PUs (78.5% of 4,828 target PUs granted) and 2,500 Storage Revenue & ROIC PUs (51.8% of the 4,828 target PUs granted). The earned PUs were valued on the vesting date, February 20, 2018, at $240,707, including accrued dividends;

    accelerated vesting of 10,468 RSUs, plus accrued dividends, representing RSUs that were scheduled to vest within 12 months of Mr. Duale's separation. The RSUs were valued on the vesting date, March 30, 2017, at $400,906, including accrued dividends; and

    accelerated vesting of 8,935 stock options representing options that were scheduled to vest within 12 months of Mr. Duale's separation. As of the March 30, 2017 vesting date, the stock options had no intrinsic value.

        The total value of Mr. Duale's severance benefits is included in the "All Other Compensation" column of the "Compensation Tables—Summary Compensation Table—Summary Compensation Table for 2015, 2016 and 2017" section of this Proxy Statement.

Duale Advisory Agreement

        The Company and Mr. Duale entered into an advisory agreement effective as of May 1, 2017, pursuant to which Mr. Duale provides services to our CEO as a strategic advisor. The specific projects are mutually agreed upon between Mr. Duale and the Company and leverage Mr. Duale's international


(7)
Amounts delivered in local currency have been converted to U.S. Dollars at a conversion rate of €1.00 to $1.1295, the average exchange rate for fiscal 2017.

Table of Contents

expertise in evaluating innovation initiatives, data centers and Adjacent Businesses outside of North America. Under the terms of the advisory agreement, Mr. Duale receives a quarterly advisory fee of £107,000 when he is providing advisory services to the Company. The term of the advisory agreement is for up to 12 months and may be terminated by either party with no further compensation than for services performed. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, Mr. Duale continues to provide advisory services to the Company, and the Company extended the terms of the advisory agreement through May 1, 2019.

        The consulting fees paid to Mr. Duale in 2017, excluding VAT, are included in the "All Other Compensation" column of the "Compensation Tables—Summary Compensation Table—Summary Compensation Table for 2015, 2016 and 2017" section of this Proxy Statement.

Sweeney Separation Agreement

        Effective October 5, 2017, the Company and Ms. Sweeney entered into an agreement outlining the terms and conditions of Ms. Sweeney's separation from the Company, or the Sweeney Separation Agreement. Pursuant to the Sweeney Separation Agreement, Ms. Sweeney receives certain severance benefits, including:

    39 weeks of salary continuation paid bi-weekly, totaling $322,500;

    pro-rated short-term incentive payment in the amount of $197,290 reflecting pro-rated salary for 2017 and actual performance as described in the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Components of Compensation—Short-Term Performance-Based Incentive Compensation" section of this proxy statement;

    pro-rated vesting of target PUs awarded in 2015, 2016 and 2017 as follows (the actual number of PUs earned will be determined at the conclusion of the applicable performance period based on the Company's actual performance relative to the performance goals, with shares distributed in accordance with the original vesting date):

    vesting of 2,264 PUs, representing 100% of the PU awards granted during 2015 after adjusting for final performance achievement. The total vested PUs consists of 1,364 TSR-Based PUs (78.5% of 1,738 target PUs granted) and 900 Storage Revenue & ROIC PUs (51.8% of the 1,738 target PUs granted). The earned PUs were valued on the vesting date, February 20, 2018, at $86,653, including accrued dividends;

    vesting of a total of 3,412 target PUs representing 67% of the PU awards granted during 2016 and consisting of 1,706 TSR-based PUs and 1,706 Storage Revenue & ROIC PUs. The target PUs were valued on November 7, 2017, the vesting date, at $151,000, including accrued dividends; and

    vesting of a total of 1,350 target PUs representing 33% of the PU awards granted during 2017 and consisting of 675 TSR-based PUs and 675 Storage Revenue & ROIC PUs. The target PUs were valued on November 7, 2017, the vesting date, at $57,037, including accrued dividends;

    accelerated vesting of 14,414 RSUs, plus accrued dividends, representing shares that were scheduled to vest within nine months of Ms. Sweeney's separation. The RSUs were valued on November 7, 2017, the vesting date, at $657,167, including accrued dividends;

    accelerated vesting of 28,399 stock options representing options that were scheduled to vest within nine months of Ms. Sweeney's separation. The stock options were valued on the vesting date, November 7, 2017, at $183,490;

Table of Contents

    the employer share of the cost of medical and dental coverage under COBRA coverage until the earlier of (i) July 5, 2018 (39 weeks following separation) and (ii) the date on which COBRA coverage ends, estimated to be $11,886; and

    outplacement assistance in the amount of $1,050.

        The total value of Ms. Sweeney's severance benefits is included in the "All Other Compensation" column of the "Compensation Tables—Summary Compensation Table—Summary Compensation Table for 2015, 2016 and 2017" section of this Proxy Statement. In addition to her severance benefits, Ms. Sweeney also received a payout of her accrued vacation which is included in the "All Other Compensation" column of the "Compensation Tables—Summary Compensation Table—Summary Compensation Table for 2015, 2016 and 2017" section of this Proxy Statement.

Executive Compensation Clawback

        In order to ensure that the Company has the ability to recoup incentive compensation obtained through actions on the part of management that may prove detrimental to the Company, incentive compensation may be recovered at the discretion of the Board if an executive officer has engaged in fraudulent or other intentional misconduct and the misconduct resulted in a material inaccuracy in the Company's financial statements or performance metrics that affect such executive officer's compensation.


Insider Trading Policy and Prohibition on Hedging and Pledging

        Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits directors and senior executives from engaging in short-term or speculative transactions involving the Company's securities, such as short sales, buying or selling puts or calls and hedging transactions. The Insider Trading Policy also prohibits directors and executive officers from placing the Company's securities in margin accounts or otherwise pledging shares of Common Stock. No executive officer or director holds Company securities that are held in a margin account or otherwise pledged.

Tax Considerations

        The Compensation Committee's general policy is to attempt to structure our compensation arrangements to maximize deductions for federal income tax purposes. For example, our 2015 short-term performance-based incentive awards were issued under the 2014 Plan and required achievement of at least 90% of the Adjusted OIBDA target, which was set by the Compensation Committee and ratified by the Board, to fund bonus payouts. This goal was established primarily to maximize tax deductibility of the short-term performance-based incentive. The Compensation Committee may, however, authorize compensation arrangements that are partially or wholly nondeductible when such arrangements achieve organizational objectives. In 2015, the Compensation Committee approved performance-based equity awards to Mr. Keddy and Ms. Evens. The awards granted in May and July of 2015 are measured on the same performance goals as the awards provided to all other executives in February 2015 and are not intended to satisfy the performance-based exception under        Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code.

        Section 162(m) of the Code, previously generally disallows andisallowed a federal income tax deduction to public companies for compensation in excess of $1,000,000 paid in any year to the principal executive officer (in our case, the CEO) and certain other executive officers, to the extent that this compensation iswas not "performance based""performance-based" within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code. Our 2002 Plan, 2014 Plan and our other equity compensation plans (other than our 2013 ESPP) are generally designed such that compensation arising on the exercise of options and stock appreciation rights satisfies the "performance-based exemption" and is therefore always fully deductible as long as the exercise price at grant was at least equal to the Fair Market Value.satisfy this performance-based exemption. The 2002 Plan and the 2014 Plan also provide for the issuance of additional performance basedperformance-based equity and cash awards, which canare also be utilizedintended to maximizequalify for the deductibility of compensation paid to anyperformance-based exemption. Each of our employees. These various arrangements provide tax-efficient vehicles by whichplans, however, also authorizes the Compensation Committee can establish specific annualto grant compensation that is partially or wholly nondeductible.

        The Compensation Committee's general policy has been to utilize the performance-based exception under Section 162(m) of the Code to structure our compensation arrangements to maximize deductions for federal income tax purposes. For example, our 2017 short-term performance-based incentive awards were issued under the 2014 Plan and required achievement of at least 90% of the Adjusted EBITDA target, which was set by the Compensation Committee and ratified by the Board, to fund bonus payouts. This goal was established primarily to maximize tax deductibility of the short-term performance-based incentive.


Table of Contents

        The so-called Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 modified the group of individuals to whom payment of compensation in excess of $1,000,000 is not deductible to include the principal executive officer, the principal financial officer and the three other most highly compensated executive officers, and provided that each person covered by Section 162(m) of the Code for a particular year after 2016 will remain subject to this limit in subsequent years, even if not included in that group for the year. It also eliminated the performance goalsbased exemption from Section 162(m) of the Code. As a result, it is expected that certain of our compensation arrangements will be non-deductible when the total compensation exceeds $1,000,000 except certain historical awards which meet the transition rules under the Tax Cuts and objectives.Jobs Act.

Compensation Committee Report on Compensation Discussion and Analysis

        We, the members of the Compensation Committee of the Board of the Company, have reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with the Company's management. Based upon this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.2017.

 COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
PAMELA M. ARWAY,Chair CHAIR
CLARKE H. BAILEYPAUL DENINGER
PER-KRISTIANPER KRISTIAN HALVORSEN
WENDY J. MURDOCK

Table of Contents


MEDIAN EMPLOYEE TO CEO PAY RATIO

        As required by Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the ratio of the median annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of Mr. Meaney, our President and CEO. For the year ended December 31, 2017:

    the median of the annual total compensation of all of our employees other than our CEO as of October 1, 2017 was reasonably estimated to be $34,717;

    the annual total compensation of our CEO was $9,982,984; and

    based on this information, the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median annual total compensation of all of our other employees is estimated to be 288 to 1.

        The SEC's rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee's annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their employee populations and compensation practices. As a result, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies have different employee populations and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.

        To identify our median employee, we began by considering each individual employed by us worldwide on the determination date, except that we excluded approximately 1,199 employees located outside the United States as permitted by the de minimis exception within the SEC rules. Based on the de minimis exception, we excluded all individuals located in five (5) countries, which constituted approximately 4.80% of the 24,975 total individuals that we employed globally as of October 1, 2017. The excluded countries and the number of our employees in each excluded country are as follows: China (166), India (910), Indonesia (62), Serbia (60) and South Korea (1).

        For purposes of identifying the median employee from our employee population (other than those we excluded by reason of the de minimis exception), we considered base salary and base wages, as compiled from our payroll and employment records. We selected base salary and base wages to identify the median employee because these components represent the principal form of compensation delivered to all of our employees other than our CEO and this information is readily available across our workforce. Compensation paid in foreign currencies was converted to U.S. dollars based on exchange rates in effect on September 30, 2017.

        Once we identified our median employee, we aggregated all of the elements of that employee's compensation for 2017 in the same way that we calculate the annual total compensation of our Named Executive Officers in the Summary Compensation Table, except that the CEO's and median employee's annual total compensation includes company-paid healthcare benefit amounts of $13,949 and $4,091, respectively. This amount for the CEO is not included in the Summary Compensation Table because SEC allows companies to exclude items related to Company-paid healthcare benefits which are available generally to all salaried employees of the Company. To calculate our ratio, we divided CEO's annual total compensation by the median employee's annual total compensation. We believe this ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules.


Table of Contents


COMPENSATION TABLES

Summary Compensation Table

        The following table provides certain information concerning compensation earned by theour Named Executive Officers during the years ended December 31, 2013, 20142015, 2016 and 2015.2017. As required by SEC rules, the table includes:

    each person who served as our CEO or chief financial officer at any time during 2015; and2017;

    the three other most highly compensated persons serving as executive officers at year end; and

    two additional individuals who would have been three of our other most highly compensated persons serving as executive officers at year end but for the fact that such individuals were not serving as executive officers at year end.


Summary Compensation Table for 2013, 2014 andFor 2015, 2016 And 2017

Name and Principal Position
 Year Salary
($)(1)
 Bonus
($)
 Stock
Awards
($)(2)(3)
 Option
Awards
($)(3)(4)
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(5)
 All Other
Compensation
($)(6)
 Total
($)
 

William L. Meaney(7)

  2015 $1,003,846 $ $3,674,368 $1,572,134 $1,719,225 $46,162 $8,015,735 

President and Chief Executive

  2014 $1,003,846 $ $2,806,209 $1,341,786 $1,610,625 $77,947 $6,840,413 

Officer

  2013 $988,462 $250,000 $4,636,565 $2,013,155 $1,124,949 $753,485 $9,766,616 

Roderick Day(8)

  
2015
 
$

477,013
 
$

 
$

1,027,995
 
$

253,808
 
$

428,291
 
$

132,000
 
$

2,319,107
 

Chief Financial Officer

  2014 $471,462 $ $862,423 $223,937 $467,857 $187,244 $2,212,923 

  2013 $357,673 $ $613,953 $ $159,505 $48,832 $1,179,963 

Marc A. Duale(8)

  
2015
 
$

574,377
 
$

 
$

616,773
 
$

152,287
 
$

585,175
 
$

126,582
 
$

2,055,194
 

President, Iron Mountain

  2014 $688,351 $ $599,993 $170,703 $654,485 $139,977 $2,253,509 

International

  2013 $687,523 $ $899,942 $ $524,168 $154,023 $2,265,656 

Deirdre Evens(9)

  
2015
 
$

186,985
 
$

200,000
 
$

1,190,957
 
$

123,003
 
$

130,341
 
$

4,870
 
$

1,836,156
 

Chief People Officer

                         

Patrick Keddy(8)(10)

  
2015
 
$

447,313
 
$

 
$

602,602
 
$

152,531
 
$

340,334
 
$

85,941
 
$

1,628,721
 

EVP & GM, North America & Western Europe

                         
Name and Principal Position
 Year Salary
($)(1)
 Bonus
($)(2)
 Stock
Awards
($)(3)(4)
 Option
Awards
($)(4)(5)
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(6)
 All Other
Compensation
($)(7)
 Total
($)
 

William L. Meaney(8)

  2017 $1,000,000 $ $5,089,432 $2,024,791 $1,806,000 $48,816 $9,969,039 

President and Chief

  2016 $1,003,846 $ $4,114,035 $1,714,222 $1,568,633 $49,308 $8,450,044 

Executive Officer

  2015 $1,003,846 $ $3,674,368 $1,572,134 $1,719,225 $46,162 $8,015,735 

Stuart Brown

  
2017
 
$

550,000
    
$

1,040,964
 
$

239,973
 
$

516,120
 
$

21,504
 
$

2,368,561
 

Chief Financial Officer

  2016 $243,269 $200,000 $1,483,392 $121,815 $204,372 $334,593 $2,587,441 

Fidelma Russo(9)

  
2017
 
$

391,731
 
$

 
$

1,526,696
 
$

140,015
 
$

301,900
 
$

5,577
 
$

2,365,919
 

EVP & Chief Technology Officer

                         

Ernest Cloutier

  
2017
 
$

475,000
 
$

 
$

650,574
 
$

149,981
 
$

465,928
 
$

644,167
 
$

2,385,650
 

Executive Vice

  2016 $471,442 $ $615,949 $144,403 $455,309 $152,555 $1,839,658 

President & GM, International

  2015 $443,400 $ $575,655 $142,130 $393,728 $11,282 $1,566,195 

Patrick Keddy(10)

  
2017
 
$

431,614
 
$

 
$

693,948
 
$

159,980
 
$

444,043
 
$

88,265
 
$

1,817,850
 

EVP & GM, North

  2016 $426,162 $ $659,962 $154,719 $380,172 $104,415 $1,725,430 

America &Western Europe

  2015 $447,313 $ $602,602 $152,531 $340,334 $85,941 $1,628,721 

Marc A. Duale(10)(11)

  
2017
 
$

146,222
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

2,267,194
 
$

2,413,416
 

Former President, Iron

  2016 $572,875 $ $749,985 $ $555,437 $127,250 $2,005,547 

Mountain International

  2015 $574,377 $ $616,773 $152,287 $585,175 $126,582 $2,055,194 

Eileen Sweeney(10)(12)

  
2017
 
$

329,115
 
$

 
$

420,220
 
$

99,986
 
$

 
$

1,712,597
 
$

2,561,918
 

Former SVP & GM,

                         

Data Management

                         

(1)
Total reported reflects salary earned during the fiscal year, adjusted for changes in salary rates, where applicable. Salary for U.S.-based executives is paid bi-weekly with an hourly rate based on 2,080 hours per year, or 260 working days. Because fiscal 20142015 and 20152016 each included 261 working days, the total salary for Mr.Messrs. Meaney and Cloutier exceeds histhe annual base salary for each of 20142015 and 2015, and2016; the increase over the annualized salary represents the additional day of salary.

(2)
This amount represents a signing bonus provided to Mr. Brown upon the commencement of his employment with the Company in 2016. The bonus was paid in two equal annual installments.

(3)
The amounts reported in the "Stock Awards" column present the aggregate grant date fair value of awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. These amounts were not paid to or realized by the officer in the year indicated. The grant date fair values of PUs in the "SummarySummary Compensation Table"Table are calculated assuming target level attainment of each applicable performance goal, except for the TSR-Based PU awards. The TSR-Based PU awards include a market-basedmarket based performance condition and the fair value reflects the expected value of the award determined under a Monte Carlo simulation. The table below illustrates the expected value of PUs and the value if each recipient were to achieve the applicable maximum payout for all PUs. All values are determined as of the grant date.


2015 Awards

 
 Components of
Stock Awards
 Additional
Information
 
Name
 RSU Value
($)
 PU Value –
Expected
($)
 PU Value –
Maximum
($)
 

William L. Meaney

  2,059,970  1,614,398  3,089,936 

Roderick Day

  374,981  653,014  1,249,860 

Marc A. Duale

  224,981  391,792  749,885 

Deirdre Evens

  929,949  261,008  599,980 

Patrick Keddy

  264,975  337,627(a) 669,866(b)

(a)
Represents the aggregate expected value of 772 PUs granted on February 19, 2015 and 3,725 PUs granted on May 27, 2015.

(b)
Represents the aggregate maximum value of 772 PUs granted on February 19, 2015 and 3,725 PUs granted on May 27, 2015.

Table of Contents


20142017 Awards

 
 Components of
Stock Awards
 Additional
Information
 
Name
 RSU Value
($)
 PU Value –
Expected
($)
 PU Value –
Maximum
($)
 

William L. Meaney

  1,599,976  1,206,233(a) 2,399,945(b)

Roderick Day

  402,464  459,958  919,917 

Marc A. Duale

  224,994  374,999  749,998 

(a)
Represents the aggregate expected value of 23,751 PUs granted on February 13, 2014 and 23,452 PUs granted on March 14, 2014.

(b)
Represents the aggregate maximum value of 23,751 PUs granted on February 13, 2014 and 23,452 PUs granted on March 14, 2014.
 
 Components of Stock
Awards
 Additional
Information
 
Name
 RSU Value
($)
 PU Value –
Expected
($)
 PU Value –
Maximum
($)
 

William L. Meaney

  2,024,973  3,064,459  5,399,928 

Stuart Brown

  359,973  680,991  1,199,984 

Fidelma Russo

  1,109,950  416,745  699,926 

Ernest Cloutier

  224,997  425,577  749,916 

Patrick Keddy

  239,982  453,966  799,940 

Eileen Sweeney

  249,972  170,248  299,996 


20132016 Awards

 
 Components of
Stock Awards
 Additional
Information
 
Name
 RSU Value
($)
 PU Value –
Expected
($)
 PU Value –
Maximum
($)
 

William L. Meaney

  2,199,992  1,914,043  3,299,900 

Stuart Brown

  1,079,960  403,432  599,877 

Ernest Cloutier

  209,983  405,966  699,904 

Patrick Keddy

  224,998  434,964  749,897 

Marc A. Duale

  749,985     


2015 Awards

 
 Components of
Stock Awards
 Additional
Information
 
Name
 RSU Value
($)
 PU Value –
Expected
($)
 PU Value –
Maximum
($)
 

William L. Meaney

  2,081,599  2,554,966(a) 3,974,271(b)

Roderick Day

  556,968  56,985  85,478 

Marc A. Duale

  449,971  449,971  674,957 

 
 Components of
Stock Awards
 Additional
Information
 
Name
 RSU Value
($)
 PU Value –
Expected
($)
 PU Value –
Maximum
($)
 

William L. Meaney

  2,059,970  1,614,398  3,089,936 

Ernest Cloutier

  209,993  365,662  699,872 

Patrick Keddy

  264,975  337,627  669,866 

Marc A. Duale

  224,981  391,792  749,885 
(a)
Represents the aggregate expected value of 31,516 PUs granted on March 29, 2013 and 31,515 PUs granted on March 15, 2013.

(b)
Represents the aggregate maximum value of 31,516 PUs granted on March 29, 2013 and 31,515 PUs granted on March 15, 2013.
(3)(4)
For a list of 20152017 stock and option awards, see the "Grants of Plan-BasedPlan Based Awards" table below.

(4)(5)
The amounts reported in the "Option Awards" column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of stock options granted in the year indicated computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For 2014, the grant date fair value includes the sum of the fair value of the stock options as of the original grant dateplus the incremental fair value as a result of a special distribution made in November 2014, or the Special Distribution. In 2014, in connection with the Special Distribution, we made adjustments to existing stock option awards in order to maintain the same intrinsic value of the stock option awards following the impact of the cash portion of the Special Distribution. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 2 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company's Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013,2015, 2016 and the Company's Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the years ended 2014 and 2015, as restated in the Company's Current Reports on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on May 5, 2014 and May 7, 2015, respectively.2017. These amounts were not paid toout or realized by the officer in the year indicated.

(5)(6)
The amounts reported in the "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" column reflect amounts paid to theour Named Executive Officers under our non-equity incentive compensation plans based on the achievement of selected performance targets earned in the specified year and paid in the following year. Non-equity incentive compensation awards are calculated based on the individual'sapplicable Named Executive Officer's base salary earnings before any deductions or deferrals, such as 401(k) contributions or deferred compensation plan contributions. Details regarding the calculation of these payments are included in the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section of this Proxy Statement.

(6)(7)
The amounts reported in the "All Other Compensation" column include 401(k) Plan Company match, income on premiums paid with respect to group term life insurance, or GTLI, parking fees paid and certain expenses associated with hosting the Company-paid portion of direct expenses (primarily spousal travel related to attendance atCompany's annual business recognition events).event and related tax gross-ups.

        With respect to Mr. Meaney, the amounts reported in the "All Other Compensation" column include payment for medical insurance in Switzerland and, for fiscal year 2013 and a portion of fiscal year 2014, our international medical insurance program. In fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2014, membersSwitzerland. Members of Mr. Meaney's family occasionally accompanied him on business-relatedbusiness related travel where their presence was relevant to the meeting. The cost of commercial flights is included in All Other Compensation for the relevant year whileon private aircraft. Private flights have nonominal incremental cost to the Company. Mr. Meaney received a tax gross-up on income associated withCompany, and this travelcost is included in each year."All Other Compensation" column. The "Swiss Benefits" have been converted to U.S. dollars using a conversionthe average exchange rate offor each year (1 Swiss Franc to $1.0159 for fiscal year 2017, 1 Swiss Franc to $1.015 for fiscal year 2016 and 1 Swiss Franc to $1.0405 which represents the average exchange rate for fiscal year 2015, a conversion rate of 1 Swiss Franc to $1.0937, which represents the average exchange rate for fiscal year 2014, and a conversion rate of 1 Swiss Franc to $1.1181, which represents the average exchange rate for the period from the adoption of the Swiss Employment Agreement through the end of fiscal 2013.2015).


Table of Contents

            With respect to Mr. Day,Brown, the amounts reported in the "All Other Compensation" column include temporary U.S. housing, apayments related to his relocation from the Denver, Colorado area to the Boston, Massachusetts area, and associated tax gross-up payments in connection with the commencement of his employment with the Company.

            With respect to Mr. Cloutier, the amounts reported in the "All Other Compensation" column include costs related to his relocation from the Boston, Massachusetts area to Zurich, Switzerland, his assignment related benefits while in Switzerland, and associated estimated tax equalization payments for 2017 tax liabilities, all in connection with his appointment as Executive Vice President & GM, International in 2017 and in accordance with the Cloutier Letter. As part of Mr. Cloutier's tax equalization benefits, the Company makes payments to various tax authorities such that Mr. Cloutier's tax liability is substantially the same as it would have been had he remained in the United States and not received any assignment-related benefits. The value of the tax equalization payments has been estimated because the total 2017 tax liabilities have not yet been finally determined.

            With respect to Mr. Keddy, the amounts reported in the "All Other Compensation" column include amounts related to his international role, spousal travel associated with Mr. Keddy's U.S.-based responsibilities and related tax gross-up on (1) the imputed income therefromgross-ups, and (2)tax gross-ups related to hotel lodging expense deemed taxable in the United Kingdom, spousal travel to the U.S. associated with Mr. Day's U.S.-based responsibilities and a related tax gross-up on the imputed income therefrom,all in accordance with the Day Offer Letter, and amounts as set forth below related to his international role.Keddy Employment Contract. The hotel lodging expense is not reported in the "All Other Compensation" because it is directly and integrally related to performing job duties, notwithstanding its taxability within the United Kingdom.

            With respect to Mr. Duale, the amounts reported in the "All Other Compensation" column include amounts as set forth below related to his international role.role, separation payments and consulting fees associated with the Duale Advisory Agreement.

            With respect to Mr. Keddy,Ms. Sweeney, the amounts reported in the "All Other Compensation" column include a tax gross-up on the imputed income associated with hotel lodging expense deemed taxable in the United Kingdom, spousal travel to the U.S. associated with Mr. Keddy's U.S.-based responsibilities and a related tax gross-up on the imputed income therefrom, in accordance with the Keddy Employment Contract,severance payments and the amounts set forth below relate to his international role. The hotel lodging expense is not reported inpayment of accrued vacation following her separation from the "All Other Compensation" because it is directly and integrally related to performing job duties, notwithstanding its taxability within the United Kingdom.Company.

            The charts below set forth a more detailed breakdown of "All Other Compensation" for 2015.2017.


 William L.
Meaney
 Deirdre
Evens
  William L.
Meaney
 Stuart
Brown
 Fidelma
Russo
 Ernest
Cloutier
 Eileen
Sweeney
 

401K Match

 $5,300 $2,377 

GTLI

 $222 $93 

401(k) Match

 $5,400 $5,400 $5,410 $1,827 $5,400 

Group Term Life Insurance

 $222 $222 $167 $222 $185 

Company Recognition Event Expenses

 $ $ $ $433 $ 

Tax Gross-Up for Company Recognition Event Expenses

 $ $ $ $25 $ 

Relocation Costs

 $ $5,454 $ $ $ 

Tax Gross-up for Relocation

 $ $5,038 $ $ $ 

Relocation & Assignment Costs

 $ $ $ $361,531 $ 

Tax Equalization for Relocation & Assignment

 $ $ $ $265,328 $ 

Family Travel

 $8 $ $ $ $ 

Parking

 $7,800 $2,400  $7,800 $5,390 $ $3,430 $ 

Swiss Benefits

 $10,297 $  $10,023 $ $ $ $ 

Swiss Medical Insurance

 $22,543 $  $25,363 $ $ $ $ 

International Medical Insurance

 $ $ $ $11,371 $ 

Accrued Vacation

 $ $ $ $ $38,939 

Severance

 $ $ $ $ $1,668,073 

Total

 $46,162 $4,870  $48,816 $21,504 $5,577 $644,167 $1,712,597 

 

 
 Roderick
Day
 Marc A.
Duale
 Patrick
Keddy
 

Car Allowance ($)

 $14,676 $27,709 $14,676 

Fuel Allowance ($)

 $3,057 $2,771 $3,057 

Car Insurance ($)

 $841 $ $ 

Medical Insurance ($)

 $1,579 $47,991 $1,579 

Tax Planning Services ($)

 $5,517 $7,286 $ 

Belgium Social Security Contributions ($)

 $ $18,405 $ 

Life Insurance ($)

 $1,989 $ $1,989 

Life Assurance Cash Payment ($)

 $ $22,184 $ 

Employer Pension Scheme Contribution ($)

 $35,776 $ $33,548 

Temporary Accommodation Expenses ($)

 $15,438 $ $ 

Tax Gross-up for Temporary Accommodation & Taxable Lodging Expenses ($)

 $35,193 $ $10,847 

Company Recognition Event Expenses (including Spousal Travel) ($)

 $ $236 $1,673 

Tax Gross-Up for Company Recognition Event Expenses ($)

 $ $ $1,483 

Spousal Travel associated with International Role($)

 $9,699 $ $9,242 

Tax Gross-Up for Spousal Travel associated with International Role ($)

 $8,235 $ $7,847 

Total ($)

 $132,000 $126,582 $85,941 
 
 Marc A.
Duale
 Patrick
Keddy
 

Car Allowance

 $6,850 $12,369 

Fuel Allowance

 $706 $2,577 

Medical Insurance

 $14,289 $2,168 

Tax Planning Services

 $2,381 $5,618 

Belgium Social Security Contributions

 $9,353 $ 

Life Insurance

 $ $2,081 

Life Assurance Cash Payment

 $5,648 $ 

Employer Pension Scheme Contribution or cash in lieu

 $ $28,411 

Tax Gross-up for Taxable Lodging Expenses

 $ $18,429 

Company Recognition Event Expenses (including Spousal Travel)

 $ $2,101 

Tax Gross-Up for Company Recognition Event Expenses

 $ $1,864 

Spousal Travel associated with International Role

 $ $6,703 

Tax Gross-Up for Spousal Travel associated with International Role

 $ $5,944 

Severance

 $1,860,344 $ 

Consulting Fees

 $367,623 $ 

Total ($)

 $2,267,194 $88,265 

Table of Contents

(7)(8)
Mr. Meaney's 20152017, 2016 and 20142015 salary includes 100,000 Swiss Francs paid in accordance with the Swiss Employment Agreement, converted to U.S. dollars using a conversionthe average exchange rate offor each year (1 Swiss Franc to $1.0159 for fiscal year 2017, 1 Swiss Franc to $1.015 for fiscal year 2016 and 1 Swiss Franc to $1.0405 which represents the average exchange rate for fiscal 2015 and using a conversion rateyear 2015).

(9)
Ms. Russo was appointed as EVP, Chief Technology Officer of 1 Swiss Franc to $1.0937, which represents the average exchange rate for fiscal 2014. Mr. Meaney joined the Company as President and CEO in January 2013, and his 2013 salary includes 3,763 Swiss Francs earned following the adoption of the Swiss Employment Agreement, converted to U.S. dollars using a conversion rate of 1 Swiss Franc to $1.1181 which represents the average exchange rate for the period from the adoption of the Swiss Employment Agreement through the end of fiscal 2013.March 2017.

(8)(10)
Messrs. Day and2017 compensation for Mr. Keddy and Mr. Duale's 2015 compensation,Duale, except for certain tax planning services denominated in U.S. dollars, was converted to U.S. dollars using a conversion rate of £1.00 to $1.5287$1.2884 for Mr. Keddy and €1.00 to $1.1092, respectively,$1.1295 for Mr. Duale, which represent the average exchange rates for fiscal year 2015.2017. The corresponding conversion rate for 20142016 compensation, determined on the same basis, for Mr. Day and Mr. Duale was £1.00 to $1.6484$1.3501 for Mr. Keddy and €1.00 to $1.3293, respectively.$1.1063 for Mr. Duale. The corresponding conversion rate for 20132015 compensation, determined on the same basis, for Mr. Day and Mr. Duale was £1.00 to $1.5640$1.5287 for Mr. Keddy and €1.00 to $1.3277, respectively.$1.1092 for Mr. Duale.

(9)(11)
Mr. Duale served as President, International through March 31, 2017. Mr. Duale continues to provide advisory services to the Company as disclosed in the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Components of Compensation—Severance Policy—Separation and Advisory Agreements with Marc Duale" section of this Proxy Statement.

(12)
Ms. Evens was appointedSweeney served as an executive officer of the company in connection with her joining the company as EVP, Chief People Officer in July 2015.

(10)
Mr. Keddy was appointed as an executive officer of the company effective April 2015 in connection with his appointment as EVPSVP & GM, North America & Western Europe.Data Management through October 5, 2017. In accordance with the Sweeney Separation Agreement, 7,592 stock options, 2,249 RSUs and 1,350 PUs previously granted to Mr. Sweeney in 2017 vested on November 7, 2017 (although the PU awards remain subject to performance adjustment and settlement). As a result, Ms. Sweeney's 2017 compensation includes the grant value of these awards and also includes the value of these awards at the vesting date.

Table of Contents


Grants of Plan-BasedOf Plan Based Awards for 2015For 2017

        The following table sets forth certain information concerning the grants of plan-basedplan based awards to theour Named Executive Officers during the year ended December 31, 2015.2017. For a description of these awards, see the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section of this Proxy Statement.


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock
or Units
(#)(4)
 All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)(5)
  
 Closing
Market
Price
on the
Date
of
Grant
($/Sh)
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock
or Units
(#)(4)
 All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)(5)
  
  
 

  
  
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(2)
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(3)
 Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)(5)
 Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and
Option
Awards
($)
   
  
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(2)
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(3)
 Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/ Sh)(5)
 Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and
Option
Awards
($)
 
Named Executive Officer
 Grant
Date
 Award
Date(1)
 Threshold
($)
 Target
($)
 Maximum
($)
 Threshold
(#)
 Target
(#)
 Maximum
(#)
Closing
Market
Price
on the
Date
of
Grant
($/Sh)
 Grant
Date
 Award
Date(1)
 Threshold
($)
 Target
($)
 Maximum
($)
 Threshold
(#)
 Target
(#)
 Maximum
(#)
 

William L. Meaney

 n/a n/a $ $1,350,000 $2,261,250 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a $ $1,500,000 $2,512,500 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 

 2/19/2015 2/19/2015 n/a n/a n/a n/a 19,894 39,788 n/a n/a n/a n/a $772,484 2/16/2017 2/16/2017 n/a n/a n/a n/a 36,486 72,972 n/a n/a n/a $1,349,982 

 2/19/2015 2/19/2015 n/a n/a n/a n/a 19,894 39,788 n/a n/a n/a n/a $841,914  2/16/2017 2/16/2017 n/a n/a n/a n/a 36,486 72,972 n/a n/a n/a $1,714,477 

 2/19/2015 2/19/2015 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 53,051 n/a n/a n/a $2,059,970  2/16/2017 2/16/2017 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 54,729 n/a n/a $2,024,973 

 2/19/2015 2/19/2015 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 349,247 $48.54 $38.83 $1,572,134  2/16/2017 2/16/2017 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 461,696 $37.00 $2,024,791 

Roderick Day

 
n/a
 
n/a
 
$

 
$

381,212
 
$

638,530
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 

Stuart Brown

 
n/a
 
n/a
 
$

 
$

467,500
 
$

783,063
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 

 2/19/2015 2/18/2015 n/a n/a n/a n/a 8,047 16,094 n/a n/a n/a n/a $312,465  2/16/2017 2/15/2017 n/a n/a n/a n/a 8,108 16,216 n/a n/a n/a $299,996 

 2/19/2015 2/18/2015 n/a n/a n/a n/a 8,047 16,094 n/a n/a n/a n/a $340,549  2/16/2017 2/15/2017 n/a n/a n/a n/a 8,108 16,216 n/a n/a n/a $380,995 

 2/19/2015 2/18/2015 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 9,657 n/a n/a n/a $374,981  2/16/2017 2/15/2017 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 9,729 n/a n/a $359,973 

 2/19/2015 2/18/2015 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 44,581 $38.83 $38.83 $253,808  2/16/2017 2/15/2017 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 54,719 $37.00 $239,973 

Marc A. Duale

 
n/a
 
n/a
 
$

 
$

459,502
 
$

769,666
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 

Fidelma Russo

 n/a n/a $ $273,461 $458,047 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 

 2/19/2015 2/18/2015 n/a n/a n/a n/a 4,828 9,656 n/a n/a n/a n/a $187,471  3/13/2017 2/15/2017 n/a n/a n/a n/a 5,145 10,290 n/a n/a n/a $174,981 

 2/19/2015 2/18/2015 n/a n/a n/a n/a 4,828 9,656 n/a n/a n/a n/a $204,321  3/13/2017 2/15/2017 n/a n/a n/a n/a 5,145 10,290 n/a n/a n/a $241,764 

 2/19/2015 2/18/2015 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 5,794 n/a n/a n/a $224,981  3/13/2017 2/15/2017 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 32,636 n/a n/a $1,109,950 

 2/19/2015 2/18/2015 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 26,749 $38.83 $38.83 $152,287  3/13/2017 2/15/2017 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 36,910 $34.01 $140,015 

Deirdre Evens

 
n/a
 
n/a
 
$

 
$

111,071
 
$

186,044
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 

Ernest Cloutier

 
n/a
 
n/a
 
$

 
$

403,750
 
$

676,281
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 

 7/21/2015 7/21/2015 n/a n/a n/a n/a 4,783 9,566 n/a n/a n/a n/a $149,995  2/16/2017 2/15/2017 n/a n/a n/a n/a 5,067 10,134 n/a n/a n/a $187,479 

 7/21/2015 7/21/2015 n/a n/a n/a n/a 4,783 9,566 n/a n/a n/a n/a $111,013  2/16/2017 2/15/2017 n/a n/a n/a n/a 5,067 10,134 n/a n/a n/a $238,098 

 7/21/2015 7/21/2015 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 29,654 n/a n/a n/a $929,949  2/16/2017 2/15/2017 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 6,081 n/a n/a $224,997 

 7/21/2015 7/21/2015 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 32,087 $31.36 $31.36 $123,003  2/16/2017 2/15/2017 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 34,199 $37.00 $149,981 

Patrick Keddy

 
n/a
 
n/a
 
$

 
$

302,923
 
$

507,396
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
  n/a n/a $ $368,807 $617,752 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 

 2/19/2015 2/18/2015 n/a n/a n/a n/a 772 1,544 n/a n/a n/a n/a $29,977  2/16/2017 2/15/2017 n/a n/a n/a n/a 5,405 10,810 n/a n/a n/a $199,985 

 2/19/2015 2/18/2015 n/a n/a n/a n/a 772 1,544 n/a n/a n/a n/a $32,671  2/16/2017 2/15/2017 n/a n/a n/a n/a 5,405 10,810 n/a n/a n/a $253,981 

 5/27/2015 5/27/2015 n/a n/a n/a n/a 3,725 7,450 n/a n/a n/a n/a $137,490  2/16/2017 2/15/2017 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 6,486 n/a n/a $239,982 

 5/27/2015 5/27/2015 n/a n/a n/a n/a 3,725 7,450 n/a n/a n/a n/a $137,490  2/16/2017 2/15/2017 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 36,479 $37.00 $159,980 

Eileen Sweeney

 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
$

258,000
 
$

432,150
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 
n/a
 

 2/19/2015 2/18/2015 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 2,575 n/a n/a n/a $99,987  2/16/2017 2/15/2017 n/a n/a n/a n/a 2,027 4,054 n/a n/a n/a $74,999 

 5/27/2015 5/27/2015 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 4,470 n/a n/a n/a $164,988  2/16/2017 2/15/2017 n/a n/a n/a n/a 2,027 4,054 n/a n/a n/a $95,249 

 2/19/2015 2/18/2015 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 7,133 $38.83 $38.83 $40,609  2/16/2017 2/15/2017 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 6,756 n/a n/a $249,972 

 5/27/2015 5/27/2015 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 22,102 $36.91 $36.91 $111,922  2/16/2017 2/15/2017 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 22,799 $37.00 $99,986 

(1)
For grants made in February 2017 to executives other than Mr. Meaney and Ms. Russo, the Compensation Committee approved the RSU and stock option awards on February 18, 2015,15, 2017, with a grant date of February 19, 2015,16, 2017, to align with Mr. Meaney's awards granted on that date. For Ms. Russo, the Compensation Committee approved her awards on February 15, 2017 with a grant date of March 13, 2017, the date her employment with the Company commenced.

(2)
The amounts reported in the "Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards" column, sub-column "Threshold,"Threshold" and sub-column "Maximum," reflect the minimum and maximum payment level of short-term incentive compensation for each of theour Named Executive Officers, which is zero for all. The amounts reported in "Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards" column, sub-column "Maximum," reflect that for 2015 our equity compensation plans provided the potential to earn a maximum ofand 167.5% of target.target, respectively. The specific components of our non-equity incentive plans are described in the "Short-Term Performance-Based Incentive Compensation" section of this Proxy Statement. The "Target" and "Maximum" amounts are based on the Named Executive Officer's base salary earnings and position in 2015.2017. Non-equity incentive plan awards actually paid by the Company for services rendered in 20152017 are reported in the "Non- Equity"Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" column of the "SummarySummary Compensation Table"Table above. For Ms. Sweeney, the "Target" and "Maximum" amounts have been calculated assuming a full year of employment, but Ms. Sweeney received a pro-rated portion of such amounts reflecting her service through her separation date. The actual amounts paid to Ms. Sweeney are included in the "All Other Compensation" amount as a component of her separation payments.

(3)
The amounts reported in "Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards" column, sub-column "Maximum," reflect that the PUs awarded in 2015 provided2017 provide the potential to earn up to 200% of target, as described in the "Performance"Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Components of Compensation—Long-Term Equity Compensation—2017 Long-Term Incentive Awards—Performance Units—Storage Revenue & ROIC" and "Performance"—Performance Units—Total Stockholder Return" sections of this Proxy Statement.

(4)
Each RSU award was granted under the 2014 Plan, and each RSU award vests in three substantially equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date. Each RSU award is settled in shares of Common Stock on each vesting date.

(5)
Each stock option award was granted under the 2014 Plan, and each stock option award vests in three substantially equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date. The exercise price

Table of Mr. Meaney's stock options was set at 125% of Fair Market Value.

        The amounts in the "Summary Compensation Table" for 2013, 2014 and 2015 reflect our compensation programs and plans, all of which are developed under our compensation philosophy of "paying for


Contents

performance." Each element of compensation (salary, non-equity incentive compensation, equity incentive compensation and benefits) is designed to work together to help us meet and exceed our short-term and long-term goals and objectives and reward Named Executive Officers when we and they are successful. Our compensation programs provide the opportunity for the alignment of interests of our Named Executive Officers and directors with those of our stockholders. For a description of the material factors related to an understanding of these amounts, see the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section of this Proxy Statement.

        The following table sets forth certain information with respect to outstanding equity awards held by our Named Executive Officers at December 31, 2015.2017. The Market Value wasamounts reported in the Stock Awards columns heading were determined using the closing price of our Common Stock of $27.01$37.73 on December 31, 2015.


29, 2017.


Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-EndYear End for 20152017

 
 Option Awards Stock Awards 
Named Executive Officer
 Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options:
Exercisable
(#)
 Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options:
Unexercisable
(#)
 Option
Exercise
Price
($)
 Option
Expiration
Date
 Number of
Shares or
Units
of Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
 Market
Value
of Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not Vested
($)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Units That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
Value of
Unearned
Units That
Have Not
Vested
($)
 

William L. Meaney

  191,934  96,260(1)$29.99  1/7/2023             

  90,969  182,215(2)$31.00  2/13/2024             

    349,247(3)$48.54  2/19/2025             

              68,158(4)$1,840,948       

              23,868(5)$644,675       

              42,248(6)$1,141,118       

              53,051(7)$1,432,908       

                    17,039(8)$460,223 

                    11,875(9)$320,744 

                    5,863(10)$158,360 

                    9,947(11)$268,668 

                    4,973(12)$134,321 

Roderick Day

  
927
  
 
$

21.65
  
9/11/2018
             

  6,963   $22.98  6/4/2019             

  15,699   $19.11  12/10/2019             

  6,051   $19.83  6/3/2020             

  1,265   $22.79  3/11/2021             

  2,334  4,677(2)$24.80  2/13/2024             

  9,187  18,407(13)$25.12  3/14/2024             

    44,581(3)$38.83  2/19/2025             

              569(14)$15,369       

              1,190(5)$32,142       

              7,006(15)$189,232       

              2,641(6)$71,333       

              6,258(16)$169,029       

              9,657(7)$260,836       

              1,237(17)$33,411       

                    586(10)$15,828 

                    3,908(10)$105,555 

                    4,023(11)$108,661 

                    2,011(12)$54,317 

Marc A. Duale

  
11,345
  
22,692

(18)

$

22.04
  
3/1/2019
             

  8,756  17,540(2)$24.80  2/13/2024             

    26,749(3)$38.83  2/19/2025             

              4,483(14)$121,086       

              9,401(5)$253,921       

              5,942(6)$160,493       

              5,794(7)$156,496       

                    3,664(10)$98,965 

                    2,414(11)$65,202 

                    1,207(12)$32,601 

Deirdre Evens

  
  
32,087

(19)

$

31.36
  
7/21/2025
             

              29,654(20)$800,955       

                    2,391(11)$64,581 

                    1,195(12)$32,277 
 
 Option Awards Stock Awards 
Named Executive Officer
 Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options:
Exercisable
(#)
 Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options:
Unexercisable
(#)
 Option
Exercise
Price
($)
 Option
Expiration
Date
 Number of
Shares or
Units
of Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
 Market
Value
of Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not Vested
($)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Units That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
Value of
Unearned
Units That
Have Not
Vested ($)
 

William L. Meaney

  10,002   $29.99  1/7/2023             

  273,184   $31.00  2/13/2024             

  232,598  116,649(1)$48.54  2/19/2025             

  276,225  553,281(2)$36.59  2/18/2026             

    461,696(3)$37.00  2/16/2027             

              34,081(4)$1,285,876       

              17,720(5)$668,576       

              50,134(6)$1,891,556       

              54,729(7)$2,064,925       

                    4,973(8)$187,631 

                    9,947(9)$375,300 

                    7,046(10)$265,846 

                    14,092(11)$531,691 

                    18,243(12)$688,308 

                    18,243(13)$688,308 

Stuart Brown

  
7,217
  
14,456

(14)

$

41.11
  
7/25/2026
             

    54,719(3)$37.00  2/16/2027             

              17,523(15)$661,143       

              9,729(7)$367,075       

                    912(10)$34,410 

                    1,824(11)$68,820 

                    4,054(12)$152,957 

                    4,054(13)$152,957 

Fidelma Russo

  
  
36,910

(16)

$

34.01
  
3/13/2027
             

              32,636(17)$1,231,356       

                    2,572(12)$97,042 

                    2,572(13)$97,042 

Ernest Cloutier

  
21,037
  
 
$

24.80
  
2/13/2024
             

  16,626  8,339(1)$38.83  2/19/2025             

  15,322  30,692(2)$29.27  2/18/2026             

    34,199(3)$37.00  2/16/2027             

              1,807(5)$68,178       

              4,786(6)$180,576       

              6,081(7)$229,436       

                    1,126(8)$42,484 

                    2,253(9)$85,006 

                    1,494(10)$56,369 

                    2,989(11)$112,775 

                    2,533(12)$95,570 

                    2,533(13)$95,570 

Table of Contents

 
 Option Awards Stock Awards 
Named Executive Officer
 Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options:
Exercisable
(#)
 Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options:
Unexercisable
(#)
 Option
Exercise
Price
($)
 Option
Expiration
Date
 Number of
Shares or
Units
of Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
 Market
Value
of Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not Vested
($)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Units That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
Value of
Unearned
Units That
Have Not
Vested
($)
 

Patrick Keddy

  42,843   $24.08  11/29/2021             

  2,334  4,677(2)$24.80  2/13/2024             

    7,133(3)$38.83  2/19/2025             

    22,102(21)$36.91  5/27/2025             

              474(14)$12,803       

              991(5)$26,767       

              2,641(6)$71,333       

              2,575(7)$69,551       

              4,470(22)$120,735       

                    586(10)$15,828 

                    386(11)$10,426 

                    193(12)$5,213 

                    1,862(11)$50,293 

                    931(12)$25,146 
 
 Option Awards Stock Awards 
Named Executive Officer
 Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options:
Exercisable
(#)
 Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options:
Unexercisable
(#)
 Option
Exercise
Price
($)
 Option
Expiration
Date
 Number of
Shares or
Units
of Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
 Market
Value
of Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not Vested
($)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Units That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
Value of
Unearned
Units That
Have Not
Vested ($)
 

Patrick Keddy

  4,750  2,383(1)$38.83  2/19/2025             

  14,719  7,383(18)$36.91  5/27/2025             

    32,884(2)$29.27  2/18/2026             

    36,479(3)$37.00  2/16/2027             

              861(5)$32,486       

              1,493(19)$56,331       

              5,128(6)$193,479       

              6,486(7)$244,717       

                    193(8)$7,282 

                    386(9)$14,564 

                    931(8)$35,127 

                    1,862(9)$70,253 

                    1,601(10)$60,406 

                    3,202(11)$120,811 

                    2,702(12)$101,946 

                    2,702(13)$101,946 

Marc A. Duale

                    
1,207

(8)

$

45,540
 

                    2,414(9)$91,080 

Eileen Sweeney

                    
434

(8)

$

16,375
 

                    869(9)$32,787 

                    426(10)$16,073 

                    853(11)$32,184 

                    337(12)$12,715 

                    337(13)$12,715 

(1)
Options vestvested on January 7, 2016.February 19, 2018.

(2)
Options vest in two substantially equal installments on February 13, 201618, 2018 and February 13, 2017.18, 2019.

(3)
Options vest in three substantially equal installments on February 19, 2016,16, 2018, February 19, 201716, 2019 and February 19, 2018.16, 2020.

(4)
RSUs vest 25% on January 7, 2016, 25% on January 7, 2017 and 50%vested on January 7, 2018.

(5)
PUs earned as a result of achievement of 2013 revenue growth and ROIC relative to performance targets vest in one installmentRSUs vested on March 15, 2016.February 19, 2018.

(6)
RSUs vest in two substantially equal installments on February 13, 201618, 2018 and February 13, 2017.18, 2019.

(7)
RSUs vest in three substantially equal installments on February 19, 2016,16, 2018, February 19,16, 2019 and February 16, 2020.

(8)
The number of 2015 Storage Revenue & ROIC PUs included in the table reflects performance at the threshold level, which would result in a payout of 25% of the award. After the end of the 2017 andfiscal year, the Company's performance was finally determined to exceed the threshold, resulting in a payout of 51.8% of target. The actual earned PUs vested in one installment on February 19, 2018.

(8)(9)
TSR-Based PUs will be earned based on 3-year TSR performance ending on December 31, 2015 relative to the S&P 500 (excluding financial services companies). The performance range on this award will be 0% to 200% of the target award. The number of 2015 TSR-Based PUs included abovein the table reflects performance at the threshold performance level, although the Company did not meet the minimum performance level relative to the peer group and, consequently, all shares were forfeited.

(9)
TSR-Based PUs will be earned based on 3-year TSR performance ending on December 31, 2016 relative to the S&P 500 (excluding financial services companies). The performance range on this award will be 0% to 200%which would result in a payout of 50% of the target award. The number of TSR-Based PUs included above reflects the threshold performance level. Final relative TSR performance will not be measured untilAfter the end of the 2017, the Company's performance period andwas finally determined to exceed the finalthreshold, resulting in a payout of 78.5% of target. The actual earned TSR-Based PUs vested in one installment on February 19, 2018.

(10)
The number of 2016 Storage Revenue & ROIC PUs included in the table reflects performance at the threshold level, which would result may vary fromin a payout of 25% of the award. The Company's performance will be finally determined at the end of 2018. Earned PUs, if any, will vest in one installment on February 18, 2019.

(11)
The number of 2016 TSR-Based PUs included in the table reflects TSR performance at the threshold level, illustrated above, and couldwhich would result in a payout of 50% of the award. Final TSR performance will be as low as zero.finally determined at the end of the 2018 fiscal year. Earned TSR-Based PUs, if any, will vest in one installment on the later of February 13, 2017 or the date the Compensation Committee certifies achievement of performance results.18, 2019.

(10)(12)
PUs will be earned based on revenue and ROIC for fiscal 2016 relative to pre-established performance targets for the same period. The performance range on this award will be 0% to 200% of the target award. The number of 2017 Storage Revenue & ROIC PUs included abovein the table reflects performance at the threshold level, which would result in a payout of 50% of the award. The Company's performance levelwill be finally determined at the end of 25% of target.2019. Earned PUs, if any, will vest in one installment on the laterFebruary 16, 2020.

Table of March 14, 2017 or the date the Compensation Committee certifies achievement of performance results.

Contents

(11)(13)
TSR-Based PUs will be earned based on 3-year TSR performance ending on December 31, 2017 relative to the S&P 500 (excluding financial services companies). The performance range on this award will be 0% to 200% of the target award. The number of 2017 TSR-Based PUs included abovein the table reflects performance at the threshold performance level.level, which would result in a payout of 50% of the award. Final relative TSR performance will not be measured untilfinally determined at the end of the performance period and the final result may vary from the level illustrated above, and could be as low as zero.2019 fiscal year. Earned TSR-Based PUs, if any, will vest in one installment on the later of February 19, 2018 or the date the Compensation Committee certifies achievement of performance results.16, 2020.

(12)
PUs will be earned based on storage rental revenue and ROIC for fiscal 2017 relative to pre-established performance targets for the same period. The performance range on this award will be 0% to 200% of the target award. The number of PUs included above reflects the threshold performance level of 25% of target. Earned PUs, if any, will vest in one installment on the later of February 19, 2018 or the date the Compensation Committee certifies achievement of performance results.

(13)(14)
Options vest in two substantially equal installments on March 14, 2016July 25, 2018 and March 14, 2017.

(14)
RSUs vest in one installment on March 15, 2016.July 25, 2019.

(15)
RSUs vest in one installment on November 5, 2016.

(16)
RSUs vest in two substantially equal installments on March 14, 2016July 25, 2018 and March 14, 2017.July 25, 2019.

(17)(16)
RSUs vest in one installment on February 13, 2016.

(18)
Options vest in twothree substantially equal installments on March 2, 201613, 2018, March 13, 2019 and March 2, 2017.13, 2020.

(19)(17)
Options vest in three substantially equal installments on July 21, 2016, July 21, 2017March 13, 2018, March 13, 2019 and July 21, 2018.March 13, 2020.

(20)
RSUs vest in three substantially equal installments on July 21, 2016, July 21, 2017 and July 21, 2018.

(21)(18)
Options vest in three substantially equal installments on May 27, 2016, May 27, 2017 and May 27, 2018.

(22)(19)
RSUs vest in three substantially equal installments on May 27, 2016, May 27, 2017 and May 27, 2018.


Option Exercises and Stock Vested at Fiscal Year-EndYear End for 20152017


 Option Awards Stock Awards  Option Awards Stock Awards 
Named Executive Officer
 Number of
Shares Acquired
on Exercise
(#)
 Value Realized
on Exercise
($)
 Number of
Shares Acquired
on Vesting
(#)
 Value Realized
on Vesting
($)(1)
  Number of
Shares Acquired
on Exercise
(#)
 Value Realized
on Exercise
($)
 Number of
Shares Acquired
on Vesting
(#)
 Value Realized
on Vesting
($)(1)
 

William L. Meaney

 N/A N/A 21,091 $886,816  N/A N/A 113,666 $4,767,312 

Roderick Day

 N/A N/A 18,781 $719,339 

Stuart Brown

 N/A N/A 8,747 $323,595 

Fidelma Russo

 N/A N/A N/A N/A 

Ernest Cloutier

 N/A N/A 6,569 $273,912 

Patrick Keddy

 23,428 $259,233 6,229 $253,331 

Marc A. Duale

 N/A N/A 22,604 $936,662  46,879 $307,904 23,905 $950,225 

Deirdre Evens

 N/A N/A N/A N/A 

Patrick Keddy

 N/A N/A 4,061 $168,866 

Eileen Sweeney

 59,005 $384,152 19,187 $850,411 

(1)
Value realized includesIncludes the payout of accrued cash dividend equivalents.


Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation for 20152017

        The Company provides certain of its more highly compensated employees in the United States, including theour Named Executive Officers, with the opportunity to defer between 5% and 100% of any 20152017 non-equity incentive compensation and/or up to between 5% and 50% of base salary through the EDCP. This benefit is offered to these employees in part because they are limited by the Code and applicable nondiscrimination testing rules in the amount of 401(k) contributions they can make under the Company's 401(k) Plan. Deferral elections and elections relating to the timing of payments are made prior to the period in which the salary and/or incentive compensation bonuses are earned. The Company does not contribute any matching, profit sharing or other funds to the EDCP for any employee. Participants in the EDCP can elect to invest their deferrals in funds that mirror, as closely as possible, the investment options available under the Company's 401(k) Plan. The EDCP does not pay any above market rates and is administered by the Compensation Committee.

        None of theour Named Executive Officers participated in a nonqualified deferred compensation plan during the year ended December 31, 2015.2017.

Termination and Change of Control Arrangements

        The Company maintains various contracts and agreements that require payments to acertain Named Executive OfficerOfficers at, following or in connection with (1) any termination of such officer, (2) a change in control of the Company, or (3) a change in such officer's responsibilities. This section describes the benefits that may become payable to certain Named Executive Officers in connection with a termination of their employment with the Company and/or a change in control of the Company under arrangements in effect on December 31, 2015.2017.


Table of Contents

Equity Treatment in Connection with a Change of Control

        As discussed on page 5460 of this Proxy Statement, our equity compensation plans provide that any unvested options and other awards granted under the respective plan will vest immediately should an employee be terminated by the Company, or terminate his or her own employment for "good reason," within the Relevant Period in connection with a vesting change of control. This applies to the same degree to all outstanding options held by employees, including theour Named Executive Officers.

CEO Severance Program

        Mr. Meaney is entitled to the benefits under the CEO Severance Program in the event of a "qualifying termination," which is generally defined as the termination of an eligible employee's employment without "cause" or termination by the eligible employee for "good reason." "Cause" is generally defined in the CEO Severance Program as any of: (1) fraud, embezzlement or theft against the Company; (2) being convicted of, or pleading guilty or no contest to, a felony; (3) breach of a fiduciary duty owed to the Company; (4) material breach of any material policy of the Company; (5) willful failure to perform material assigned duties (other than by reason of illness); or (6) committing an act of gross negligence, engaging in willful misconduct or otherwise acting with willful disregard for the best interests of the Company. "Good reason" in the CEO Severance Program means that Iron Mountainthe Company has, without Mr. Meaney's consent: (1) materially diminished the sum of his base compensation plus target nonequity incentive compensation; (2) required Mr. Meaney to be based at an office or primary work location that is greater than 50 miles from Boston, Massachusetts; (3) materially diminished Mr. Meaney's authority and/or responsibilities and/or assigned Mr. Meaney to duties and responsibilities that are generally inconsistent with his position with Iron Mountain prior to the change; (4) ceased to have Mr. Meaney report directly to the Board; or (5) materially breached the CEO Severance Program or the CEO Offer Letter.

        In the event of a qualifying termination under the CEO Severance Program, Mr. Meaney is entitled to certain severance benefits, including: (1) cash compensation consisting of (a) the sum of one year's base salary and a bonus payment equal to the annual target performance-based cash bonus for the year of termination, which aggregate amount would be doubled if such termination is in connection with a Change in Control, and (b) Mr. Meaney's actual annual performance-based bonus earned in respect to the year of termination based on the achievement of performance goals in accordance with the Company's annual incentive compensation program, with such bonus pro-ratedpro rated from the beginning of the fiscal year of termination through to the actual termination date; and (2) the Company's payment of (a) the employer share of the cost of medical and dental coverage under COBRA coverage until the earlier of (i) the first anniversary of Mr. Meaney's termination or for 18 months in connection with a Change in Control and (ii) the date on which COBRA coverage ends and (b) outplacement services for nine months following termination.

Severance Program

        Mr. Day, Mr.Messrs. Brown, Cloutier and Keddy and Ms. EvensRusso are entitled to the benefits under the Severance Program in the event of a "qualifying termination," which is generally defined as the termination of an eligible employee's employment without "cause" or termination by the eligible employee for "good reason." The definition of "Cause""cause" for the purposes of the Severance Program is substantially the same as the definition of "Cause""cause" in the CEO Severance Program, as described above. The definition of "good reason" in the Severance Program is substantially the same as good reason"good reason" under the 2002 Plan and the 2014 Plan with an additional component that could result in an acceleration if the eligible employee were to terminate his or her employment within 14 days prior to or 12 months after a vesting change of control. The additional component is a material diminution in the responsibilities or title or position with the Company and/or the assignment of duties and


Table of Contents

responsibilities that are generally inconsistent


with such eligible employee's position with the Company immediately prior to the vesting change in control.

        The definition of "good reason" as it applies to Mr. Day in the Severance Program has been modified to include an office or primary work location greater than 50 miles from either the Company's Boston corporate office or the Company's London corporate office.

        In the event of a qualifying termination under the Severance Program, the eligible employee is entitled to certain severance benefits, including: (1) cash compensation consisting of one year's base salary and a bonus payment generally equal to the annual target bonus for the eligible employee for the year of termination multiplied by such employee's average payout percentage over the prior three years; (2) the Company's payment of (a) the employer share of the cost of medical and dental coverage under COBRA coverage until the earlier of (i) the first anniversary of such employee's termination and (ii) the date on which COBRA coverage ends and (b) outplacement services for nine months following termination; (3) accelerated vesting of outstanding RSUs and stock options scheduled to vest within 12 months following termination; and (4) pro-ratedpro rated vesting of outstanding PUs based on actual performance using the following schedule and payable at the original vesting date:date, if earned as calculated at the end of the performance period:

    PUs outstanding for less than 12 months—33% vested

    PUs outstanding between 12 and 24 months—67% vested

    PUs outstanding 24 months or longer—100%

Duale EmploymentSeparation Agreement

        PursuantIn connection with his resignation on March 31, 2017, Mr. Duale became entitled to certain payments pursuant to the Amended and Restated Duale Employment Agreement and the Duale Separation Agreement, which are detailed in the event"Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Components of his qualifying termination,Compensation—Severance Policy—Separation and Advisory Agreements with Marc Duale" section of this Proxy Statement, including the estimated value of the payments. The value of the separation payments to which Mr. Duale is entitled is included in the "All Other Compensation" column of the "Compensation Tables—Summary Compensation Table—Summary Compensation Table for 2015, 2016 and 2017" section of this Proxy Statement.

Sweeney Separation Agreement

        In connection with her separation on October 5, 2017, Ms. Sweeney became entitled to the greater of (1) a non-competition indemnity payment of up to one year of his salary, (2)certain severance payments, due to him under applicable Luxembourg law or (3) payments equivalent to what he would be entitled to if he was a participantwhich are detailed in the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Components of Compensation—Severance Program.Policy—Separation Agreement with Eileen Sweeney" section of this Proxy Statement. The amounts Mr. Duale would have received upon a terminationvalue of his employment on December 31, 2015 are set forththe severance payments to which Ms. Sweeney is entitled is included in the tables below."All Other Compensation" column of the "Compensation Tables—Summary Compensation Table—Summary Compensation Table for 2015, 2016 and 2017" section of this Proxy Statement.

General

        It is a condition to receipt of severance benefits under each of (1) the CEO Severance Program and (2) the Severance Program and (3) the Amended and Restated Duale Employment Agreement that the employee receiving severance benefits under such program or agreement execute, deliver and not revoke a separation and release agreement and a confidentiality and non-competition agreement. The receipt of the employer share of the cost of medical and dental coverage under COBRA is conditioned on the employee not being in breach of either of the separation and release agreement or the confidentiality and non-competition agreement.

        The table below reflects the amount of compensation that would be paid to certain Named Executive Officers in the event of termination of such Named Executive Officers' employment upon a qualifying termination under the CEO Severance Program (in the case of Mr. Meaney), or the Severance Program (in the case of Ms. Russo and Messrs. DayBrown, Cloutier and Keddy and Ms. Evens) and the Amended and Restated Duale Employment Agreement (in the case of Mr. Duale)Keddy). The amounts shown assume that such termination was effective as of December 31, 2015.2017.


Table of Contents


Estimated Benefits Upon A Qualifying Termination Under the Applicable Severance Program

Named Executive Officer
 Cash
Severance
($)
 Continuation of
Benefits and
Outplacement
Services
($)
 Acceleration of
Unvested Options,
RSUs and PUs
($)(1)
 Total
($)
  Cash
Severance
($)
 Continuation of
Benefits and
Outplacement
Services
($)
 Acceleration of
Unvested Options,
RSUs and PUs
($)(1)
 Total
($)
 

William L. Meaney

 4,082,725 38,520 N/A 4,121,245  $4,306,000 $38,949 N/A $4,344,949 

Roderick Day(2)

 912,103 26,579 1,100,177 2,038,859 

Marc A. Duale(3)

 1,097,443 72,991 925,996 2,096,430 

Deirdre Evens

 702,088 25,000 365,363 1,092,451 

Patrick Keddy(2)

 782,255 26,579 295,051 1,103,885 

Stuart Brown

 $1,041,810 $38,949 $916,920 $1,997,679 

Fidelma Russo

 $859,807 $25,000 $617,098 $1,501,905 

Ernest Cloutier

 $964,884 $53,932 $1,125,603 $2,144,419 

Patrick Keddy(2)

 $864,890 $27,290 $1,207,368 $2,099,548 

(1)
These amounts are based on a price per share of our Common Stock of $27.01$37.73, the closing price of our Common Stock on December 31,29, 2017, and reflect the value of earned PUs for the PUs which were granted in 2015 and the value of PUs that would be earned if the Company achieved target performance for PUs granted after 2015.

(2)
Mr. Day's and Mr. Keddy's estimated benefits, except for elements denominated in U.S. dollars, were converted to U.S. dollars using a conversion rate of £1.00 to $1.5287,$1.2884, which represents the average exchange rate for fiscal 2015.

(3)
Mr. Duale's estimated benefits, except for elements denominated in U.S. dollars, were converted to U.S. dollars using a conversion rate of €1.00 to $1.1092, which represents the average exchange rate for fiscal 2015.2017.

        The table below reflects the amount of compensation that would be paid to certain Named Executive Officers in the event of termination of such Named Executive Officers' employment upon a qualifying termination under the CEO Severance Program (in the case of Mr. Meaney), or the Severance Program (in the case of Ms. Russo and Messrs. DayBrown, Cloutier and Keddy and Ms. Evens) or the Amended and Restated Duale Employment Agreement (in the case of Mr. Duale) in connection with a change of control.Keddy). The amounts shown assume that such termination was effective as of December 31, 2015.2017.


Estimated Benefits Upon A Qualifying Termination Under the
Applicable Severance Program in Connection with a Change in Control

Named Executive Officer
 Cash
Severance
($)
 Continuation of
Benefits and
Outplacement
Services
($)
 Total
($)
  Cash
Severance
($)
 Continuation of
Benefits and
Outplacement
Services
($)
 Total
($)
 

William L. Meaney

 6,432,725 45,280 6,478,005  $6,806,000 $45,923 $6,851,923 

Roderick Day(1)

 912,103 26,579 938,682 

Marc A. Duale(2)

 1,097,443 72,991 1,170,434 

Deirdre Evens

 702,088 25,000 727,088 

Patrick Keddy(1)

 782,255 26,579 808,834 

Stuart Brown

 $1,041,810 $38,949 $1,080,759 

Fidelma Russo

 $859,807 $25,000 $884,807 

Ernest Cloutier

 $964,884 $53,932 $1,018,816 

Patrick Keddy(1)

 $864,890 $27,290 $892,180 

(1)
Mr. Day's and Mr. Keddy's estimated benefits, except for elements denominated in U.S. dollars, were converted to U.S. dollars using a conversion rate of £1.00 to $1.5287,$1.2884, which represents the average exchange rate for fiscal 2015.

(2)
Mr. Duale's estimated benefits, except for elements denominated in U.S. dollars, were converted to U.S. dollars using a conversion rate of €1.00 to $1.1092, which represents the average exchange rate for fiscal 2015.2017.

Table of Contents


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

2017 Director Compensation

        The following table provides certain information concerning compensation earned by the directors who were not Named Executive Officers during the year ended December 31, 2015.2017.

Name
 Fees Earned
or Paid
in Cash
($)
 Stock
Awards
($)(1)(2)
 All Other
Compensation
($)
 Total
($)
  Fees Earned
or Paid
in Cash
($)
 Stock
Awards
($)(1)(2)
 All Other
Compensation
($)
 Total
($)
 

Jennifer Allerton

 $89,000 $134,983 $ $223,983  $96,000 $134,989 $ $230,989 

Ted R. Antenucci

 $89,000 $134,983 $ $223,983  $96,000 $134,989 $ $230,989 

Pamela M. Arway

 $105,917 $134,983 $10,047(3)$250,947  $110,000 $134,989 $11,412.72(3)$256,401.72 

Clarke H. Bailey

 $106,333 $134,983 $10,047(3)$251,363  $112,000 $134,989 $9,908.28(3)$256,897.28 

Neil Chatfield

 $71,750 $134,989 $ $206,739 

Kent P. Dauten

 $107,333 $134,983 $ $242,316  $114,131.88 $134,989 $ $249,120.88 

Paul F. Deninger

 $89,250 $134,983 $ $224,233  $90,000 $134,989 $ $224,989 

Per-Kristian Halvorsen

 $89,250 $134,983 $ $224,233  $95,333.34 $134,989 $ $230,322.34 

Michael W. Lamach

 $45,250 $ $ $45,250 

Wendy J. Murdock

 $95,000 $134,989 $ $229,989 

Walter Rakowich

 $104,000 $134,983 $ $238,983  $111,000 $134,989 $ $245,989 

Alfred J. Verrecchia

 $187,000 $134,983 $ $321,983  $197,000 $134,989 $ $331,989 

(1)
The amounts reported in the "Stock Awards" column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs granted in 20152017 computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 2 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.2017. Each non-employee director was granted 3,6733,879 RSUs on May 28, 2015.24, 2017. As of December 31, 2015,2017, certain non-employee directors held options to acquire shares of our Common Stock. All options reflected in the table below are fully vested.

Name
 Option
Awards
(#)
 Total
(#)
 

Jennifer Allerton

     

Ted R. Antenucci

     

Pamela M. Arway

     

Clarke H. Bailey

  52,494  52,494 

Kent P. Dauten

  42,722  42,722 

Paul F. Deninger

  13,390  13,390 

Per-Kristian Halvorsen

     

Michael W. Lamach

     

Walter Rakowich

     

Alfred J. Verrecchia

  18,290  18,290 
Name
Option
Awards
(#)

Jennifer Allerton

Ted R. Antenucci

Pamela M. Arway

Clarke H. Bailey

33,924

Neil Chatfield

Kent P. Dauten

33,924

Paul F. Deninger

13,390

Per-Kristian Halvorsen

Wendy J. Murdock

Walter Rakowich

Alfred J. Verrecchia

18,290
(2)
Messrs. Antenucci, Bailey, RakowichHalvorsen and Verrecchia elected to defer 100% of their RSUs granted in 20152017 pursuant to the DDCP.

(3)
The amounts reported in the "All Other Compensation" column for Mr. Bailey and Ms. Arway consist of amounts paid for health and dental plan coverage.

        Directors who are employees of the Company do not receive additional compensation for serving as directors. Pursuant to the Company's Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors,


Table of Contents

non-employee directors were paid an annual retainer of $70,000$75,000 in 2015,2017, and committee members and committee chairs received annual retainer fees as set forth below:


 Audit
Committee
 Compensation
Committee
 Nominating
and
Governance
Committee
 Finance
Committee
 Risk
and
Safety
Committee
  Audit
Committee
 Compensation
Committee
 Nominating
and
Governance
Committee
 Finance
Committee
 Risk
and
Safety
Committee
 

Annual Committee Member Retainer

 $10,000 $9,000 $9,000 $9,000 $9,000  $11,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 

Annual Committee Chair Retainer

 $15,000 $15,000 $8,000 $8,000 $8,000  $15,000 $15,000 $12,000 $12,000 $12,000 

        In addition, in 20152017 the Independent Chairman received an annual retainer of $100,000, and non-employee directors received annual grants of RSUs for the number of shares of our Common Stock equal to $135,000 divided by the fair market value (as defined in the 2014 Plan) on the date of grant. The RSUs vestvested immediately on the date of grant. Newly elected non-employee directors will receive a pro-ratedpro rated grant as of the date of their election.

        The DDCP allows non-employee directors to defer the receipt of between 5% and 100% of their retainers. Non-employee directors may also defer some or all of their annual RSU grant under the DDCP. Deferral elections and elections relating to the timing and form of payments are made prior to the period in which the retainers, fees and awards are earned. The Company does not contribute any matching, profit-sharingprofit sharing or other funds to the DDCP for any participating director. Amounts under the DDCP are treated as invested in shares of our Common Stock. The DDCP is administered by the Chairman of the Compensation Committee and the executive vice president human resources.primarily responsible for oversight and administration of our compensation programs.

Modifications to Director Compensation for 20162018

        The Nominating and GovernanceCompensation Committee annually reviews, with assistance from compensation consultants, the compensation of our directors in comparison to companies with similar revenues and business and makes adjustments it believes are appropriate.

        Effective January 2016,2018, following a market analysis of director compensation conducted by our Nominating and Governancethe Compensation Committee, with assistance from Pay Governance, we modified our non-employee director compensation plan to (1) increase the annual board retainer for each non-employee director from $70,000$75,000 to $75,000 and$80,000, (2) increase the annual retainer for the NominatingAudit Committee from $11,000 to $13,500, (3) increase the annual retainer for the Compensation Committee from $10,000 to $12,500, (4) increase the annual retainer for the Independent Chairman of the Board from $100,000 to $125,000, and Governance Committee chair, Finance Committee chair and Risk and Safety Committee chair(5) increase the annual stock grant value for each non-employee director from $8,000$135,000 to $10,000.$150,000.

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

        The Company maintainsWe maintain stock ownership guidelines that require non-employee directors to achieve and maintain ownership of our Common Stock at or above a prescribed level. Our directors who are also employees of the Company are subject to the Company's executive stock ownership guidelines described on page 5461 of this Proxy Statement. The CompanyWe established this program to help align long-termlong term interests of directors with stockholders. The stock ownership guidelines require each director to own and retain Common Stock of the Company, exclusive of unexercised stock options and unearned or unvested restricted stock, RSUs, performance shares or PUs, having a value equal to five times the director's annual cash retainer earned for serving on the Board. Under the stock ownership guidelines, shares of Common Stock that are held in margin accounts or otherwise pledged to secure loans are not counted towards the ownership minimum.

        Compliance with the stock ownership guidelines is measured by multiplying the number of shares of the Company's Common Stock owned at the close of business on October 1 of each year by the


Table of Contents

average closing price per share of the Company's Common Stock, based on each trading day's closing price as reported on the NYSE, over the 60 calendar days preceding the date of calculation. The stock ownership guidelines do not limit the transfer of, or require retention of, shares of Common Stock that were outstanding as of the date of adoption of the stock ownership guidelines or that are issued under


any equity awards outstanding as of such date. Whenever a director does not meet the above minimum ownership threshold, such director is required to retain an amount equal to 50% of the net shares received as a result of the settlement or vesting of restricted stock, RSUs, performance shares or PUs or the exercise of stock options. "Net shares" are those shares that remain after shares are sold or netted to pay any applicable taxes or purchase price. Because directors must retain a percentage of shares resulting from the vesting of RSUs until they achieve the minimum share ownership threshold, there is no minimum time period required to achieve the stock ownership guidelines.


CONSIDERATION OF RISK IN OUR COMPENSATION PROGRAMS

        After its annual review of the Company's incentive compensation arrangements for all employees, the Compensation Committee concluded that the components and structure of the Company's compensation plans do not create risks that are reasonably likely to result in a material adverse effect on the Company. The process undertaken to reach this conclusion involved an analysis of the Company's compensation plans by management and the Compensation Committee.

        As described on page 1716 of this Proxy Statement, the committee of the Board assigned responsibility for an area of risk receives reports from the Company executives accountable for understanding and mitigating the identified risk and then assesses such reports and independently considers the severity of the risk and mitigating factors.

        In the case of compensation risk, management and the Compensation Committee discussed management's assessment of the risks that may exist in the Company's compensation plans and the factors that mitigate the creation of material risks to the Company by those plans. The management team's assessment was conducted by senior personnel, within the human resources and legal departments, including personnel who focus on compensation.

        The management assessment focused on the material elements of the Company's compensation plans for all employees, including (1) the components of compensation that are materially similar to the components of compensation offered to the Company's Named Executive Officers discussed in the "Executive Compensation" section of this Proxy Statement, (2) specific performance measures used for employees, and (3) the mix between short-term and long-term compensation, as well as factors in the Company's programs that mitigate potential risks. Management's analysis noted that several factors mitigated excessive risk taking to achieve goals tied to compensation, including (1) individual employee incentive compensation amount maximums, (2) aligning individual performance targets with Company-wide performance, (3) the use of more than one performance metric for short-term and long-term incentives, (4) the adoption of multi-year performance goals in the performance unit portion of the long-term incentive program, (5) setting reasonably attainable goals for all employees, (6) the internal processes and controls for calculating and reviewing bonus payouts, (7) stock ownership requirements for our CEO and executive vice presidents, (8) having a clawback policy for executive officers, and (9) having a combination of short-term and long-term incentive payouts.

        In the Compensation Committee's review of the Company's compensation plans, the Compensation Committee considered management's assessment of the various elements of the Company's compensation program and factors that mitigate unreasonable risk taking. The Compensation Committee then conducted its own assessment through a discussion of the potential risks and the factors that mitigate risk. The Compensation Committee concluded, based on a combination of factors, including the structure and components of the plans, that the Company's compensation plans do not create risks that are reasonably likely to result in a material adverse effect on the Company.


Table of Contents


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

        No member of the Compensation Committee was, during 2015,2017, an officer or employee of the Company or was formerly an officer of the Company or had any relationship requiring disclosure by us under Item 404 of Regulation S-K of the Exchange Act. Please refer to "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions," below, for additional information. None of our executive officersExecutive Officers served as a member of the compensation committee (or its equivalent) of another entity or as a director of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on our Compensation Committee. None of our executive officersExecutive Officers served as a member of the compensation committee (or its equivalent) of another entity, one of whose executive officers served as one of our directors.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

        The Board has adopted a written Related Person Transaction Policies and Procedures, or the Related Persons Policy, which provides that all transactions with related persons are subject to approval or ratification by our Audit Committee. With certain exceptions, the Related Persons Policy provides that the Audit Committee shall review the material facts of all transactions with related persons and either approve or disapprove of the transaction. Under the Related Persons Policy, transactions covered include transactions involving the Company, amounts in excess of $120,000 and a Related Person (a term that includes executive officers, directors, nominees for election as directors, beneficial owners of 5% or more of the Company's stock and immediate family members of the foregoing). The Audit Committee will determine whether the terms of a covered transaction are fair to the Company and no less favorable to the Company than would be generally available absent the relationship with the counterparty, whether there are business reasons for the transaction, whether the transaction impairs the independence of an outside director, whether the transaction would represent an improper conflict of interest and whether the transaction is material, among other considerations. In the event that prior approval of a covered transaction is not feasible, the Related Persons Policy provides that a transaction may be approved by the chairman of the Audit Committee in accordance with such Policy. The chairman shall report any such approvals at the next Audit Committee meeting. If the Company becomes aware of a transaction with a Related Person that has not been approved by the Audit Committee prior to its consummation, the Audit Committee shall review such transaction and evaluate all possible options, including ratification, revision or termination of such transaction and shall take such action as it deems appropriate under the circumstances. The Related Persons Policy is intended to supplement, and not supersede, our other policies and procedures with respect to transactions with Related Persons. There were no new transactions with related persons that required the review of our Audit Committee in 2015.

        Paul F. Deninger, one of our directors, is a senior managing director at Evercore. In May 2013, we entered into an agreement with Evercore, or the Evercore Engagement, which was amended and restated in August 2013, pursuant to which Evercore agreed to provide financial advisory services to us in exchange for an aggregate fee of up to $3,000,000. In connection with the Evercore Engagement, Mr. Deninger agreed, and Evercore represented, that Mr. Deninger would not be involved with the Evercore Engagement and would not receive any fees or direct compensation in connection with the Evercore Engagement. The Evercore Engagement was approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with our Related Persons Policy. In 2013 we incurred $2,750,000 of fees associated with the Evercore Engagement, including fees associated with the amendment of our credit agreement in August 2013 and discounts and commissions attributable to Evercore's participation as one of the underwriters in our debt offerings in August 2013, as well as monthly retention fees. Effective December 31, 2013, Evercore completed its obligations to provide services under the Evercore Engagement, and the Company incurred the final $250,000 of fees associated with the Evercore Engagement in 2014 and


made the final payment of $250,000 in 2015. No additional payments are due under the Evercore Engagement.

Audit Committee Report

        Management is responsible for the Company's financial reporting process, including its system of internal controls, and for the preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Company's independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing those financial statements. The Audit Committee's responsibility is to monitor and review these processes.

        The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm and management the plan and results of the auditing engagement and the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.2017. The Audit Committee has reviewed with management the scope and nature of the Company's internal auditing controls and has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB, Auditing Standard No. 16,1301, Communications With Audit Committees. In addition, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent registered public accounting firm's communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm its independence from the Company and its management. The Audit Committee considered whether the provision of non-audit services by the independent registered public accounting firm is compatible with maintaining the independent registered public accounting firm's independence and concluded that it was acceptable at this time.

        The Audit Committee has reported to the Board its activities, conclusions and recommendations. Specifically, in reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board has approved, that the audited financial statements be included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015,2017, as filed with the SEC on February 26, 2016.16, 2018. The Audit Committee has approved the reappointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016.2018.

  AUDIT COMMITTEE
WALTER C. RAKOWICH,CHAIRMAN
JENNIFER ALLERTON
TED R. ANTENUCCI
KENT P. DAUTEN

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

        The Company has submitted the selection of the Company's independent registered public accounting firm to a stockholder vote, as set forth in Item 3proposal three above.


Table of Contents

        The Audit Committee has established policies and procedures that are intended to control the services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm and to monitor its continuing independence. Under these policies, no audit or non-audit services may be undertaken by our independent registered public accounting firm unless the engagement is specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee may delegate to one or more members the authority to grant the pre-approvals required by this paragraph. The decisions of any member to whom authority is delegated to pre-approve an activity under this paragraph must be presented to the full Audit Committee at each of its scheduled meetings.


        The fees for services provided by Deloitte & Touche LLP, the member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, and their respective affiliates, or collectively, Deloitte, to us for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20142016 and December 31, 20152017 were as follows:


 FY 2014 FY 2015  FY 2016 FY 2017 

Audit Fees(1)

 $6,581,000 $5,950,000  $6,893,000 $6,879,000 

Audit-Related Fees(1)(2)

 1,337,000 862,000  1,536,000 322,000 

Tax Fees(2)(3)

 2,618,000 2,186,000  1,491,000 1,315,000 

Deloitte & Touche LLP Total Fees

 $10,536,000 $8,998,000  $9,920,000 $8,516,000 

(1)
Audit Fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered by the independent registered public accounting firm for the audit of the Company's annual consolidated financial statements, audit of the internal controls over financial reporting, and reviews of the consolidated financial statements included the Company's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. Audit Fees also consist of services that are normally provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in connection with statutory audits and regulatory filings, review of documents filed with the SEC, and providing consents in connection with SEC filings and comfort letters in connection with offerings of registered and unregistered securities.

(2)
Audit-Related Fees for 20152016 and 2017 include audit fees related to our proposed acquisition of Recall. Audit-Related Fees for 2014 include reviews of proposed accounting, tax and system changes performed in connection with our conversion to a REIT, effective January 1, 2014.

(2)(3)
Tax Fees include tax compliance work and consulting relating to our proposed acquisition of Recall our conversion to a REIT and other tax planning and compliance matters in 20142016 and 2015.2017.

        The Audit Committee will not approve engagements of our independent registered public accounting firm to perform non-audit services for us if doing so will cause our independent registered public accounting firm to cease to be independent within the meaning of applicable SEC or NYSE rules. In other circumstances, the Audit Committee considers, among other things, whether our independent registered public accounting firm is able to provide the required services in a more or less effective and efficient manner than other available service providers.

        The total fees billed to us from Deloitte for services in 20142016 and 20152017 are set forth above. All the services provided by Deloitte described above were pre-approved by our Audit Committee. The Audit Committee approved the engagement of Deloitte to provide non-audit services because they determined that Deloitte's providing these services would not compromise its independence and that its familiarity with our record keeping and accounting systems would permit it to provide these services with equal or higher quality, quicker and at a lower cost than we could obtain these services from other providers.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

        Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires that the Company's executive officers, directors and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company's equity securities file reports of ownership on Form 3 and changes in ownership on Form 4 or 5 with the SEC. Such executive officers,


Table of Contents

directors and 10% stockholders are also required by SEC rules to furnish to the Company copies of all Section 16(a) reports that they file. Based solely on its review of the copies of such forms received by it, or written representations from certain reporting persons that they were not required to file a Form 5, the Company believes that, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015,2017, the Company's executive officers,Executive Officers, directors and 10% stockholders complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to such persons.persons, except that a late report was filed on April 3, 2017 relating to the partial vesting of stock options and RSUs held by Marc A. Duale.


OTHER MATTERS

Other Matters Brought Before the Meeting

        The Board does not know of any other matters that may come before the Annual Meeting. However, if any other matters are properly presented to the Meeting, it is the intention of the persons


named in the accompanying proxy to vote, or otherwise act, in accordance with their best judgment on such matters.

Additional Documentation

        The Company will furnish without charge to any stockholder, upon written or oral request, a copy of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the financial statements and other documents filed pursuant to Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Requests for such documents should be addressed to the Secretary of Iron Mountain Incorporated, One Federal Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02110, telephone number (617) 535-4766.

 By Order of the Board of Directors

 

ERNEST W. CLOUTIER,Secretary DEBORAH MARSON, SECRETARY

April 26, 201630, 2018


 

VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. U.S. Eastern Time on June 16, 2016.13, 2018 (1:59 P.M. Australian Eastern Standard Time on June 14, 2018). Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED INVESTOR RELATIONS ONE FEDERAL STREET BOSTON, MA 02110 ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. U.S. Eastern Time on June 16, 2016.13, 2018 (1:59 P.M. Australian Eastern Standard Time on June 14, 2018). Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED INVESTOR RELATIONS ONE FEDERAL STREET BOSTON, MA 02110 TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: E00404-TBDE45348-P05001 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following: 1. For the election of twelve (12)eleven (11) directors to the Iron Mountain Incorporated Board of Directors for a one-year term or until their successors are elected and qualified. Nominees: For Against Abstain ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Against ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Abstain! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1a. Jennifer Allerton For Against Abstain ! ! ! ! ! ! 1k. Walter C. Rakowich 1b. Ted R. Antenucci 1l. Alfred J. Verrecchia 1c. Pamela M. ArwayFor Against Abstain The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2 and 3. 1d. Clarke H. Bailey ! ! ! 1c. Pamela M. Arway 2. The approval of a non-binding, advisory resolution approving the compensation of our named executive officers as described in the Iron Mountain Incorporated Proxy Statement. 1d. Clarke H. Bailey 3. The ratification of the selection by the Audit Committee of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Iron Mountain Incorporated's independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2016.2018. ! ! ! 1e. Neil Chatfield 1f. Kent P. Dauten 3. ! ! ! 1g.1f. Paul F. Deninger 1h. Per-Kristian Halvorsen NOTE: In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting of Stockholders or any postponement or adjournment thereof. 1i.1g. Per-Kristian Halvorsen 1h. William L. Meaney 1j.1i. Wendy J. Murdock 1j. Walter C. Rakowich 1k. Alfred J. Verrecchia Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date

GRAPHIC

 


Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com. E00405-TBDE45349-P05001 IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED Annual Meeting of Stockholders June 17, 2016, 10:14, 2018, 9:00 AMA.M. This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors The undersigned hereby appoints William L. Meaney and Ernest W. Cloutier,Deborah Marson, and each of them, as proxies of the undersigned, each with the power to appoint hishis/her substitute, and hereby authorizes both of them, or either one if only one be present, to represent and vote, as designated on the reverse hereof, all of the shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share, of IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED held of record by the undersigned or with respect to which the undersigned is entitled to vote or act at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 17, 201614, 2018 at 10:9:00 AM, local time,A.M., U.S. Eastern Time (11:00 P.M. Australian Eastern Standard Time on June 14, 2018), at the offices of Sullivan & Worcester LLP, One Post Office Square, 21st Floor, Boston, MA 02109, and any adjournment or postponement thereof. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors' recommendations. Additionally, the votes entitled to be cast by the undersigned will be cast in the discretion of the proxy holder on any other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting. Continued and to be signed on reverse side

GRAPHIC

 



QuickLinks

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED NOTICE OF 2016 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON JUNE 17, 2016
IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2016 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS To be held on June 17, 2016 GENERAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Committee Membership
ITEM 2
ADVISORY VOTE ON THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
ITEM 3
RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
Equity Compensation Plan Information
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Payouts of Short-Term Incentive Compensation
COMPENSATION TABLES
Summary Compensation Table for 2013, 2014 and 2015
2015 Awards
2014 Awards
2013 Awards
Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2015
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End for 2015
Option Exercises and Stock Vested at Fiscal Year-End for 2015
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation for 2015
Estimated Benefits Upon A Qualifying Termination Under the Applicable Severance Program
Estimated Benefits Upon A Qualifying Termination Under the Applicable Severance Program in Connection with a Change in Control
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
CONSIDERATION OF RISK IN OUR COMPENSATION PROGRAMS
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
OTHER MATTERS